Nat. Geo. King Tut

While doing my work, the television was still on the Channel it was on earlier in the day, National Geographic. I don't usually watch that channel and am not very familiar with their programs. But last night, I found they had a very interesting show on having to do with King Tut and the contents of his tomb. There were a lot of things they mentioned on that show that went against common belief about the King himself. However, what I found even more interesting, they were showing items never seen before. Of these things never shown before, there were two items that just stuck out to me...and to the creators of the show also.

They each had their own sarcophagus. There were two "babies" buried with Tut.

Where do I go from here....hmm. If I only knew how to upload images of these so-called babies, I am sure one could guess where I a going.

I believe I shared this story on here once before, but here is just a quick rendition of it. About 20-ish years ago, living in the countryside of America, with my nearest neighbor about a 1/4 mile away, something dug up a single plant I had. The previous day I planted it, and surround it with vegetation...the darn thing was only 2" tall. After I was done planting it, I could not even see it myself. But, anyway, I knew the exact area it was. The next day I go out to that exact area to check on it...to only find a freshly dug hole. A hole probably 10" wide by about 8" deep...nothing huge. The dirt from the hole was sitting off to one side and in that fresh dirt was a footprint the exact shape of a human's footprint....the heal, the arch, the toes, and the wedge shape. Dumbfounded by this, I thought to myself, if this was a human that did this, most likely there should be fingertip marks on the walls of the hole. I checked that, and sure enough, there were small rounded tip marks that had scraped and running down vertically the walls of the hole.

I asked my gf if I could borrow the birth certificate of her son's....because it had his infant footprint on it. I took it out there and compared it, not only did it look identical but it was also the same size. I figured whatever dug out that hole was the size of a newborn.

Okay, now back to the show. Both of the "babies" they claim, were still born and were Tut's unborn children. I am not an expert on what stillborn babies look like. But, I have seen a couple of UFO shows in the past few years where people who claimed to have seen aliens described what they seen to artists and sketches have been drawn of those people's accounts. In my opinion, the "baby" on the right (since the only thing that really exists are photos of Tut's "unborn babies," you can see which one I am referring to) looks pretty much identical to these artist's alien drawings. The only thing that does not match, is the height of them.

The thing that baffles me...even the show creators found these never shown beings significant...why were they never shown before? In addition, why were they not better preserved? Anyway.....

Happy Monday folks.