The E. Jean Carroll case...
This deserves a blog of it's own. Back in the 1990's Carroll claims Donald Trump raped her in a famous New York City department store. Trump denied her allegation. He said she's not his type.I read she kept the garment she was wearing that has his sperm on it and a DNA test would be conclusive. I also read the court isn't allowing the test.
There's a second issue of defamation where he's being sued by Carroll based on disparaging comments he made in response to her accusation.
Trump's lawyers tried and failed to get both cases dismissed.
Over the years, he's been accused of rape several times, but none of them stuck. I recall one woman backed out before the trial due to death threats.
Another woman came forward and the situation was different. Either Trump or one of his lawyers made a clarification or comparison, but that only sounded like he was part of both and the women weren't lying.
So the man who's in court over business fraud, indirectly paying a porn star hush money, a boasting womanizer with a history of affairs while married, had partied with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell is teetering over a rape case that may actually lean in Carroll's favor. He would be found guilty of s*xual assault. Convicted Rapists in Florida are on a list and their movements are often restricted.
Blogs don't ask questions.... what are your thoughts?
66,796/1,659
Comments (68)
Why would anyone demean their accuser, unless the wanted to reduce their position of greater power under the circumstances?
A non-deceptive person would be horrified at a false allegation and deny the alleged crime itself in the strongest of terms.
It wouldn't surprise me if he's held in contempt for disobeying the courts request.
Maybe a day in jail would be enough to show him the judge is serious.
Why would anyone demean their accuser, unless the wanted to reduce their position of greater power under the circumstances?
A non-deceptive person would be horrified at a false allegation and deny the alleged crime itself in the strongest of terms.
This is a man with a long history of attacking witnesses, investigators, prosecutors, trial jurors, grand jurors, judges, and others involved in legal proceedings against him.
Nothing like a Mafia ploy of intimidating witnesses or is it?
This is a man with a long history of attacking witnesses, investigators, prosecutors, trial jurors, grand jurors, judges, and others involved in legal proceedings against him.
Nothing like a Mafia ploy of intimidating witnesses or is it?
Or were his legal team being as mad as he?
I read (from a user comment) divulging the names & addresses of the jury is legal request of the defendants lawyer after selection, but in this case, the request came prior.
I also read in this case they were anonymous, so maybe the judge realized the potential of harm that could come from a trial so public.
Do you see a pattern forming? Actually, it was formed a long time ago. It's Trump's MO (modus operandi) in an attempt to distance himself with anything that could connect him with something negative about him.
Oh, my giddy aunt.
But then red this:
Is it me, or is that Trump admitting that the event took place?
Typical Donald J. Trump approach. Again, he was connected but looking for a viable way out that the judge/jury will accept.
BUT if she was my type I probably did it.
That was not my dream. Most teenagers want to try many jobs to find what they like.
Thanks to my parent's guidance I was able to explore in a safe way.
We all have the right to do what we want, that does not mean we should.
Women have a right to walk down a dark alley, but that does not mean she should.
Now perpetrators are held responsible for their actions and still it is an up hill battle for the victims.
A few decades ago victims were told not to report, no one will believe them. Listening to so many victims talking today because of the "me too movement," is scary.
THANK YOU TO MY PARENTS for keeping safe.
Last night I saw some comments that were very different and shed new light to the equation.
The department store is Bergdorf Goodman. They sell name brand goods from top manufacturers/designers like Prada and Gucci.
Trump was already a celebrity in New York City and had an entourage whenever he went shopping.
If you wanted to use the fitting room, a sales associate would keep track of the rooms and the number of garments you took to try. If something didn't fit, they would take it back and select a different size for you.
So, the commenter said it wasn't possible for Trump to push his way into the fitting room while Carroll was using it.
Why?
If she did, Trump would amazingly produce an out of town calendar appointment on or before that date making the perfect alibi.
Smart girl, isn't she?
If you followed along, there was a change in the law that allowed her to file suit.
Why?
If she did, Trump would amazingly produce an out of town calendar appointment on or before that date making the perfect alibi.
Smart girl, isn't she?
If you followed along, there was a change in the law that allowed her to file suit.
I'm not sure being very not nice carries any legal weight, as a rule.
After-all, he denied it happened, so why should he appear?
I found a link from a link to a podcast explaining how Donald J. Trump's lawyer who filed an early motion for mistrial that was denied by the court.
The Judge has already berated Trumps lawyers for Trumps remarks on media outlets
Why would anyone demean their accuser, unless the wanted to reduce their position of greater power under the circumstances?
A non-deceptive person would be horrified at a false allegation and deny the alleged crime itself in the strongest of terms.
Someone commented George looks really good in that photo, like he lost weight.
Yeah, one reply said he did lose about 110 pounds!
Earlier comments made, prove there is but only one
Nevertheless I can still forward on knowing the woman that was always obsessed with me...
still is.
What else to say, but I'm good like that
"The nine jurors (six men and three women) presiding over the case were chosen out of 100, and are set to be kept publicly anonymous throughout the trial."
If you've worked in this field, I'm even more dismayed at you making the judgements and using the language you have.
sorry lou lou
sorry lou lou