Why 25 Acres is a Waste For Some Owners

Beauty, nature, wild animals, peace, and tranquility are what comes to mind when you tell someone you live on twenty-five acres of land.

They might envision their kids and grandchildren having plenty of room to run and play. Or take walks through the forest. Allow your animals to roam free. Fresh air and starry skies and all that.

The truth is: You only need one acre of land if you are not doing anything more than that. When you live in the country, there is so much more to think about.

If you are productive and care about your land, you might decide to do any number of things like these:

Be self-sufficient and have your own farm to raise food for yourself and your family. Why not for your community?
Raise rabbits, sheep, goats and lambs.
Raise cattle.
Run a you-pick berry, fruit, flower or vegetable farm.
Grow pumpkins.
Turn the house into a bed and breakfast lodge.
Rent it out to hunters. (My least favorite!)
Have it cut for firewood. (Also not my favorite.)
We all take many things for granted in our lives and this is one of them.

Let me tell you about the lazy, unforgivable, wasteful part of this story.

It sits and rots. It is abandoned as is the life within it. The trees decay from disease and die. Sometimes being choked out by vines and weeds. Their branches lying strewn about in the yard to further pollute the landscape because no one picks them up.

The animals you thought were safe are dead on the road or have mysteriously disappeared because a coyote or an owl took them and you will never know for sure nor have closure about it.

There are insects everywhere. From wood-boring bees, fire ant hills popping up, mosquitos out to bite you constantly, black flies that won't let you pick your fruit without stinging you, and wasps building nests on every area of your house that they choose to.

Bushes wildly grown over because no one trimmed them back so that you could see out of the windows nor walk down the sidewalk without brushing them aside.

Pinecones falling where they please with no apparent useful purpose. Maybe to feed the few sparse squirrels that are still living there.

The flowers that once were lovingly planted there that no one is outside to see. Orange tiger lilies, daffodils in white and yellow, violet lavender flowers growing in the grass among the pink wildflowers.

What beauty there is, goes mostly unnoticed and unappreciated by those who live their lives in a selfish possession driven state. They are ignorant of the abundance and pleasure that is theirs if they could only see. All they do is complain about what it takes to do the more menial tasks of just keeping it up for appearances. Whenever they get around to it.

Do you know someone like this? How sad!
Post Comment

Comments (6)

This from the one complaining how no one would comme dig a simple hole for them? If you wish the appearance of your neighbor"s land to change, the solution is simple. Buy the land and then do as you will with it. Until then they are free to do as they will. BTW, A family of 3 needs a minimmum of 5 acresto be minimally self sufficient off their labd. More if there is live stock. Weird you bbelieve wood branches pollute. Rotting wood beccomes soil.
Hey lady! Go to bed!!!!thumbs down
Ken ls lt possible that decaying and decomposing wood ls doing harm to its local environment as lt breaks down
Or does lt just become lovely pure soil in one fell swoop ?
I grew up on a farm very close to a forest and would like to know more.
Also the 5 acres you quote that 3 people need to become self sufficient what are you basing that figure on and as
There are close to 7 billion people worldwide will there be enough land for everyone? 10 billion acres/4 billion
Hectares#

Manuman7# wave
Minuteman it has been studied to death. Try any good, serious schools agriculture dep., or ask the USDA, or just pick up acollegelevel agriculture textbook. Usually the charts you seek are in chapter 1. Now wee speak of a balanced diet. Noting also the physical need for such concepts as fallow fields, rotation and the taking into account of varied growing seasons, and of course the availability of water. You may, for entertainment wish to read "Guns, Germs and Steel" as a portion of it discusses protein yields and acerage. Regarding Human population,, yes, like on anny rabbit ffarm, maximum population size is fixed by the food (and water) supply. Starvation and disease and death follow malnutrition. Noting also that depletion of soil nutrition (which happens when one doesn't rotate or allow fallow fields) or inefficiecy in farming practices may require more land for isolated sustainability. For the family of 3, The research model does not allow trips to the store or bringing in external supplies.
Who ls Minuteman again ?

I've not seen him on here Ken but thanks for the reply

And l hope the research was time well spent #

(Not much point ln signing this then )
There's nothing wasteful about owning land and letting it return it it's natural state.



Over growth, trees, vines, bushes, bramble, insects, standing dead timber, rotting stumps....


It's called an ecosystem.



It's wasteful to trim and manicure 25 acres of land into a park for one family.


That's called sprawl.
Post Comment - Let others know what you think about this Blog.

About this Blog

by catsrus1
created Nov 2016
776 Views
Last Viewed: Apr 14
Last Commented: Nov 2016
catsrus1 has 16 other Blogs

Like this Blog?

Do you like this Blog? Why not let the Author know. Click the button to like the Blog. And your like will be added. Likes are anonymous.

Feeling Creative?