The US Senate finally concludes that Russia interferred with the election in favor of Trump.
In response to:
In rebuke to Trump, key Senate panel endorses finding that Russia attacked 2016 election
Michael Isikoff 4 hours ago
AP, Getty
WASHINGTON — The Senate Intelligence Committee, rejecting doubts conveyed by President Trump as recently as last week,
has become the latest body to officially conclude that the Russian government conducted a wide-ranging campaign — including cyberattacks —
to influence the 2016 presidential election.
An unclassified seven-page report, released by the committee Tuesday with full bipartisan support, was based on an extensive, year-and-a-half-long investigation
into the U.S. intelligence community’s January 2017 assessment that the Kremlin carried out its campaign in part
for the purpose of promoting Trump’s candidacy and discrediting Hillary Clinton.
The committee’s conclusion: The assessment, which had been ordered by President Obama, is a “sound intelligence product”
that was prepared by analysts who “were under no politically motivated pressure to reach any conclusions” and was based on a
“range of all-source reporting,” albeit much of it still classified.
The panel’s findings are hardly a surprise. All of those who have reviewed the January 2017 intelligence community assessment —
including the most senior officials of the Trump administration — have endorsed the conclusions that the Russians hacked the Democratic National Committee
and undertook a wide variety of other measures to interfere in the U.S. election.
The only outlier continues to be the president who, in a tweet written shortly after the announcement he will meet Russian President Vladimir Putin this month
at a summit in Helsinki, once again cast doubt on the findings of his own government.
…. “Russia continues to say they had nothing to with meddling in our Election!” Trump tweeted on June 28.
In his tweet, he went on to raise questions about the failure of the FBI under former Director James Comey (“Shady James Comey” he called him)
to take possession of the DNC’s server and then asked: “Why isn’t Hillary/Russia being looked at? So many questions, so much corruption.”
Whether the new report by the Senate Intelligence Committee will make any dent in the president’s view of the matter seems doubtful,
in the view of one top Russia expert. “Are you kidding?” replied John Sipher, a former deputy chief of the CIA’s Russian operations division.
“You think he’s going to listen to the senators any more than he’ll listen to his own intelligence community?”
The committee, in a press release about the report, emphasized the extent of its inquiry into the issue and the bipartisan nature of its findings.
“The committee has spent the last 16 months reviewing the sources, tradecraft and analytic work underpinning the Intelligence Community Assessment
and sees no reason to dispute the conclusions,” said Sen. Richard Burr, the panel’s Republican chairman.
Sen. Mark Warner, the committee’s Democratic vice chair, called the intelligence community findings “accurate and on point,”
adding that the Russian effort was “extensive and sophisticated.”
Indeed, the committee said that it has learned about new intelligence and analysis that has strengthened the case against the Kremlin’s election meddling,
including additional information about Russia’s attempts to infiltrate state election systems and manipulate social media platforms.
In rebuke to Trump, key Senate panel endorses finding that Russia attacked 2016 election
Michael Isikoff 4 hours ago
AP, Getty
WASHINGTON — The Senate Intelligence Committee, rejecting doubts conveyed by President Trump as recently as last week,
has become the latest body to officially conclude that the Russian government conducted a wide-ranging campaign — including cyberattacks —
to influence the 2016 presidential election.
An unclassified seven-page report, released by the committee Tuesday with full bipartisan support, was based on an extensive, year-and-a-half-long investigation
into the U.S. intelligence community’s January 2017 assessment that the Kremlin carried out its campaign in part
for the purpose of promoting Trump’s candidacy and discrediting Hillary Clinton.
The committee’s conclusion: The assessment, which had been ordered by President Obama, is a “sound intelligence product”
that was prepared by analysts who “were under no politically motivated pressure to reach any conclusions” and was based on a
“range of all-source reporting,” albeit much of it still classified.
The panel’s findings are hardly a surprise. All of those who have reviewed the January 2017 intelligence community assessment —
including the most senior officials of the Trump administration — have endorsed the conclusions that the Russians hacked the Democratic National Committee
and undertook a wide variety of other measures to interfere in the U.S. election.
The only outlier continues to be the president who, in a tweet written shortly after the announcement he will meet Russian President Vladimir Putin this month
at a summit in Helsinki, once again cast doubt on the findings of his own government.
…. “Russia continues to say they had nothing to with meddling in our Election!” Trump tweeted on June 28.
In his tweet, he went on to raise questions about the failure of the FBI under former Director James Comey (“Shady James Comey” he called him)
to take possession of the DNC’s server and then asked: “Why isn’t Hillary/Russia being looked at? So many questions, so much corruption.”
Whether the new report by the Senate Intelligence Committee will make any dent in the president’s view of the matter seems doubtful,
in the view of one top Russia expert. “Are you kidding?” replied John Sipher, a former deputy chief of the CIA’s Russian operations division.
“You think he’s going to listen to the senators any more than he’ll listen to his own intelligence community?”
The committee, in a press release about the report, emphasized the extent of its inquiry into the issue and the bipartisan nature of its findings.
“The committee has spent the last 16 months reviewing the sources, tradecraft and analytic work underpinning the Intelligence Community Assessment
and sees no reason to dispute the conclusions,” said Sen. Richard Burr, the panel’s Republican chairman.
Sen. Mark Warner, the committee’s Democratic vice chair, called the intelligence community findings “accurate and on point,”
adding that the Russian effort was “extensive and sophisticated.”
Indeed, the committee said that it has learned about new intelligence and analysis that has strengthened the case against the Kremlin’s election meddling,
including additional information about Russia’s attempts to infiltrate state election systems and manipulate social media platforms.
I wonder when (and if) Trump supporters will finally realize that they were duped by Russia & Trump.
Comments (30)
Do the senate really believe the American people can be that easily swayed by the Russians posting stuff on social media look at what was said about Trump in the lead up to the election, were people swayed it would seem not.
In general the people who voted for Trump were whites who were relatively uneducated
as compared to those who voted for Hillary.
In addition they could have voted for neither and chose someone else.
However, there are too many Russian connections for it not to be true.
That is why it is taking so long to uncover all the evidence.
Plus his son met with Russians to get "dirt on Hillary" and Trump dictated a false excuse to his son
after the fact. That's obstruction of justice. Perhaps the firing of Comey is too.
Certainly Trump also changed his story on why he fired him.
As he did on the Stormy Daniels payment.
Plus, of course there is this;
I do not trust Putin nor Trump and for valid reasons.
It will be interesting to see what evidence is collected against him.
My guess is they will not be able to prove collusion beyond a shadow of a doubt,
but they will be able to provide enough evidence of illegal money laundering.
All they have to do, is follow the money.
So far, he hasn't done enough harm to interrupt the Obama recovery from the horrible US recession.
However, the person who used the fear tactics was Trump. His campaign was rooted in fear of minorities
while promising to build a great wall, that Mexico was going to pay for.
And the uneducated dolts ate it up.
The spy was simply attempting to answer a question. He didn't even know who his client was.
became the Republican nominee.
For anyone who was stupid enough to believed that Trump was going to build a great wall and
that Mexico was going to pay for it, the word dolt is accurately applicable.
I am joyfully in the public most days and do not plan on changing that.
Sorry that you live in a less informed society.
@ Z-Man!
Could have something to do with your AV-Program!
I still hear people today repeating the propaganda that Putin had disseminated as fact, despite it being false.
When people of lower intelligence hear things repeated over & over, they tend to believe them, no matter how false they are.
Fine. Next time a Democrat wins, nuke Russia.
That sounds a mite extreme, Ken.
Hardening/securing the DNC systems to prevent future hacking would be easier.
Frankly -
Any major political party should've been savvy enough to do so in the 1st place.
And they got what was coming.
Failure to anticipate it's possibility/probability raises questions whether that party is competent to hold the Presidency.
It's a competency issue. IMO.
"Jan 10, 2017 · Russia Hacked 'Older' Republican Emails, FBI Director Says..."
Older Emails were hacked?
Newer ones concerning a National election were less easily hacked?
One NC managed damage control more competently?
Again, a competence issue.
Note also the date.
It's old news.
We might safely presume both have dealt with it.
We're flogging a dead horse.
Hacking & cyber security is in a mode of flux. It's a constantly changing battle.
Hopefully both NCs will get - and stay - ahead of the curve.