Should the safety of our community be compromised?
There's a lawyer named Dan Gustafson who is responsible in filing a lawsuit against the State of Minnesota for these animalistic p*dophile who believe that they should be released from prison and live in normalcy despite factual findings that they're never going to get better.What on earth is this all about? He cares for these hardcore scumbags and disregard the safety of our society?
How would you like to live near them?
I don't know about you, but as long as there's no cure for these sick people, they should remain in jail. Do you agree? My taxes should be used for my peace of mind knowing they will not commit these heinous crimes again.
Do you think that this lawyer would still choose to use his services if his daughter, mom, sister or wife got raped or worse molested by these scumbags? I bet he'd lock them to jail and rot and throw away the keys....you think?
Comments (35)
Sometimes these legal ethics lawyers really like to spend tax payers money!!...lol...basic rights are given to these criminals and when your crime is that heinous...you remain locked up period...considering the victim pays in years in regards to rehabilitation...or sometimes never recovers...castrating them (criminals) chemically is not 100% effective...I doubt we could afford to have them among the masses...parole is costly as well including the shear amount of police time just to keep tabs on them...
When they commit again, should we, the victims sue the government then? For failing to protect us? Making us as pawns to their vicious crimes?
Should be wants...
it is the judges and juries who make the decisions.
perhaps the jury is outsourced more and more in the USA by judges.
even an innocent may be found guilty, and that is the worst scenario.
but does a judge, jury or those who make the laws and those who vote for such politicians go to jail for that?
We must be vigilant on these parasites and evil people Ken.
I was only reading about those already locked up in jail. I didn't realize there's quite a number who's guilty yet not even prosecuted due to the failures of these leeches.
That's nothing he goes through compared to the pain and sorrow he caused.
Thanks for your vote. I'd definitely lock them forever.
there was something similar here. the state had to pay compensation because some people were still imprisoned after years, though there was nothing said about "Sicherungsverwahrung".
who, but a lawyer would do this for a prisoner?
always two sides of a page.
though it is all so terrible.
Imagine the load of the DA, and everyone. We must increase the numbers of workers to expedite time and put these people away from the public.
That's my question.
There was a public outcry and I believe they (people) wanted the judge to step down...but clearly some are living in lala land in regards to who to blame...sadly...
On which basis do you make these claims?
Given you've just indelibly and publicly accused a lawyer in writing, I do hope you have evidence which will stand up in court.
On the other hand, there's already an approved budget for the creation of facilities and manpower so as to keep them where they belong.
By the way let me first go and read your position because I'm not sure what are your points and questions relative to my post.
I'm on a weekend trip and don't have the article at my hands as its, at home and I'll point out the whole context of my o.p. based on the lawyer's taking on this case?
Like I mentioned, I have read the other reports that are in the cases in other States.
What exactly are your questions on my post? Are you for or against these monsters being released when in fact study shows they should and must not?
Or you go back to my first blog semi related to this? The previous one?
To whom do you refer?
To which studies do you refer?
WHY do I sense that you're questioning the credibility of the source of my opinion?
The way I understand the article is that there's some critical malpractice on the conduct of the Government on the release procedure of these criminals, in fact stating that there's a constitutional violation on their right, the exact words.
And, on top of that they're demanding for a better treatment? October which makes me wonder how they treated their victims?
On the other note, once you're a convicted criminal you lose almost all rights and privileges.
Is it wrong to assume that they will repeat it again? Or are you insinuating that I'm so stupid and ridiculous to ask this question?