A consortium of Governments and insurance companies have proposed that North Queensland be permanently evacuated due to the risk to life and property posed by flood and cyclone. What are your thoughts?
awesome71Sawtell, New South Wales Australia2,927 posts
Hey uwm I haven't heard this,it does seem unusal to put such a proposal forward.If this was the case they would have to evacuate half the planet.I know the floods and cyclones have been devastating,but doesn't compare to the loss of life and property on our roads each year.
thanks shell Ive been all over googles like a rash trying to find info on this. I was thinking that is frigin crazy what are the poor people meant to do.
sxc666: thanks shell Ive been all over googles like a rash trying to find info on this. I was thinking that is frigin crazy what are the poor people meant to do.
they have to get up early to put one over this little black duck...
awesome71: Hey uwm I haven't heard this,it does seem unusal to put such a proposal forward.If this was the case they would have to evacuate half the planet.I know the floods and cyclones have been devastating,but doesn't compare to the loss of life and property on our roads each year.
They are also talking about banning cars and trucks throughout Australia Awe LOL
Great Idea, would allow rainforests to regenerate and certainly lower our carbon footprint possibly to the level that we wouldnt require a carbon tax... I fail to understand why structures continually are built on fault lines and areas of high probable danger... a fools paradise
Hi , As a thought tho we have the same probs in Christchurch built on a bog & yes they wont to rebuild there in the zone , I was there in the 60 s working there & we went down 35 feet & its all bog the other buildings were coming to meet in the middle so they stoped to shore up the other buildsings to carry on work. building its time to move away from the center & build 15 miles westof ch ch , oh well will see, & yes we are on shaky ground.
noeleena: Hi , As a thought tho we have the same probs in Christchurch built on a bog & yes they wont to rebuild there in the zone , I was there in the 60 s working there & we went down 35 feet & its all bog the other buildings were coming to meet in the middle so they stoped to shore up the other buildsings to carry on work. building its time to move away from the center & build 15 miles westof ch ch , oh well will see, & yes we are on shaky ground.
...noeleena...
Ae, if the gold coast should ever have an earth quake, and, it is built on sand, well those in the hinterland will have shore side views.
Who nows what would happen to Napier, NZ, the earthquake in 1931 raised the ground....... and it is on the ring of fire.
CuspofMagic: Great Idea, would allow rainforests to regenerate and certainly lower our carbon footprint possibly to the level that we wouldnt require a carbon tax... I fail to understand why structures continually are built on fault lines and areas of high probable danger... a fools paradise
Pssst, Cuspo...Half of Adelaide is built on fault lines, including the area my parents as well as myself, live in. Thanks to Colonel Light Yep, a man of vision!
Errrr....aren't we supposed be expecting a major earthquake here this year?
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).