tomcatwarneOPOcean City, Plumouth, Devon, England UK17,106 posts
The Foreign Secretary has said it would be possible to respond to an alleged chemical attack in Syria without the unanimous backing of the UN. Amid signs the UK and US are preparing to mount missile strikes against Bashar al Assad's regime, William Hague told the BBC: "Is it possible to respond to chemical weapons without complete unity on the UN Security Council? "I would argue that yes, it is, otherwise it might be impossible to respond to such outrages, such crimes." David Cameron is facing calls to recall Parliament to discuss the crisis, with politicians in France preparing to meet "in the coming days" to decide whether to respond with force, according to the country's foreign minister Laurent Fabius. "If, in reality, the Prime Minister is now considering military options involving UK personnel then of course I would expect him to seek a recall of Parliament and to come to the House of Commons and make his case in advance of a decision being made," shadow foreign secretary Douglas Alexander said. A Downing Street spokesman said summoning MPs from their summer break had not been ruled out, but stressed Mr Cameron "reserved the ability to take action very swiftly if needed".
DedovixBig Place, Central Serbia Serbia5,492 posts
George Galloway, Britain's Respect Party for Bradford West said Israel provided terrorist groups linked with al-Qaeda with chemical weapons.
"If there's been any use of nerve gas, it's the rebels that used it...If there has been use of chemical weapons, it was Al Qaeda who used the chemical weapons", Galloway said.
"Who gave al-Qaeda the chemical weapons? Here's my theory: Israel gave them the chemical weapons", Galloway MP added.
Meanwhile, media reports had it that Qatar's Al Jazeera TV and Reuters news agency published the news of massacre in East Ghouta, Damascus "one day" before the massacre happened.
According to the reports tens of videos were uploaded before foreign-backed terrorists announced and accused the Syrian government of conducting chemical attacks on its own people. Those evidences show the terrorists massacred people, including women and children, then recorded and uploaded the scenes to deceive the world's public opinion, but they did so hurriedly and gave themselves up.
The question here is why the Syrian government and its army should have committed such a heinous mass murder using chemical weapons when the United Nations inspectors are visiting the country to investigate the use of such weapons?
The foreign-backed terrorists and mercenaries hired by certain regional Arab countries are making up those allegations against the popular government of President Bashar al Assad to invoke a foreign armed intervention in Syria the same as what they did in Libya.
Qatar's Al Jazeera TV published the news of the alleged chemical weapons attack by the Syrian army, citing unknown activists as its source.
A website funded by foreign-backed terrorists also uploaded videos of the alleged attacks and wrote that "Baath Regime used chemical weapons in East Ghouta, Damascus, Jobar, Ain Tarma, Zamalka, Western Ghouta, Muaddamiyah around 03: 30 am."
At the same time, one of the well-known pro- terrorists' Youtube account 'SHAMSNN' swiftly uploaded tens of videos between 03: 00 and 04: 00 am, 20 August. The same people behind all these scenarios accused the government of Syria and its army of carrying out chemical attacks on 21 August.
Now, even if the chemical attacks had happened at 03:30 on 20 August, it's not possible to film the scenes and upload tens of videos of these heinous crimes with the best quality pictures.
Therefore, all the evidence shows is that foreign-backed terrorists perpetrated the crimes, filmed and uploaded the scenes and went to their mouthpieces such as Al Jazeera, al-Arabiya, Sky News and Reuters to accuse the Syrian government of a massacre the terrorists did.
Another best evidence of such brutality by the terrorists, who are regularly coming close to their end of life, is that they had gathered innocent civilians including women and children into certain places, killed them by nerve gas and filmed the brutal murder scenes, then they did what they were ordered to accuse the Syrian government.
Syrian Information Minister Omran al-Zoubi highlighted certain countries' hostile stance towards his country telling the world that a media and political campaign of lies is being circulated by certain Arab and foreign media outlets including al-Jazeera, al-Arabiya, Sky News and others which are involved in the shedding of Syrian blood and supporting terrorism, with the objective of distracting the UN committee of inspectors of its mission to investigate which party to the conflict has used chemical weapons.
"The cries of terrorists and their calls for aid accompany the fact that the Armed Forces are advancing on the ground, and also accompany the fabricated campaign waged by some channels in desperate bid to imbue false morale in the armed terrorist groups," he said.
Omran al-Zoubi described the support by some Arabs and the so-called Arab League for these allegations as ridiculous, naïve and illogical.
"The foreign-backed terrorists and mercenaries hired by certain regional Arab countries are making up those allegations against the popular government of President Bashar al Assad to invoke a foreign armed intervention in Syria the same as what they did in Libya."
In whose eyes is this regime a "popular government"? He is a paternally awarded dictator, who led his country into a civil war by committing atrocities against his own citizens rather than relinquishing power. With a milestone of more than a million children as refuges in foreign lands, and as many as 3 million displaced internally, I weep for another Arab country with a lost generation.
Yes, IMO, action against this regime should not require the votes from countries like China, or Russia's Putin in the U.N.to act.
DedovixBig Place, Central Serbia Serbia5,492 posts
CasualCarol: "The foreign-backed terrorists and mercenaries hired by certain regional Arab countries are making up those allegations against the popular government of President Bashar al Assad to invoke a foreign armed intervention in Syria the same as what they did in Libya."
In whose eyes is this regime a "popular government"? He is a paternally awarded dictator, who led his country into a civil war by committing atrocities against his own citizens rather than relinquishing power. With a milestone of more than a million children as refuges in foreign lands, and as many as 3 million displaced internally, I weep for another Arab country with a lost generation.
Yes, IMO, action against this regime should not require the votes from countries like China, or Russia's Putin in the U.N.to act.
It was the terrorists that launched those chemical attacks.
A day after the chemical inspectors arrive in Syria? It's the terrorists. The FSA is practically non existent anymore. Al Nursi and a range of Al Qaeda aligned forces are the only show in town.
tomcatwarne: The Foreign Secretary has said it would be possible to respond to an alleged chemical attack in Syria without the unanimous backing of the UN. Amid signs the UK and US are preparing to mount missile strikes against Bashar al Assad's regime, William Hague told the BBC: "Is it possible to respond to chemical weapons without complete unity on the UN Security Council? "I would argue that yes, it is, otherwise it might be impossible to respond to such outrages, such crimes." David Cameron is facing calls to recall Parliament to discuss the crisis, with politicians in France preparing to meet "in the coming days" to decide whether to respond with force, according to the country's foreign minister Laurent Fabius. "If, in reality, the Prime Minister is now considering military options involving UK personnel then of course I would expect him to seek a recall of Parliament and to come to the House of Commons and make his case in advance of a decision being made," shadow foreign secretary Douglas Alexander said. A Downing Street spokesman said summoning MPs from their summer break had not been ruled out, but stressed Mr Cameron "reserved the ability to take action very swiftly if needed".Ref Yahoo news.
I do not have any sympathy with Syria if US want to attack on syrian he can go head and Pakistan will stay nutral if an attack will be made on Syria.Pakistan neuclear weapons are only going to defend Pakistan and Saudi Arabia
CasualCarol: "The foreign-backed terrorists and mercenaries hired by certain regional Arab countries are making up those allegations against the popular government of President Bashar al Assad to invoke a foreign armed intervention in Syria the same as what they did in Libya."
In whose eyes is this regime a "popular government"? He is a paternally awarded dictator, who led his country into a civil war by committing atrocities against his own citizens rather than relinquishing power. With a milestone of more than a million children as refuges in foreign lands, and as many as 3 million displaced internally, I weep for another Arab country with a lost generation.
Yes, IMO, action against this regime should not require the votes from countries like China, or Russia's Putin in the U.N.to act.
According to NATO intelligence sources on the ground, Bashar Al-Assad has the popular support.... he's the devil you know vs the Al Qaeda terrorists.
bungallow55: Pakistanis, they have their own agenda Destroy, India.
Pakistan and Indian people want peace because we were the one country distributed by Great Britan.If today we were the one country we will be be most strongest nation in the world
Jack68: Pakistan and Indian people want peace because we were the one country distributed by Great Britan.If today we were the one country we will be be most strongest nation in the world
Peace, between those 2 countries? Come on be real.
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
Amid signs the UK and US are preparing to mount missile strikes against Bashar al Assad's regime, William Hague told the BBC: "Is it possible to respond to chemical weapons without complete unity on the UN Security Council?
"I would argue that yes, it is, otherwise it might be impossible to respond to such outrages, such crimes."
David Cameron is facing calls to recall Parliament to discuss the crisis, with politicians in France preparing to meet "in the coming days" to decide whether to respond with force, according to the country's foreign minister Laurent Fabius.
"If, in reality, the Prime Minister is now considering military options involving UK personnel then of course I would expect him to seek a recall of Parliament and to come to the House of Commons and make his case in advance of a decision being made," shadow foreign secretary Douglas Alexander said.
A Downing Street spokesman said summoning MPs from their summer break had not been ruled out, but stressed Mr Cameron "reserved the ability to take action very swiftly if needed".
Ref Yahoo news.