IS YOUR WIFI SAFE? WHY IS NORTH CAROLINA PUSHING WIFI ON ALL? DEPOP.... (5)
Legend905Charlotte, North Carolina USA38 Threads 149 PostsAS A DIRECT RESULT OF MY COMPUTER SOFTWARE DETECTION, POSTING THIS TOPIC CAME WITH A BIT OF A HASSLE. MAC IP ADDRESSES FROM ROAD RUNNER IN HERNDON, VA.; A SECLUDED BUILDING IN GREENSBORO, NC.; AND FROM DOWNTOWN HIGH POINT, NC HAVE BEEN TRYING TO BREAK INTO MY COMPUTER DAILY NOW. I MEAN THEY GET SO DEEP WEBPAGES MOVE ON THEIR OWN. BUT THIS STORY MUST BE TOLD. FOR A WHILE THE HOSPITALS IN GREENSBORO, HIGH POINT, WINSTON SALEM, CHARLOTTE AND OTHER CITIES AND TOWNS IN NORTH CAROLINA WERE/ARE RECIEVING COUNTLESS PATIENTS AS A DIRECT RESULT OF WIFI RADIATION. THERE IS ALOT OF X-RAYS GOING MISSING TO CONFIRM THIS, AMONG OTHER THINGS. THIS IS A VERY SECRETIVE ISSUE. NOT LONG AGO A FRIEND OF MINE NAME SCOTT ASHLEY HAD TO GO TO THE HOSPITAL FOR AN AILMENT.
------ This thread is Archived ------
The guy in this video is Barrie Trower -
a scientist who worked for the British Military Intelligence for 11 years and he specialized in microwave and stealth weapons.
You can also listen to our Mum's excellent teleseminar with Dr. Magda Havas PhD, where they discuss microwave radiation in our homes, schools, and how to protect ourselves.
1. Children's brains are way smaller, so it affects us way more. And we have more water in children's brains so electromagnetic radiation is conducted faster and stronger.
"Of particular significance for children are studies which indicate that children absorb more radiation in the brain than adults which may indicate a greater risk of brain tumours."
"A two-minute cell phone call alters a child’s brain function for an hour."
(Source: The child scrambler - What a mobile can do to a youngster’s brain in 2
minutes, UK Sunday Mirror, April 1, 2004.)
2. Cell phones have up to 2.4 ghz frequency, but wireless can have up to 6 ghz frequency. But scientists say it is not the frequency that is so important, but the second carrier wave (the information carrying radio wave - ICRW) and the fact that it is pulsed, that is the main health problem. All these countries have banned wifi in schools, why can't we?
"The Public Health Department of Salzburg has warned that WiFi should not be put in schools or nurseries. The Austrian Medical Association is lobbying against the deployment of WiFi in schools."
"The Bavarian Parliament has recommended that no schools in the province use wireless LAN networks. The Frankfurt City Government said that it would not install WiFi in its schools until it had been shown to be harmless."
"Professor Johansson at the Department of Neuroscience at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm has sent a letter advising against the use of WiFi to Swedish School Governors."
3. Children absorb more radiation than adults, so the risk for kids is much higher than for adults.
"The Stewart Report (2000) states that children absorb more energy per Kg of body weight from an external electromagnetic field than do adults."
and
"A 5 year old will absorb around 60% more than an adult."
"Exposures in bone marrow may be up to ten times greater in children than adults." (Microwave news, 2008, 22nd July)
4. Radiation disturbs our learning and damages our brain function.
"Scientists have discovered that a call lasting just two minutes on a cell phone can alter the natural electrical activity of a child's brain for up to an hour afterwards.
And they also found for the first time how radio waves from mobile phones penetrate deep into the brain and not just around the ear.
The study by Spanish scientists has prompted leading medical experts to question whether it is safe for children to use mobile phones at all.
a scientist who worked for the British Military Intelligence for 11 years and he specialized in microwave and stealth weapons.
You can also listen to our Mum's excellent teleseminar with Dr. Magda Havas PhD, where they discuss microwave radiation in our homes, schools, and how to protect ourselves.
1. Children's brains are way smaller, so it affects us way more. And we have more water in children's brains so electromagnetic radiation is conducted faster and stronger.
"Of particular significance for children are studies which indicate that children absorb more radiation in the brain than adults which may indicate a greater risk of brain tumours."
"A two-minute cell phone call alters a child’s brain function for an hour."
(Source: The child scrambler - What a mobile can do to a youngster’s brain in 2
minutes, UK Sunday Mirror, April 1, 2004.)
2. Cell phones have up to 2.4 ghz frequency, but wireless can have up to 6 ghz frequency. But scientists say it is not the frequency that is so important, but the second carrier wave (the information carrying radio wave - ICRW) and the fact that it is pulsed, that is the main health problem. All these countries have banned wifi in schools, why can't we?
"The Public Health Department of Salzburg has warned that WiFi should not be put in schools or nurseries. The Austrian Medical Association is lobbying against the deployment of WiFi in schools."
"The Bavarian Parliament has recommended that no schools in the province use wireless LAN networks. The Frankfurt City Government said that it would not install WiFi in its schools until it had been shown to be harmless."
"Professor Johansson at the Department of Neuroscience at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm has sent a letter advising against the use of WiFi to Swedish School Governors."
3. Children absorb more radiation than adults, so the risk for kids is much higher than for adults.
"The Stewart Report (2000) states that children absorb more energy per Kg of body weight from an external electromagnetic field than do adults."
and
"A 5 year old will absorb around 60% more than an adult."
"Exposures in bone marrow may be up to ten times greater in children than adults." (Microwave news, 2008, 22nd July)
4. Radiation disturbs our learning and damages our brain function.
"Scientists have discovered that a call lasting just two minutes on a cell phone can alter the natural electrical activity of a child's brain for up to an hour afterwards.
And they also found for the first time how radio waves from mobile phones penetrate deep into the brain and not just around the ear.
The study by Spanish scientists has prompted leading medical experts to question whether it is safe for children to use mobile phones at all.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Doctors fear that disturbed brain activity in children could lead to psychiatric and behavioural problems or impair learning ability.
It was the first time that human guinea pigs were used to measure the effects of mobile phone radiation on children. The tests were carried out on an 11-year-old boy and a 13-year-old girl called Jennifer."
(*The child scrambler–What a mobile can do to a youngster’s brain in 2 minutes”, UK Sunday Mirror, April 1, 2004.)
You may wonder what this has to do with WiFi - well, WiFi is THREE TIMES stronger than cell phone radiation
5. People getting sick from WiFi radiation today have exactly the same things wrong with their body as the radar operators during World War 2 - when they were using the same microwave radiation to find out where the enemy planes were.
"What you need to know is that our federal guidelines are based on a thermal (heating) effect. If the radiation doesn't heat your body it is assumed to be safe. This is NOT true. We now have plenty of scientific evidence showing that we have adverse biological and health effects at levels well below the thermal guidelines.
Microwave radiation was used for the first time during the 2nd world war as radar, locating enemy aircrafts. We are now using the same frequencies to heat our food (microwave ovens), to make phone calls (cell phones and cordless phones), to listen to our babies (wireless baby monitors), to connect to the internet (WiFi and wireless routers), to submit our electricity usage (smart meters), to protect our homes (wireless monitors) . . .
There is only so much of this radiation that people can tolerate before they become sick, and people are becoming sick. The illness is called electrohypersensitivity (EHS) and is virtually identical to microwave sickness experienced by radar operators during the second world war."
(Source: Magda Havas, PhD (Associate Professor of Environmental & Resource Studies, Trent University)
It was the first time that human guinea pigs were used to measure the effects of mobile phone radiation on children. The tests were carried out on an 11-year-old boy and a 13-year-old girl called Jennifer."
(*The child scrambler–What a mobile can do to a youngster’s brain in 2 minutes”, UK Sunday Mirror, April 1, 2004.)
You may wonder what this has to do with WiFi - well, WiFi is THREE TIMES stronger than cell phone radiation
5. People getting sick from WiFi radiation today have exactly the same things wrong with their body as the radar operators during World War 2 - when they were using the same microwave radiation to find out where the enemy planes were.
"What you need to know is that our federal guidelines are based on a thermal (heating) effect. If the radiation doesn't heat your body it is assumed to be safe. This is NOT true. We now have plenty of scientific evidence showing that we have adverse biological and health effects at levels well below the thermal guidelines.
Microwave radiation was used for the first time during the 2nd world war as radar, locating enemy aircrafts. We are now using the same frequencies to heat our food (microwave ovens), to make phone calls (cell phones and cordless phones), to listen to our babies (wireless baby monitors), to connect to the internet (WiFi and wireless routers), to submit our electricity usage (smart meters), to protect our homes (wireless monitors) . . .
There is only so much of this radiation that people can tolerate before they become sick, and people are becoming sick. The illness is called electrohypersensitivity (EHS) and is virtually identical to microwave sickness experienced by radar operators during the second world war."
(Source: Magda Havas, PhD (Associate Professor of Environmental & Resource Studies, Trent University)
------ This thread is Archived ------
What’s the difference between WiFi and WiMAX?
WiMAX is way stronger than WiFi.
WiMAX is a type of wireless Internet service. People call it “Wi-Fi on steroids” - like those bodybuilders who are so pumped up they don't even look human. WiMAX uses centrally placed masts (like cell phone towers) to transmit high-speed internet across towns and the countryside.
In order to transmit over a really large area of land, the WiMAX towers are allowed to operate at power levels way above those of WiFi masts. And the Internet receiver units, which are inside your laptop or computer, emit microwaves at up to twice the power level of Wi-Fi.
So, if we already know that WiFi is really bad for you and is making thousands of kids sick, what do you think WiMAX is going to do to us?
Many universities have already installed WiMAX across their campus - so where the heck are we going to go (when we get old enough)? At least there is one university that has banned WiFi - I guess their director has a degree in Biology so he understands the science better.
The U.K. Department of Health appears to have been wrong-footed by a member of parliament who called for an investigation into whether Wi-Fi networks pose a danger to health.
Ian Gibson, former chairman of the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, last week called for the Health Department to set up an inquiry into the potential dangers of Wi-Fi communications. He said the threat should be seriously examined and that another inquiry should be carried out like the Stewart report into mobile-phone radiation.
The government agency has been unable to confirm whether it is taking Gibson's claims seriously or whether it will launch an inquiry. Calls to the Health Department from ZDNet UK have been met with no clear response.
Gibson spoke out after two schools banned wireless networks from their premises over health fears. Of the two schools, the most notable case was a classics teacher at the prestigious Stowe School in Buckinghamshire who said he had suffered "sudden flushes, pressure behind the eyes and burning sensations," from his school's Wi-Fi network.
WiMAX is way stronger than WiFi.
WiMAX is a type of wireless Internet service. People call it “Wi-Fi on steroids” - like those bodybuilders who are so pumped up they don't even look human. WiMAX uses centrally placed masts (like cell phone towers) to transmit high-speed internet across towns and the countryside.
In order to transmit over a really large area of land, the WiMAX towers are allowed to operate at power levels way above those of WiFi masts. And the Internet receiver units, which are inside your laptop or computer, emit microwaves at up to twice the power level of Wi-Fi.
So, if we already know that WiFi is really bad for you and is making thousands of kids sick, what do you think WiMAX is going to do to us?
Many universities have already installed WiMAX across their campus - so where the heck are we going to go (when we get old enough)? At least there is one university that has banned WiFi - I guess their director has a degree in Biology so he understands the science better.
The U.K. Department of Health appears to have been wrong-footed by a member of parliament who called for an investigation into whether Wi-Fi networks pose a danger to health.
Ian Gibson, former chairman of the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, last week called for the Health Department to set up an inquiry into the potential dangers of Wi-Fi communications. He said the threat should be seriously examined and that another inquiry should be carried out like the Stewart report into mobile-phone radiation.
The government agency has been unable to confirm whether it is taking Gibson's claims seriously or whether it will launch an inquiry. Calls to the Health Department from ZDNet UK have been met with no clear response.
Gibson spoke out after two schools banned wireless networks from their premises over health fears. Of the two schools, the most notable case was a classics teacher at the prestigious Stowe School in Buckinghamshire who said he had suffered "sudden flushes, pressure behind the eyes and burning sensations," from his school's Wi-Fi network.
------ This thread is Archived ------
These reports sparked a stream of comments on ZDNet UK's news blog. Most comments on the blog dismissed the concerns as overly dramatic, though one reader claimed that lab tests had found that Wi-Fi radiation affects animals.
The Stewart Report of 2000 found no evidence that mobile-phone use caused damage to health, but it recommended a precautionary approach. Compared to mobile-phone networks, Wi-Fi networks use much less power and operate at frequencies less able to penetrate the human body, two factors that reduce the likelihood of health effects on current evidence.
"Any new technology will always be subjected to criticism as being dangerous initially. There is currently no conclusive evidence that Wi-Fi is a cause for health concerns. It seems to me quite dramatic to suddenly ban Wi-Fi," commented Carsten Sorensen, senior lecturer in information systems at the London School of Economics.
One Wi-Fi operator, The Cloud, was immediately skeptical and laughed off Gibson's concerns.
Gibson is a former dean in biological sciences at the University of East Anglia in Norwich, and he is now one of the city's two parliament members. Norwich has become the first city in the country to deploy a free public Wi-Fi network.
Is WiFi Security Easy To Crack?
…in a word YES, if you know how.
Go into any Starbucks, or similar, coffee shop on a busy day and you will notice many folks sitting down with their laptops and Netbooks using the free (usualy) WiFi.
It is truly scary to think how many of those laptops I could easily invade whilst sitting there myself, armed only with a Windows laptop and some free software available for download via the Internet.
Or, another scenario is driving through a town/city looking for businesses with wireless networks that are either unsecured or poorly secured.
Perhaps even sitting in a hotel room all day connected to the free WiFi and slipping in and out of other folks laptops.
Wireless networks are everywhere today, even many homes now have them…. and yet I see SO MANY that can easily be hacked into and sensitive data such as passwords to online banking stolen.
I am not trying to be alarmist here, just trying to provide a wake up to the home user/small business user who are basically targets waiting to be found by cyber criminals!
Did you know anyone can learn enough skills to become a half-decent cyber criminal just by spending a day on YouTube.com ?
Don’t believe me? …just look at some of these Video titles:
# Hacking WiFi Passwords with Cowpatty…
# Vista Security Hacks…
# How to Steal WPA-PSK keys…
# Bypass Local Windows Logins with a Kernel Modifying Boot CD…
# Bypass Your Corporate or University Firewalls…
# WiFi Packet Sniffing…
# Intercepting Passwords on a Network…
# Cracking Wireless Passwords…
# How to Hack a Friends Computer…
# How to Steal Data from WiFi Connected Laptops in a Coffee Shop…
# Making Money by Infecting Internet PCs with Malware…
…and yet many security threats can be limited just by knowing a few simple steps.
The Stewart Report of 2000 found no evidence that mobile-phone use caused damage to health, but it recommended a precautionary approach. Compared to mobile-phone networks, Wi-Fi networks use much less power and operate at frequencies less able to penetrate the human body, two factors that reduce the likelihood of health effects on current evidence.
"Any new technology will always be subjected to criticism as being dangerous initially. There is currently no conclusive evidence that Wi-Fi is a cause for health concerns. It seems to me quite dramatic to suddenly ban Wi-Fi," commented Carsten Sorensen, senior lecturer in information systems at the London School of Economics.
One Wi-Fi operator, The Cloud, was immediately skeptical and laughed off Gibson's concerns.
Gibson is a former dean in biological sciences at the University of East Anglia in Norwich, and he is now one of the city's two parliament members. Norwich has become the first city in the country to deploy a free public Wi-Fi network.
Is WiFi Security Easy To Crack?
…in a word YES, if you know how.
Go into any Starbucks, or similar, coffee shop on a busy day and you will notice many folks sitting down with their laptops and Netbooks using the free (usualy) WiFi.
It is truly scary to think how many of those laptops I could easily invade whilst sitting there myself, armed only with a Windows laptop and some free software available for download via the Internet.
Or, another scenario is driving through a town/city looking for businesses with wireless networks that are either unsecured or poorly secured.
Perhaps even sitting in a hotel room all day connected to the free WiFi and slipping in and out of other folks laptops.
Wireless networks are everywhere today, even many homes now have them…. and yet I see SO MANY that can easily be hacked into and sensitive data such as passwords to online banking stolen.
I am not trying to be alarmist here, just trying to provide a wake up to the home user/small business user who are basically targets waiting to be found by cyber criminals!
Did you know anyone can learn enough skills to become a half-decent cyber criminal just by spending a day on YouTube.com ?
Don’t believe me? …just look at some of these Video titles:
# Hacking WiFi Passwords with Cowpatty…
# Vista Security Hacks…
# How to Steal WPA-PSK keys…
# Bypass Local Windows Logins with a Kernel Modifying Boot CD…
# Bypass Your Corporate or University Firewalls…
# WiFi Packet Sniffing…
# Intercepting Passwords on a Network…
# Cracking Wireless Passwords…
# How to Hack a Friends Computer…
# How to Steal Data from WiFi Connected Laptops in a Coffee Shop…
# Making Money by Infecting Internet PCs with Malware…
…and yet many security threats can be limited just by knowing a few simple steps.
------ This thread is Archived ------
This Thread is Archived
This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
« Go back to All Threads
« Go back to All Threads
More Threads
Thoughts on Daylight Savings
One more reason to vote Democrat....Arizona Supreme Court
No Burning Bodies
If Our Profiles Were Truly Honest
Iran- Israel war
Should CS charge EVERYone a fee to keep fake profiles and scammers out?
Avoided It All Winter But It Happened Anyhow
So, . . .
Say Anything Again
Keep It Going!
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
Stats for this Thread
1,074 Views
4 Comments
Created: Jan 2012
Last Viewed: Apr 6
Last Commented: Jan 2012
0 Likes
Related Forums
- Thoughts on Daylight Savings
- One more reason to vote Democrat....Arizona Supreme Court
- No Burning Bodies
- If Our Profiles Were Truly Honest
- Iran- Israel war
- Should CS charge EVERYone a fee to keep fake profiles and scammers out?
- Avoided It All Winter But It Happened Anyhow
- So, . . .
- Say Anything Again
- Keep It Going!