Einstein’s theory of relativity. (65)
dateadave: Can't speak on the issue Einstein being a fraud but I did study special relativity in college.
The concept of ether was disproved in the late 19th century by the Michelson and Morely. It was one of the first thing they covered in that set of lectures because for some reason there are people who won't let go of the concept of ether.
The concept of ether was disproved in the late 19th century by the Michelson and Morely. It was one of the first thing they covered in that set of lectures because for some reason there are people who won't let go of the concept of ether.
Even Einstein later had to revise his position and accept the existence of ether. His own theories called for the twisting of space by gravity. But if there was nothing but empty space between bodies in space, there would be nothing to twist. Gravity could have no effect. The very concept of space-time requires that space be composed of something rather than nothing.
------ This thread is Archived ------
RayfromUSA: This is precisely the kind of mindless drivel that exposes supposed "theoretical physics" for the hoax it is. This isn't mathematics. It has nothing to do with mathematics. It isn't the result of calcuations. It can't be verified. It's just shamanism.
Some shamans do magic tricks, some pretend to conjur spirit, some play with snakes, some pretend to have magic glasses that allow them to read gibberish, and some scribble equations that nobody can understand on a blackboard. In every case the intention is to awe people with their supposed supernatural wisdom in order to exert undue psychological influence.
Personally I suspect that Steven Hawkings is just being used as a living marionette and that everything attributed to him is actually planned out and prepared by others.
This was true for Einstein as well but he was more of a risk because people could put him on the spot and he could be exposed in his inability to demonstrate the logic behind his claims.
Hawkings however is insulated from such situations. There could be a whole team of people and computers speaking for him. And if they sidestep an issue, the very logistics of communication make it impossible to point it out in a timely manner or seek clarification.
Hawkings is the visible wizard, but can't be put on the spot. Who knows who's really behind the curtain?
Some shamans do magic tricks, some pretend to conjur spirit, some play with snakes, some pretend to have magic glasses that allow them to read gibberish, and some scribble equations that nobody can understand on a blackboard. In every case the intention is to awe people with their supposed supernatural wisdom in order to exert undue psychological influence.
Personally I suspect that Steven Hawkings is just being used as a living marionette and that everything attributed to him is actually planned out and prepared by others.
This was true for Einstein as well but he was more of a risk because people could put him on the spot and he could be exposed in his inability to demonstrate the logic behind his claims.
Hawkings however is insulated from such situations. There could be a whole team of people and computers speaking for him. And if they sidestep an issue, the very logistics of communication make it impossible to point it out in a timely manner or seek clarification.
Hawkings is the visible wizard, but can't be put on the spot. Who knows who's really behind the curtain?
Amazing,so you are all those Theoretical Physicists rolled into one?
Have more understanding of the Field than any one of them?
Man,you really took the Cake and Icing!
Your CTs really are getting the better of you now!
------ This thread is Archived ------
RayfromUSA: This is precisely the kind of mindless drivel that exposes supposed "theoretical physics" for the hoax it is. This isn't mathematics. It has nothing to do with mathematics. It isn't the result of calcuations. It can't be verified. It's just shamanism.
Some shamans do magic tricks, some pretend to conjur spirit, some play with snakes, some pretend to have magic glasses that allow them to read gibberish, and some scribble equations that nobody can understand on a blackboard. In every case the intention is to awe people with their supposed supernatural wisdom in order to exert undue psychological influence.
Personally I suspect that Steven Hawkings is just being used as a living marionette and that everything attributed to him is actually planned out and prepared by others.
This was true for Einstein as well but he was more of a risk because people could put him on the spot and he could be exposed in his inability to demonstrate the logic behind his claims.
Hawkings however is insulated from such situations. There could be a whole team of people and computers speaking for him. And if they sidestep an issue, the very logistics of communication make it impossible to point it out in a timely manner or seek clarification.
Hawkings is the visible wizard, but can't be put on the spot. Who knows who's really behind the curtain?
Some shamans do magic tricks, some pretend to conjur spirit, some play with snakes, some pretend to have magic glasses that allow them to read gibberish, and some scribble equations that nobody can understand on a blackboard. In every case the intention is to awe people with their supposed supernatural wisdom in order to exert undue psychological influence.
Personally I suspect that Steven Hawkings is just being used as a living marionette and that everything attributed to him is actually planned out and prepared by others.
This was true for Einstein as well but he was more of a risk because people could put him on the spot and he could be exposed in his inability to demonstrate the logic behind his claims.
Hawkings however is insulated from such situations. There could be a whole team of people and computers speaking for him. And if they sidestep an issue, the very logistics of communication make it impossible to point it out in a timely manner or seek clarification.
Hawkings is the visible wizard, but can't be put on the spot. Who knows who's really behind the curtain?
so,Ray,all of Einsteins Theory of Relativity and Quantum-Physics by extension is nothing but a vast Jewish Conspiracy then?
------ This thread is Archived ------
RayfromUSA: Even Einstein later had to revise his position and accept the existence of ether. His own theories called for the twisting of space by gravity. But if there was nothing but empty space between bodies in space, there would be nothing to twist. Gravity could have no effect. The very concept of space-time requires that space be composed of something rather than nothing.
Apart from your paranoia, which you probably don't acknowledge, you have answered your own question, there is not nothing between matter in space, it is cluttered up with many dimensions including space and time all of these interact with gravity.
------ This thread is Archived ------
This Thread is Archived
This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
« Go back to All Threads
« Go back to All Threads
More Threads
makeover
What happened to CS while i was away.. (Long time)
s*xual skills
Say Anything Again
Who will be The Last Person To Post... VERSION FOUR
your favorite topic?
The Real Stormy Story
Kultur-multur
Democrats destroyed America
Unions support Democrats!
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
The concept of ether was disproved in the late 19th century by the Michelson and Morely. It was one of the first thing they covered in that set of lectures because for some reason there are people who won't let go of the concept of ether.
The most supportive, real-world and relatable piece evidence that I can think of regarding relativity is that timing on GPS satellites has to be adjusted using relativity in order for them to stay accurate.
There are many more but to list them all would take up to much time and space.
Relativity contradicts Newton's Laws of Motion but they are still valid in most situations and I wouldn't send my child to a school that didn't teach them.
Relativity has recently been contested by scientists that measured the speed of some sub-atomic particles to be greater than the speed of light.
My point is that if you are thinking of science as body of facts then you really don't understand what science is in first place.
Observation, hypothesis, testing, measurement, interpretation, Conclusion. And...repeat
Every scientific theory is just waiting to be disproved.