'Before' the 'big bang!'

We are 13 1/2 billion days late. If that is this theory? I'm everything in every direction with in our universe. Everything up to depth in your Cosmos

your link miclee, just further confirms for me, that 'big bang theory' is just that! A theory! I think it's also a very loose fitting theory, at that.

Science should start to get comfortable with the idea of the 'unknown,' if it wants to advance. It's only by being truthful (that the truth of certain matters are not currently scientifically known), that it will attain the truth faster.

If science had been saying from the very beginnings of science, that we don't currently know how the universe has come to exist (and they still don't), then I think we would be having more advances on the topic than we currently are.

Science knows how we came about. There was a flash of light caused by protons colliding and instigated by god. The light turned to matter and planets were gradually formed. Quite simple even for you. God populated the world with Adam and Eve and you eventually came to exist.

geez, we're certainly getting into mind boggling stuff now!

those who have had a Near Death Experience (NDE) often say that time was different whilst they had their experience. They seem to present time happening all at once, not like the drawn out experience by those on Earth.

this is where I draw a line. I don't believe there are exact copies of humans in other worlds. There may be other humans in other worlds, and possibly 'close' copies of humans from this world. But I don't believe there are exact copies, or exact copies that have previously lived in, or will live in, our world or other worlds.

People who think that won't be having any serious conversation with me!

And maybe that should be scientists position? That science is limited by time, so it can never get to the truth. Rather than saying 'it all began with the big bang.' What a load of crock coming from science!

now I think this is the best link so far. Well done Swamie

believing that creation evolved from a big bang would be like saying Picasso didn't actually paint any paintings. The paint arranged itself without anyone doing it
and all he did was sign his name to it...(creation being obviously on a much grander scale)

Well he was obviously wrong about that.

The thing with the multiverse theory is that although the math allows for it, it cannot be considered to be science because by the theory's own postulates, these parallel universes are not-observable by us in any way. In science, if you cannot observe/measure directly or indirectly something, then you don't need to take it into account.

Now, the non-interactivity of these hypothetical parallel universes if being questioned. If that changes, and these parallel universes do interact with each other, and we are eventually able to establish that through measurement or observation of some kind, then it's a whole different ball game.

I cannae wait.. I cannae.