I was in a online relationship recently with a friend from elementary school. So we already knew each other, but we had not seen each other for maybe 15 years. We were planning to see each other with my next visit back home in California. She was always so private about so many things, but the more I got to know her, the more I understood she was not for me. The idea is that if you don't ask or talk about the tough questions, you won't know anything about the person---you'll just be fed what he or she wants you to hear--like only happy and positive things or things that may only reflect your interests. I found it very discouraging when this woman did not feel some need to talk/expand when she was feeling at her best.
Excerpt from the article:
"In both offline and online romantic relationships, understanding your partner's mind is complex and involves much more than merely reading faces or messages; it involves paying attention to many subtle cues. This is especially true in online communication, where there are fewer sources of information. Reading your partner's mind in online communication consists of reading both the lines and between the lines. The kinds of words chosen, the speed of the response, the length and frequency of messages are all cues to your partner's perception of the type and quality of the relationship. Thus, a fast response indicates great interest, whereas a slow response may suggest lack of enthusiasm."
"Online romantic relationships should complement, but not substitute for, offline relationships."
"The interesting question is what happens when lovers combine their online and offline relationships. In fact, the less information people have online makes the chances of a successful first face-to-face meeting very low (according to one survey, merely 10%), because the two people may not "click"."
Interesting topic, for which I think the more that we understand ourselves, we are able to recognize who is a better partner for ourselves in the future, or whether we ourselves are ready for a relationship.
langleygirl: Interesting topic, for which I think the more that we understand ourselves, we are able to recognize who is a better partner for ourselves in the future, or whether we ourselves are ready for a relationship.
So true! Great contribution langleygirl! We have to be true to ourselves (the Self), always! I should say that I held on a bit too long with this woman because she was so beautiful haha! Well, more info came eventually, and let's just say I realized this woman was not emotionally independent and stable--plus she was way too Christian for me--and I was too spiritually different for her. We had some interesting arguments over something that can't be defined objectively, like about the God concept.
I agree, whether just in friendship or more I try to get to know the person as much as possible and like to talk about all aspects of life and if I run into someone who is only interested in communicating when things are wonderful and happy and disappear when real like happens and isnt always hunky dory than i know they are not as genuinely interested in friendship or anything else
gemeh22: I agree, whether just in friendship or more I try to get to know the person as much as possible and like to talk about all aspects of life and if I run into someone who is only interested in communicating when things are wonderful and happy and disappear when real like happens and isnt always hunky dory than i know they are not as genuinely interested in friendship or anything else
Whoops "real life" not real like consistently slow responses shows lack of interest as well in my book- if online at same time - jmo
Ccincy: Offline or online you can know someone for along time and still not know them.
Offline, I think you can get a better idea with a better sense of that person that you have known for a long time. Of course, nothing is as unsure as a sure thing. I think it depends how much you really want to know the person--and some intuition helps. True though, you can't know the person since you are not the person, and that is when assumption can go bad! Knowing a person is ever expanding.
gemeh22: I agree, whether just in friendship or more I try to get to know the person as much as possible and like to talk about all aspects of life and if I run into someone who is only interested in communicating when things are wonderful and happy and disappear when real like happens and isnt always hunky dory than i know they are not as genuinely interested in friendship or anything else
Yep! It's like they use you, to fill a void, when it suits them.
StressFree: So true! Great contribution langleygirl! We have to be true to ourselves (the Self), always! I should say that I held on a bit too long with this woman because she was so beautiful haha! Well, more info came eventually, and let's just say I realized this woman was not emotionally independent and stable--plus she was way too Christian for me--and I was too spiritually different for her. We had some interesting arguments over something that can't be defined objectively, like about the God concept.
I took a test on POF for what type of man I really wanted (in their opinion) and it was an Adonis (someone to take care of me). Seems kinda funny to me in a way because I've been so independent for so many years ..... but then again, when I think of it, I do desire a strong man to lead. So maybe there is some truth in that. The things we discover about ourselves, or at least need to explore to see if there is some measure of truth for ourselves.
For myself, I think I'd also choose someone with at least some semblance of the same truths for core values as well. If you are totally at odds with someone (while you can still respect them) I think there is no common grounds for the foundations of a relationship.
langleygirl: I took a test on POF for what type of man I really wanted (in their opinion) and it was an Adonis (someone to take care of me). Seems kinda funny to me in a way because I've been so independent for so many years ..... but then again, when I think of it, I do desire a strong man to lead. So maybe there is some truth in that. The things we discover about ourselves, or at least need to explore to see if there is some measure of truth for ourselves.
For myself, I think I'd also choose someone with at least some semblance of the same truths for core values as well. If you are totally at odds with someone (while you can still respect them) I think there is no common grounds for the foundations of a relationship.
Yah,ditto , great topic!I have just been talking to someone and there issue,I,m finding is they lead a double life,and yah do answer slowly like there planning there next reply and then have something to do when a question is asked or pretend there computers actting up!But, if they think your getting upset then it,s love love love!Usely, these I find are profile stealers and construction travelers!And, the women are either russian,nigerian,or the like!Mine, I think is a past scammer after money!or, getting me off the back of a friend scammer cus, I got burn,t once!
..."The interesting question is what happens when lovers combine their online and offline relationships. In fact, the less information people have online makes the chances of a successful first face-to-face meeting very low (according to one survey, merely 10%), because the two people may not "click"."
There are people who meet their online interest in RL and are so different, with so little in common, that they really had no business meeting in the first place, IMO.
It's been said that internet dating is like dating in reverse and I agree; you tackle the big issues, discuss what you want and don't want, agree you like the basics and then meet to see if there's a spark. I'm always surprised when people arrange to meet someone they've barely chatted to and no next to nothing about.
daisy333: There are people who meet their online interest in RL and are so different, with so little in common, that they really had no business meeting in the first place, IMO.
It's been said that internet dating is like dating in reverse and I agree; you tackle the big issues, discuss what you want and don't want, agree you like the basics and then meet to see if there's a spark. I'm always surprised when people arrange to meet someone they've barely chatted to and no next to nothing about.
I always get to know the person somewhat online through a serious of mails before I take things to the next level---like Skype!!! or the telephone for me....
I didn't realize people could be online lovers. I would never consider myself dating someone unless we had actually DATED...face-to-face...complete with snogging. :)
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
I was in a online relationship recently with a friend from elementary school. So we already knew each other, but we had not seen each other for maybe 15 years. We were planning to see each other with my next visit back home in California. She was always so private about so many things, but the more I got to know her, the more I understood she was not for me. The idea is that if you don't ask or talk about the tough questions, you won't know anything about the person---you'll just be fed what he or she wants you to hear--like only happy and positive things or things that may only reflect your interests. I found it very discouraging when this woman did not feel some need to talk/expand when she was feeling at her best.
Excerpt from the article:
"In both offline and online romantic relationships, understanding your partner's mind is complex and involves much more than merely reading faces or messages; it involves paying attention to many subtle cues. This is especially true in online communication, where there are fewer sources of information. Reading your partner's mind in online communication consists of reading both the lines and between the lines. The kinds of words chosen, the speed of the response, the length and frequency of messages are all cues to your partner's perception of the type and quality of the relationship. Thus, a fast response indicates great interest, whereas a slow response may suggest lack of enthusiasm."
"Online romantic relationships should complement, but not substitute for, offline relationships."
"The interesting question is what happens when lovers combine their online and offline relationships. In fact, the less information people have online makes the chances of a successful first face-to-face meeting very low (according to one survey, merely 10%), because the two people may not "click"."