Why should any country be sanctiond by another for trying to creat neucs by a country that already has them? This doesn't mean I aprove, just if one is repremanded so should the other, SUPER POWER or not.
VeritaasLondon, Greater London, England UK5,839 posts
mesteve: Why should any country be sanctiond by another for trying to creat neucs by a country that already has them? This doesn't mean I aprove, just if one is repremanded so should the other, SUPER POWER or not.
Because they could be seen as a threat to the rest of the world, especially in countries of political unrest.
mesteve: Why should any country be sanctiond by another for trying to creat neucs by a country that already has them? This doesn't mean I aprove, just if one is repremanded so should the other, SUPER POWER or not.
Raynew1959Barrington, New Hampshire USA2,218 posts
mesteve: Why should any country be sanctiond by another for trying to creat neucs by a country that already has them? This doesn't mean I aprove, just if one is repremanded so should the other, SUPER POWER or not.
I'm guessing you mean countries such as North Korea and Iran being sanctioned.
Take a good look at their leadership, one is run by a madman and the other by a bunch of fanatics. Both would threaten to use or would use those nukes if they don't get what they want.
sorry everyone this was my first time on and didnt allow time to stick around to make further comments. im still not sure how this goes, but i think i missed the point i was trying to get across, the point being the only country that has ever used a neuc and still has a bucket load of them, is the one with the most influence in these sanctions
AlbertaghostCultural Wasteland, Alberta Canada5,914 posts
mesteve: sorry everyone this was my first time on and didnt allow time to stick around to make further comments. im still not sure how this goes, but i think i missed the point i was trying to get across, the point being the only country that has ever used a neuc and still has a bucket load of them, is the one with the most influence in these sanctions
ya. They actually created that bomb to use it on another country to stop a war that would have killed millions instead of a hundred thousand. If there was an a**hole bomb that would simply take out same then we could all get rid of a**hole regimes such as the ones you speak of but,there isn't so we just try to stop them from getting them.
mesteve: sorry everyone this was my first time on and didnt allow time to stick around to make further comments. im still not sure how this goes, but i think i missed the point i was trying to get across, the point being the only country that has ever used a neuc and still has a bucket load of them, is the one with the most influence in these sanctions
But did you know that the country you are talking about and the other superpower have agreed to have a limit of these weapons..and both countries will be reducing their numbers?
Of course there are sanctions and so there should be when you get unstable countries and crackpot leaders with nukes.
Jun 15, 2010 3:11 AM CST sanctions and neucs vers countries with neucs
emannigolJossakin Pirkanmaalla, Southern Finland Finland356 Posts
emannigolJossakin Pirkanmaalla, Southern Finland Finland356 posts
Albertaghost: ya. They actually created that bomb to use it on another country to stop a war that would have killed millions instead of a hundred thousand.
mesteve: Why should any country be sanctiond by another for trying to creat neucs by a country that already has them? This doesn't mean I aprove, just if one is repremanded so should the other, SUPER POWER or not.
You're right! There's no reason why the super-powers should be considered more responsible than other countries. Their history doesn't support that claim. Controlling nukes should involve disarming the superpowers if other nations are forbidden to develop nukes.
Just one more issue pushing the world toward world government.
We have arrived at the realization that even the super powers can no longer be trusted with nuclear weapons. There use to be a trust between individual leaders, which is no longer capable of assurance. The degradation of the political systems, the degradation of up, and coming politicians, can no longer be an assurance that responsible individuals will be at the helm. It is all pie in the sky, theoretic geniuses, who I would not trust with a rubber band, and paper clip.
If you think about it nuclear bombs have been pretty successful...
Take the amount of bombs out there...
Most likely there are roughly 70,000 nuclear bombs in the world. The exact number is unknown, due to military secrecy.
The US has the most (or atleast the most documented)- estimates project that the US has 33,000 and the former USSR has around 16,000. Both nations continue to keep many in storage. Great Britain, France, China, India, Pakistan, and Israel among many other nations are known to possess these bombs.
Under the Constitution of Japan the country has voluntarily banned itself from ever owning such a destructive weapon.
so it has been used only twice and that country that it was used against has now banned them from thier military ...
Costapacket: You have the right to say what you like, you view will be answered te same as everybody elses, this is the good thing about freedom of speech.
mesteve: Why should any country be sanctiond by another for trying to creat neucs by a country that already has them? This doesn't mean I aprove, just if one is repremanded so should the other, SUPER POWER or not.
You're right! There's no reason why the super-powers should be considered more responsible than other countries. Their history doesn't support that claim. Controlling nukes should involve disarming the superpowers if other nations are forbidden to develop nukes.
Just one more issue pushing the world toward world government.
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
This doesn't mean I aprove, just if one is repremanded so should the other, SUPER POWER or not.