Texas cops too afraid to save the little children?
"That may be helpful for officers who responded in Uvalde to avoid accountability, but it's harmful to the folklore we’re often sold about police, both in pop culture and from lawmakers. Over the past two weeks, Republicans in particular have responded to high-profile mass shootings in Uvalde and Buffalo, New York, with calls for more police and more guns — essentially, anything but gun control. But that’s clearly not an adequate fix. Uvalde is proof that many officers simply won’t do the work conservatives suggest they will — especially under duress. And courts don't think that should be required of them""The Supreme Court ruling that suggests police in Uvalde won't face major consequences
A 2005 opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia could help law enforcement officials evade serious repercussions over their botched response to the Texas shooting"
MSNBC
Comments (5)
The U.S. military used to take those folks straight to a firing squad.
When our own manic shot 69 at that summercamp in 2011 the police was slow as fouk too but in that case I think it was more due to no experience and no helicopter with a gunner available in time. Now I think they may have learned and there is a new police response center up and running. I hope their choppers are ready with live rifles in the backseat!
I also read all kinds of cover up and false information is coming out.
Now I just heard theres another shooting in a hospital in Tulsa!
If ever there was "a right wing" in Amerika,
It died from Cancer & oxygen depravation in 1964.
Side Note | SHIFT LOCK CAPS
EVEN THE JBS WAS LED BY A DEMOCRAT, A DEMOCRAT, A DEMOCRAT, A DEMOCRAT [ D.
IN 1983 !
R I P, ..L. PATTON MCDONALD [ D. GA.
...} ..see flight 007 korean air lines.
The repetition is because there are magic Democrats still running amuk....in their strong TV delusion