It Should Work — Theoretically ???
I TOOK IT FROM "American Journal of Public Health" JUST SOUNDS SCAAAAARY LOLMarriage Is Good for Men (But Not for Women), Research Found
Benefits of marriage to men's healthFor a long time scientists believed that marriage provided health benefits to both women and men. However, a recent research of 10,000 people in UK has found that married women didn’t show profound health benefits, as compared to single ladies, while married men were healthier than the ones living on their own.
Scientists from 3 London academic institutions (School of Economics and Political Science, School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, and University College) joined their forces to analyse and record effects of long term partnerships and marriage on people’s health in middle age.
The main characteristics considered in the study were the metabolic syndrome (high blood pressure, obesity, diabetes) and respiratory deceases. To provide comparable data, a cohort of men and women born in the same week of 1958 was selected. Trained nurses visited their homes and performed detailed examinations.
Results:
Single women showed similar levels of health as their married counterparts.
Men in both official and de-facto marriages demonstrated better health than unattached males.
Divorce had some short-term detrimental effects on men’s health but it would improve if they entered another partnership. In general, males who re-partnered after a divorce would demonstrate about the same level of health as the ones who lived with the same partner since marrying in their 20s or 30s.
Surprisingly, the effects of divorce on women were the opposite. Ladies showed an improvement in their health levels following divorce in mid to late 20s, with 31% less chance to develop the metabolic syndrome as compared to wives in stable relationships.
In general, health levels of both genders would decline with age, with married women who never divorced showing the best levels of health. Differences in married and unmarried women were not profound, however, not having a long-term partner had proven to be significantly disadvantageous for men. For example, single men were 14% more likely to develop heart problems.
The conclusion: Men are better off married.
For women, having a long-term partner is not crucial in view of their health — although we know that sharing life with someone special is more enjoyable than living alone.
Another research in 2011 found that married people had 15% less chance of premature death, while 2014 study by the World Heath Organization pointed out that married people had fewer problems with depression.
Here is another reason for you, guys, to take it in your hands and change your life for the better: You will live a healthier (and hopefully, longer) life!
Comments (15)
I do not completely agree with the research findings as I know several unmarried men that have lived well into the late 80's or early 90's. Likewise I am aware of many married men that have died in their late 70's or early 80's despite having been married since their early 20's.
....
in my opinion the conclusion of that research couldn't be generalized to all men/women around the world
long life for all of us check your insurance friends
then, what food married men are eating ?
And these men who divorce and don't find someone new are the weighing-in factor for bad health in men. I wouldn't be the first to point out the high rates of loneliness in men over 55 and that is because divorced men are usually the ones who are squeezed and plundered dry, lose the kids and have to move to a new(and often poorer)area where they don't know anyone. And at best he gets weekend access to the kids, the weekend, the main time of the week for budding romance and making new friends.
Not complaining, just explaining. She's welcome to her life of gossip and busy doing nothing. Besides if I actually envied her life and wanted to be a home-husband that just means we're more likely to divorce, so I'd gain nothing anyway:
LOL