DID YOU SEE THE PLANE THAT HIT THE PENTAGONE ? ( Archived) (42)

Eighty floors up is not exactly treetop level. But one thing about Manahttan is that you really can't see the sky in any direction, especially from the street. You have to look straight up to see the sky and if you do that you'll get run over in a second. So it's actually the ideal place for such a scam. A few fake videos released immediately after the explosions and people imagine they've seen something that really didn't happen.

what crap

Nobody is suggesting they did it without media. On the contrary, the media is even more a part of all this than the government.

The government controls laws, but the media controls minds.


Ok lets examine your supposed "proof" video, shall we?

I googled "911 diane sawyer" and this video came up.
It's was aired on 911.



Let's see how much fakery we can find involving the supposed 2nd plane.

The first "plane" clip starts at 1:29 and continues to 1:34 (5 seconds). It's called the Fairbanks video after the photographer who supposedly filmed it. It supposedly occurred during an interview of an FBI agent by an amateur photographer on the street near the WTC and, just by luck, caught the (supposed) plane hitting the second tower.

But it's a total fake for many reasons.

First, the camera angle doesn't exist.

Many photographers have gone to the exact same place and tried (using all sorts of lenses) to duplicate the camera angle of the video's background. But they found it to be impossible. The only way to duplicate the supposed camera angle is by a composite of different images. Studio fakery.

And guess what. In the video itself there is absolute proof that such fakery was in progress.

In truth the video involves a fake background still photo green- screened behind a studio-filmed "interview" and superimposed footage of the plane and fireball photo-shopped in.

here's a still from that video.


Look just above the guys arm. There are two video monitors visible. One contains a clip of the plane impact. The other contains a clip of the supposed fireball that erupts after the impact.

Of course that implies that either the guy has already set up cameras trained on the 2nd building (if the planes were real) or he has some footage of the plane and explosion to be mixed into a the faked street scene.

Watch the video again and concentrate on these two monitors. You'll see the plane footage in the first and the fireball footage in the second.

Now think, why would they have the two cameras and two monitors filming not the building that is already in flames but the (as yet) untouched building?

And in the less than 23 minutes between the explosion at the first tower and that of the second, would an amateur photographer have the time to set up at least three cameras and two monitors and a mixing device (visible) out on the sidewalk, and then find a passing FBI agent to question and (using an impossible camera angle) catch the supposed second "plane" in the process.


All that fakery in a 5 second video clip.

I think I'll have to do this in several posts.
So I'll break here.

To be continued.

Look again.