John Muir's tears from Heaven

Historian and wonderful film maker Ken Burns stated that the single greatest achievement of the USA
was the establishment of the Natural Parks system, the first of it's kind in the entire world.
Naturalist John Muir was a key figure in both the concept and the battle of getting it finally done.
It forever preserved natural lands as a refuge for the public to appreciate the natural beauty of undisturbed undeveloped lands.

Unfortunately, several acts by the scammer-in-chief, Trump, are severely threatening OUR parks.

First Trump raised the price of admission. Then, he made it possible for companies to mine and drill for oil in the parks.
Now, he opens up preserved land in Alaska to severe barbaric extreme hunting techniques.
Yes, the ANYTHING for money lowlife president strikes again.




How anyone could support the lowlife scammer-in-chief is beyond me.
Post Comment

Comments (19)

And this is the Alaska's management plan.




Intensive Management in Alaska
Alaska's Predator Control Programs
Overview
Alaska's Programs
Research & Resources
Intensive management (IM) programs are authorized under a specific procedure where the Alaska Board of Game determines a particular ungulate population important for providing high levels of human consumptive use and sets population and harvest objectives for deer, caribou, or moose in those specific areas. Those programs are listed under Active IM Programs or Inactive IM Programs on these pages. For other prey species harvested by hunters or in other areas, the Commissioner of ADF&G may authorize predation control to recover depleted prey populations under Alaska Statute 16.05.020(2), and the Board may adopt regulations for similar purpose under AS 16.05.255(a)(6). Programs authorized under either of these authorities are listed under Other Programs.

Predation control programs, authorized under intensive management regulations, are currently active in four specific areas in Alaska, covering approximately 5% of the state's land area. These programs are designed to reduce predation by wolves or bears and increase moose, caribou, or deer populations that are a needed food source for Alaskans.

Each predation control program employs specific methods to increase sustainable ungulate harvest. In these areas, predators will be reduced but not eliminated. The goal is to reduce predation rates, allowing humans to take more ungulates while also maintaining sustainable populations of predators.

Before any predation control program begins, the Alaska Board of Game reviews the program's feasibility and proposed operation plan and then adopts a regulation to authorize the predation control if the program is approved. Those regulations, formally adopted in the Alaska Administrative Code in Title 5, Chapter 92, contain detailed information about each predation control area. You will find links to the regulation and implementation plan for each program listed here. View the entire Intensive Management and Predator Control section (5 AAC 92.106 – 5 AAC 92.127).
Here's an article about raising the fees at national parks, which are getting way over crowded.


The Interior Department is abandoning a plan to more than double entrance fees to some of the country's most popular national parks, opting instead to apply a "modest" fee increase to 117 parks beginning this summer in an effort to raise funds for park maintenance.

The announcement Thursday comes after an outcry from the public and from lawmakers, who were concerned that certain large increases that were initially proposed would price people out of the nation's parks.

The original proposal, which called for nearly tripling entrance fees to 17 of the most popular parks during their peak season, generated more than 100,000 public comments.

"I want to thank the American people who made their voices heard through the public comment process on the original fee proposal," Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke said in a statement. "Your input has helped us develop a balanced plan that focuses on modest increases at the 117 fee-charging parks as opposed to larger increases proposed for 17 highly visited national parks."

Entrance fees for vehicles will increase by $5 at the fee-charging parks, starting in June. Park-specific annual passes will also cost more, though the price will vary from park to park.

The price for the annual "America the Beautiful" pass, which allows access to most parks, and the Lifetime Senior Pass will continue to be $80.

More than two-thirds of national parks, historic sites and monuments will remain free to enter, the National Park Service says.

Official Who Allowed Tree Cutting By NFL Owner Is Named National Parks Director
THE TWO-WAY
Official Who Allowed Tree Cutting By NFL Owner Is Named National Parks Director
Here's a complete list of the fee increases.

The National Park Service has said it needs to increase entrance fees to its parks to help cover the cost of $11.6 billion in deferred maintenance in the nation's park system — a backlog that ranges from crumbling roadways and campgrounds to aging sewage systems.

The Interior Department's original proposal was projected to raise $70 million a year. Officials hoped to capitalize on record visitor numbers to hugely popular national parks like Zion, Yosemite, Yellowstone and Glacier.

The park service estimates that the new plan, once fully implemented, will increase annual entrance fee revenue by $60 million. Entrance fees reached $199 million in fiscal 2016, according to the agency.

Most of that money stays in the park where it's collected.

"Fees do have a role to play in our parks," Theresa Pierno, the president and CEO of the nonprofit advocacy group the National Parks Conservation Association, said in a statement. "he administration's move to abandon its original proposal in favor of more measured fee increases will put additional funds into enhancing park experiences without threatening visitation or local economies."

Search For Buried Treasure Linked To Illinois Man's Death At Yellowstone
THE TWO-WAY
Search For Buried Treasure Linked To Illinois Man's Death At Yellowstone
The NPCA opposed the larger fee increase when it was first proposed.

Pierno and Zinke both stated that the fee increase alone is not enough to address the park system's maintenance backlog.

Zinke is pushing Congress to pass bipartisan legislation that would use revenue from new energy development on federal land and water to address park maintenance. Zinke says the proposal could generate $18 billion for the park service over 10 years.

Pierno and the NPCA are calling on Congress to increase funding to the nation's parks.
For those who would like to sign a letter in protest of Trump's attack on the environment go here;

Modest fee increase, my a**;

Trump wanted significant fee increases;



Plus, the lifetime senior citizen pass increased from $10 to $80 ! That fee increase is not "modest".
Why not just report things honestly ......instead of trying to twist things.

The fees increases will be moderate and are needed to help cover the costs of maintaining roads and other up keep in the parks. Have you even been to a National Park lately to see how crowded they have become? They are being loved to death. $5 more per vehicle won't hurt anybody.

This from the article I linked: "Entrance fees for vehicles will increase by $5 at the fee-charging parks, starting in June. Park-specific annual passes will also cost more, though the price will vary from park to park.

The price for the annual "America the Beautiful" pass, which allows access to most parks, and the Lifetime Senior Pass will continue to be $80.

More than two-thirds of national parks, historic sites and monuments will remain free to enter, the National Park Service says.
I forgot to add I'm not in favor of drilling for oil or mining in national parks, but when all the dishonest stuff is mixed in it weakens the cause.
"Continue to be $80" ???? Before Trump is was $10.

You are twisting the facts. Trump tried to significantly increase the fees.
The public stopped it.
Yeah, MONUMENTS will still be free to see. Whoopie ! laugh
Give Trump time to figure out how to make $ for himself off of those too however,
If liberals really cared about the environment they would want to end massive immigration.

Nature ( or God if you are religious ) put predators there for a purpose. That purpose was to ensure the survival of all wildlife both predator and prey. This strategy worked for hundreds of thousands ( millions actually ) of years without any interference of any so-called experts to tell us what they think is needed. Wildlife thrived when left to its own design, but has been on the decline since we started dealing with it. The current laws are designed to stop meddling in an area that we have no business being in. Leave it as it was and stop destroying the planet and the life within it. . . . very mad . . . very mad . . . . very mad




Embedded image from another site
I care about conservation as much as anyone. I sure don't want to see animals go extinct, but it is dishonest to say this about trophy hunting to make Trump money. Alaska tries (as most states do) to manage its wildlife resources to the benefit of its residents in a sustainable manner. Native Alaskans and subsistence settlers have been granted rights to allow them to feed themselves given the unusual circumstances they live under. When there are no grocery stores to go to then hunting becomes necessary. Alaska has educated conservation officers who live there and understand sustainability, most of them are environmentalists.

Fees from hunting and fishing licenses are actually used for wildlife conservation. Balancing the needs of humans and animals isn't always easy, but it is a job better performed by experts in the field than by limousine liberals living in gated communities.
I'm not against hunting for food by reasonable means.
That is NOT what this is about. Stop TRYING to confuse things.
Shooting wolves from helicopters, caribo from mototrized boats, killing bear & wolf cubs is totally unacceptable.

You would do more good for your cause if you stuck to the facts and didn't try and make it sound like Trump came up with predator control. All he did was sign a bill passed by congress that turned predator control decisions back over to the state of Alaska. The goal of Alaska's predator control is to increase the number of caribou, moose, deer, elk herds to provide more available food for Alaskans who depend on it...…...by eliminating the numbers of predators who also kill and eat the game. They have a certain number of wolves they want reduced in certain areas and they do allow hunting from helicopters by government hunters to achieve those numbers. However this may be the last year they try this control since it hasn't lead to the increase in herd populations they had hoped for. I also read they are not going to be killing black bears for predator control this year.
...hey Jim... did somone steal youre camera...?dunno

cool wine
"All he did was sign a bill"

That's a crucial part of what presidents do. Some veto bad bills and others sign them.
Apparently deciding which is appropriate to sign and which should get a veto is beyond Trump's capability.
v - No. Did someone steal your face ? laugh
Post Comment - Let others know what you think about this Blog.

About this Blog

by JimNastics
created May 2018
901 Views
Last Viewed: Mar 29
Last Commented: May 2018
JimNastics has 1,965 other Blogs

Like this Blog?

Do you like this Blog? Why not let the Author know. Click the button to like the Blog. And your like will be added. Likes are anonymous.

Feeling Creative?