To the hackers of CS - Double posts and how to rid CS of them (41)
What gets me are the double threads 
Keeps playing deja vu with my head 
Keeps playing deja vu with my head ------ This thread is Archived ------
I am certain now there is a virus in the IM of CS.
Its called:" Oh my God No Way."
Its a high pitched voice you hear...
Just thaught I warn you.
Its called:" Oh my God No Way."
Its a high pitched voice you hear...
Just thaught I warn you.
------ This thread is Archived ------
rodolpho: I am certain now there is a virus in the IM of CS.
Its called:" Oh my God No Way."
Its a high pitched voice you hear...Just thought I warn you.
Its called:" Oh my God No Way."
Its a high pitched voice you hear...Just thought I warn you.
I have the perfect remedy for it here.
------ This thread is Archived ------
mike69spain: I have the perfect remedy for it here.
cool 
------ This thread is Archived ------
------ This thread is Archived ------
Oh my God No Way,
Merky?! It's you? Your new picture is spectacular
Merky?! It's you? Your new picture is spectacular
------ This thread is Archived ------
mike69spain: How much more strain would a "compare post to previous by same user" add to the servers?
It's just not necessary to have the issue of double posts, since they are due to delay over the net and the user clicking twice or more on the Post button.
If it is too much, why not change the code to deactivate the Post button as soon as it have been clicked once?
The latter is less precise, a post could get lost, why I think a simple content comparison between last post and sent post would be the best solution.
It will in the end save DB space, energy, and ultimately some trees somewhere.
It's just not necessary to have the issue of double posts, since they are due to delay over the net and the user clicking twice or more on the Post button.
If it is too much, why not change the code to deactivate the Post button as soon as it have been clicked once?
The latter is less precise, a post could get lost, why I think a simple content comparison between last post and sent post would be the best solution.
It will in the end save DB space, energy, and ultimately some trees somewhere.
Ok Mike....I think you have way to much time on your hands.....someone give that guy a spade.....
------ This thread is Archived ------
stefonline: Ok Mike....I think you have way to much time on your hands.....someone give that guy a spade.....
oh yeah and double click....click clicks......
------ This thread is Archived ------
Double posts - deja vu - at least it helps refresh my memory - great picture mike.
------ This thread is Archived ------
mike69spain: How much more strain would a "compare post to previous by same user" add to the servers?
It's just not necessary to have the issue of double posts, since they are due to delay over the net and the user clicking twice or more on the Post button.
If it is too much, why not change the code to deactivate the Post button as soon as it have been clicked once?
The latter is less precise, a post could get lost, why I think a simple content comparison between last post and sent post would be the best solution.
It will in the end save DB space, energy, and ultimately some trees somewhere.
Awesome suggestion, Mike. I find double threads and double or triple posts annoying, but I do understand that the people it happens to find it embarrassing, too. Having the post button deactivate as soon as it's hit once would be a brilliant way to stop this aggravation for us all. It's just not necessary to have the issue of double posts, since they are due to delay over the net and the user clicking twice or more on the Post button.
If it is too much, why not change the code to deactivate the Post button as soon as it have been clicked once?
The latter is less precise, a post could get lost, why I think a simple content comparison between last post and sent post would be the best solution.
It will in the end save DB space, energy, and ultimately some trees somewhere.
------ This thread is Archived ------
druidess6308: Awesome suggestion, Mike. I find double threads and double or triple posts annoying, but I do understand that the people it happens to find it embarrassing, too. Having the post button deactivate as soon as it's hit once would be a brilliant way to stop this aggravation for us all.
It's usually not intentional. It doesn't really bother me, just a second chance to read the message
------ This thread is Archived ------
druidess6308: Awesome suggestion, Mike. I find double threads and double or triple posts annoying, but I do understand that the people it happens to find it embarrassing, too. Having the post button deactivate as soon as it's hit once would be a brilliant way to stop this aggravation for us all.
Just to clarify on double, triple or more posts....some computers when you hit the post reply click sometimes it clicks a number of times resulting in multiple posts.....no one means to do this it has happened to me on a coule of occasions I cant expalin why but it was never intentional and I imagine the same happens to others....
------ This thread is Archived ------
mike69spain: Sarcastic comments is not under proprietary laws, anyone can use them, me too.
As for the actual problem, it only occurs sometimes when the post function does not manage to "bounce back" to your browser in time, caused by lag of some kind.
I never tried to recreate it, but when on a very slow connection, I need to have two windows open, one where I check if the post went through, apart from the message window.
All in all, this post was not so much for the public as it was a suggestion to the CS programmers.
As for the actual problem, it only occurs sometimes when the post function does not manage to "bounce back" to your browser in time, caused by lag of some kind.
I never tried to recreate it, but when on a very slow connection, I need to have two windows open, one where I check if the post went through, apart from the message window.
All in all, this post was not so much for the public as it was a suggestion to the CS programmers.
I was'nt being sarcastic......and I have posted much of what you said in my previous post....
------ This thread is Archived ------
Laura25: Oh my God No Way,
Merky?! It's you? Your new picture is spectacular
Merky?! It's you? Your new picture is spectacular
Hello pretty lady! Hope you have a good weekend! (and TY)
------ This thread is Archived ------
stefonline: Just to clarify on double, triple or more posts....some computers when you hit the post reply click sometimes it clicks a number of times resulting in multiple posts.....no one means to do this it has happened to me on a coule of occasions I cant expalin why but it was never intentional and I imagine the same happens to others....
------ This thread is Archived ------
stefonline: Just to clarify on double, triple or more posts....some computers when you hit the post reply click sometimes it clicks a number of times resulting in multiple posts.....no one means to do this it has happened to me on a coule of occasions I cant expalin why but it was never intentional and I imagine the same happens to others....
I understand that it's never intentional, and why it happens is above my technical skill...but apparently Mike is tech-savvy enough to understand why and is offering a suggestion to the site programmers. I think it's a good one. He wasn't criticizing anyone here, nor was I.
And I wish I could skip over those multiple posts without reading them, but I'm such a fast reader that while I'm skipping them, I'm reading them.
(Just a little side note about me, and one of my oddities.)------ This thread is Archived ------
stefonline: I was'nt being sarcastic......and I have posted much of what you said in my previous post....
Yes I saw that. Which adds weight to the theory.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Hi Merky, I love your new photo it's very pretty....
------ This thread is Archived ------
stefonline: Hi Merky, I love your new photo it's very pretty....
Well TY too pretty lady 2!
------ This thread is Archived ------
This Thread is Archived
This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
« Go back to All Threads
« Go back to All Threads
More Threads
Trump Elementary
The GOP Representatives owned by Vladimir Putin
Democrats destroyed America
One week of the most outrageous GOP leadership!
The weird and the random facts around the world
Iran- Israel war
Would you hire this guy - for any job?
Trump on Trial
Gal / sdarlagg passed away on April 10, 2024
Why is this shameful?
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
Stats for this Thread
1,245 Views
40 Comments
Created: Jul 2009
Last Viewed: Apr 21
Last Commented: Jul 2009
0 Likes
Related Forums
- Trump Elementary
- The GOP Representatives owned by Vladimir Putin
- Democrats destroyed America
- One week of the most outrageous GOP leadership!
- The weird and the random facts around the world
- Iran- Israel war
- Would you hire this guy - for any job?
- Trump on Trial
- Gal / sdarlagg passed away on April 10, 2024
- Why is this shameful?
It's just not necessary to have the issue of double posts, since they are due to delay over the net and the user clicking twice or more on the Post button.
If it is too much, why not change the code to deactivate the Post button as soon as it have been clicked once?
The latter is less precise, a post could get lost, why I think a simple content comparison between last post and sent post would be the best solution.
It will in the end save DB space, energy, and ultimately some trees somewhere.