Hello buds--I have been thinking about writing an editorial to one of our local newspapers concerning a human-interest story. The skinny on it: a nice, well meaning young man has been plugging meters in an urban downtown area. He had a verbal confrontation with the peace officer (a woman) and was of course, cited for interfering with city business. He has requested an advisory jury, which is unusual in a case that would normally not warrant this type of hearing. Now, I'm a very liberal once-upon-a-time beatnik sort, so my maverick view of the world makes me want to take his side. However, I also have to agree with the city because this action, similar to many other civil misdemeanors, is really unquestionably belligerent and confrontational. (If we run a stop sign, we get a ticket. If we go faster than the posted speed, we get a ticket...and so on) I fully understand that he was trying to be a good guy, and help others by preventing their cars from being towed or ticketed, but the meters are clearly posted that one is not to park longer than 2 hours. This is a fairness issue for a cosmopolitan area, where parking is at a premium. Your thoughts, please? thank you
Our town has recently tried to implement the 2-hour parking limit around the stores in the major parts of the town. Of course it was met with all the negative comments and even the store owners are trying to get it repealed. One of the main reasons it was started was because the employees were parking in the choice spots all day while they were at work. There are no meters and cars are marked the old fashioned way: chalk on the tires. I'm not sure how to resolve an issue like this.
newinsouth: Our town has recently tried to implement the 2-hour parking limit around the stores in the major parts of the town. Of course it was met with all the negative comments and even the store owners are trying to get it repealed. One of the main reasons it was started was because the employees were parking in the choice spots all day while they were at work. There are no meters and cars are marked the old fashioned way: chalk on the tires. I'm not sure how to resolve an issue like this.
I know- and since posting this I talked to a civil employee here I just happen to know a little. She feels that it should not matter who, what, where, when or how, as long as the meter has money in it. She does not think it should matter how long---my problem is that , whether you like it or not, it is clearly POSTED that any one car cannot exceed the two hours. To contrast this, think of a similar legal situation: When driving, even the police will tell you that "slower traffic moves to the right". (You cannot bogart the far left lane-and must leave it open for cars going faster). Of course the argument (which I totally agree with) is that the sign does not say, "Speed Limit 55 ((except for a**hole in the left lane")) now does it?? Know what I mean?
rohaan: I know- and since posting this I talked to a civil employee here I just happen to know a little. She feels that it should not matter who, what, where, when or how, as long as the meter has money in it. She does not think it should matter how long---my problem is that , whether you like it or not, it is clearly POSTED that any one car cannot exceed the two hours. To contrast this, think of a similar legal situation: When driving, even the police will tell you that "slower traffic moves to the right". (You cannot bogart the far left lane-and must leave it open for cars going faster). Of course the argument (which I totally agree with) is that the sign does not say, "Speed Limit 55 ((except for a**hole in the left lane")) now does it?? Know what I mean?
Then I guess technically, if everyone was going 55 there should not be anyone in that far left lane. And if they were in that lane and going 55, they should NOT get a ticket.
newinsouth: Then I guess technically, if everyone was going 55 there should not be anyone in that far left lane. And if they were in that lane and going 55, they should NOT get a ticket.
You got it--but of course it doesn't work that way. I'm just ornery enough to want to say to the guy in the left lane, "Hey, I agree that it's technically a passing lane. So why don't YOU get out of it, too? (got it?)
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).