Science, and evidence....

We like to think we can have theories "proved" by sophisticated science. Sadly, the scientific method is rather a way to try to show theories are NOT correct, usually by way of careful repeated experiments. The more this is done, and a given theory resists getting dumped, the more we can safely believe in it, and use it for technology, etc. Sure, the ability of a given theory to predict things, how it fits with other observations, the logic and consistency of its parts, and much more are involved in our believing it. But doubt always remains, which is the mark of good scientists. For real proof, there's mathmatics, QED. Aa.
Post Comment

Comments (8)

Science (with the exception of Mathematics which is pure philosophy) is a way of describing observations. As long as a theory fits the observations, therefore, it is perfectly fine. You seem to be assuming that there is an underlying truth or reality but really, reality is undefined and undefinable.

In short, there is no sadness involved. On the contrary, it is rather exciting when we stumble on an observation which doesn't fit the theory because that is the telltale sign that discovery is imminent.

What science is it you do/did?
Thanks NJ. Yes, no reality is claimed by some. In this regard, I like Russsell's note on a lady logician who claimed to be a solipsist, and was surprised that others weren't. And Churchill had a nice take on science, saying that humanity does stumble onto truth in science rarely, but then goes back to bumbling on forward. My choice was Voodoo. Aa.
It actually was a serious question. What field were or are you in? Medicine or Biology I presume?
unless you don't want to reveal that info i.e.
It is a fair and a serious question. But if revealed to the CS world, I'd then have to track down and rub them all out. Life is short. I taught high school science and languages, before having too much fun collecting too many degrees, here and abroad. Aa.
Right. Interesting. Something similar here but not languages. Just cannot deal with that myself. In fact, I can't wait for Esperanto to gain some traction. Life would be so much simpler for folk like me.
Yes, its a process of disproving stuff.. Thats how we end up with Newtons law and Darwins theory.
Mathematics is always involved, as is logic etc.
In science, it is generally accepted to be wrong 1 time in 20 (p05?), whereas with humanities its generally 1 in 10 times (p10?). Its kind of a protocol so we are not comparing apples to oranges.
But realistically, what are they capable of offering?

Yeah, ok love, white with two thanks.

And I guess somebody has to do the cleaning afterwards.
Post Comment - Let others know what you think about this Blog.
Meet the Author of this Blog
Aaltarboy

Aaltarboy

Belfast, Maine, USA

Have lived/worked/studied in the USA and overseas. Life here is ideal in many ways, but am looking for a life partner who could live in several places for parts of the year, to enjoy climate and cultural variety this would bring. For this, I like the [read more]

About this Blog

created May 2017
509 Views
Last Viewed: Apr 21
Last Commented: May 2017
Aaltarboy has 167 other Blogs

Like this Blog?

Do you like this Blog? Why not let the Author know. Click the button to like the Blog. And your like will be added. Likes are anonymous.

Feeling Creative?