North Korean Could Be Next On Trump's List: Next Time NUKE 'em... (39)
SistaCallie: Trump supporters liked Trump outspokenness, his brave approach to getting things done, and his motto America First, and Make America Great Again. So whatever Trump does his supporters should be happy of his bold actions, and ONLY he can fix things as he says. Trump has war-money and blood in his eyes or in his whatever.. can't stop him now, the dude is on a roll and he's crazy as a bat out of hell
North Korea’s next in Trump’s crosshairs
Brian Dowling Saturday, April 08, 2017
TESTING RESOLVE: North Korean dictator Kim Jong-Un continues to launch ballistic missiles and could pose a nuclear threat, former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton says.
Will Donald Trump Place Nuclear Weapons In South Korea?
President Trump is reportedly weighing plans to place U.S. nukes in South Korea or assassinate North Korea’s brutal dictator Kim Jong Un in response to the rogue nation’s relentless nuclear ambitions, including a potential strike on the West Coast.
The White House National Security Council presented the options as part of an accelerated review of U.S. policy on North Korea, ahead of Trump’s ongoing meetings with Chinese President Xi Jinping, according to NBC News.
The leaked proposals could be aimed at persuading Xi into pressuring North Korea — its ally and trade partner — to face the music and come back to the table over its nuclear weapons program, former U.S. ambassador to South Korea Kathleen Stephens told the Herald.
“I would imagine Xi and the Chinese would make a strong argument for why it’s necessary to try to re-engage and perhaps probably would be prepared to say they are ready to do even more to pressure North Korea,” Stephens said.
cut to fit, sorry.
So far, Trump and Xi’s talks on North Korea have yet to materialize in a “package arrangement” to resolve the international concerns, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said yesterday.
“President Xi … shared the view that this has reached a very serious stage in terms of the advancement of North Korea’s nuclear capabilities,” Tillerson said.
“They discussed the challenges that introduces for both countries, but there’s a real commitment that we work together to see if this cannot be resolved in a peaceful way,” he said. “But in order for that to happen, North Korea’s posture has to change before there’s any basis for dialogue or discussions.”
The Pentagon has already deployed a $36 billion high-altitude missile defense system in South Korea — an upsetting move for China, which calls it a national security threat. Meanwhile, South Korea is pleading for the international community to address North Korea.
“Time is not on our side. We stand at the tipping point as North Korea is nearing the final stage of nuclear weaponization of its nuclear material,” South Korea’s Vice Foreign Minister Ahn Chong-ghee reportedly said at a conference this week.
Bostonherald.com
North Korea’s next in Trump’s crosshairs
Brian Dowling Saturday, April 08, 2017
TESTING RESOLVE: North Korean dictator Kim Jong-Un continues to launch ballistic missiles and could pose a nuclear threat, former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton says.
Will Donald Trump Place Nuclear Weapons In South Korea?
President Trump is reportedly weighing plans to place U.S. nukes in South Korea or assassinate North Korea’s brutal dictator Kim Jong Un in response to the rogue nation’s relentless nuclear ambitions, including a potential strike on the West Coast.
The White House National Security Council presented the options as part of an accelerated review of U.S. policy on North Korea, ahead of Trump’s ongoing meetings with Chinese President Xi Jinping, according to NBC News.
The leaked proposals could be aimed at persuading Xi into pressuring North Korea — its ally and trade partner — to face the music and come back to the table over its nuclear weapons program, former U.S. ambassador to South Korea Kathleen Stephens told the Herald.
“I would imagine Xi and the Chinese would make a strong argument for why it’s necessary to try to re-engage and perhaps probably would be prepared to say they are ready to do even more to pressure North Korea,” Stephens said.
cut to fit, sorry.
So far, Trump and Xi’s talks on North Korea have yet to materialize in a “package arrangement” to resolve the international concerns, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said yesterday.
“President Xi … shared the view that this has reached a very serious stage in terms of the advancement of North Korea’s nuclear capabilities,” Tillerson said.
“They discussed the challenges that introduces for both countries, but there’s a real commitment that we work together to see if this cannot be resolved in a peaceful way,” he said. “But in order for that to happen, North Korea’s posture has to change before there’s any basis for dialogue or discussions.”
The Pentagon has already deployed a $36 billion high-altitude missile defense system in South Korea — an upsetting move for China, which calls it a national security threat. Meanwhile, South Korea is pleading for the international community to address North Korea.
“Time is not on our side. We stand at the tipping point as North Korea is nearing the final stage of nuclear weaponization of its nuclear material,” South Korea’s Vice Foreign Minister Ahn Chong-ghee reportedly said at a conference this week.
Bostonherald.com
Without being an expert in war-military and the likes:
Even though Trump has not a good team to guide him on foreign policy Trump has taken a good move meeting with Xi because of trading and because of economics and Xi could be a good bridge between North Kore "issues". Hopefully agreements would be done and avoid any attacks on any one.
Which agreements have been taken in the Trump-Xi meeting?
Not much I would guess, that meeting was just a protocol to send a message that they are both willing to cooperate in their comercial-diiplomatic relationships. With China owning 1 trillion of USA Bonds and with the huge trading among USA-China, that is the path: cooperation. Yet, that might be not liked by other countries.
What is historic is that a Capitalist Eagle and a Communist Dragon have to fly along, perhaps to better ports and with their joined hegemony be able to balance the powers in the world to preserve peace the most posible.
------ This thread is Archived ------
SistaCallie: Trump has war-money and blood in his eyes or in his whatever.. can't stop him now, the dude is on a roll and he's crazy as a bat out of hell
Jesus H. Christ at this hyperbole....
SistaCallie: The White House National Security Council presented the options as part of an accelerated review of U.S. policy on North Korea, ahead of Trump’s ongoing meetings with Chinese President Xi Jinping, according to NBC News.
The leaked proposals could be aimed at persuading Xi into pressuring North Korea — its ally and trade partner — to face the music and come back to the table over its nuclear weapons program, former U.S. ambassador to South Korea Kathleen Stephens told the Herald.
Well of course they were. Its how the political game is played. Its also why, during their dinner the other night, Trump said, "Pass me the rolls....and btw, I just chunked 59 Tomahawk at Assad. Be sure to tell Fat Kimmy Boy that, wouldja"The leaked proposals could be aimed at persuading Xi into pressuring North Korea — its ally and trade partner — to face the music and come back to the table over its nuclear weapons program, former U.S. ambassador to South Korea Kathleen Stephens told the Herald.
But hey, whatever, keep doing the whole "Trumps gonna NUKE the whole world" thread title spiel.
------ This thread is Archived ------
SistaCallie: Trump supporters liked Trump outspokenness, his brave approach to getting things done, and his motto America First, and Make America Great Again. So whatever Trump does his supporters should be happy of his bold actions, and ONLY he can fix things as he says. Trump has war-money and blood in his eyes or in his whatever.. can't stop him now, the dude is on a roll and he's crazy as a bat out of hell
North Korea’s next in Trump’s crosshairs
Brian Dowling Saturday, April 08, 2017
TESTING RESOLVE: North Korean dictator Kim Jong-Un continues to launch ballistic missiles and could pose a nuclear threat, former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton says.
Will Donald Trump Place Nuclear Weapons In South Korea?
President Trump is reportedly weighing plans to place U.S.nukes in Kim jong-un ear
The leaked proposals could be aimed at persuading Xi into pressuring North Korea — its ally and trade partner — to face the music and come back to the table over its nuclear weapons program, former U.S. ambassador to South Korea Kathleen Stephens told the Herald.
“I would imagine Xi and the Chinese would make a strong argument for why it’s necessary to try to re-engage and perhaps probably would be prepared to say they are ready to do even more to pressure North Korea,” Stephens said.
“But the trade-off would be some kind of commitment on the part of the U.S. to come back into the negotiation process” or scale back military exercises in the South China Sea.
North Korea this week fired a projectile that flew about 37 miles into the East Sea. It followed ballistic missile tests in February and March, as the isolated country defies United Nations sanctions and works on a missile that could deliver a miniaturized nuclear weapon to the continental U.S.
The plans are far from new additions to the U.S. foreign policy playbook and won’t come as a surprise to the Chinese, Stephens said. Moving more weapons to the Korean peninsula has been on the table since the U.S., under President George H.W. Bush, pulled its nukes from South Korea in 1991 to persuade North Korea to let international inspectors into its nuclear plants and re-energize diplomatic talks.
“The two options have been on the long list of possible options for a long time and they have generally been found to have far too many downsides,” Stephens said.
So far, Trump and Xi’s talks on North Korea have yet to materialize in a “package arrangement” to resolve the international concerns, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said yesterday.
“President Xi … shared the view that this has reached a very serious stage in terms of the advancement of North Korea’s nuclear capabilities,” Tillerson said.
“They discussed the challenges that introduces for both countries, but there’s a real commitment that we work together to see if this cannot be resolved in a peaceful way,” he said. “But in order for that to happen, North Korea’s posture has to change before there’s any basis for dialogue or discussions.”
The Pentagon has already deployed a $36 billion high-altitude missile defense system in South Korea — an upsetting move for China, which calls it a national security threat. Meanwhile, South Korea is pleading for the international community to address North Korea.
“Time is not on our side. We stand at the tipping point as North Korea is nearing the final stage of nuclear weaponization of its nuclear material,” South Korea’s Vice Foreign Minister Ahn Chong-ghee reportedly said at a conference this week.
Bostonherald.com
you go have a good cry Sista North Korea’s next in Trump’s crosshairs
Brian Dowling Saturday, April 08, 2017
TESTING RESOLVE: North Korean dictator Kim Jong-Un continues to launch ballistic missiles and could pose a nuclear threat, former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton says.
Will Donald Trump Place Nuclear Weapons In South Korea?
President Trump is reportedly weighing plans to place U.S.nukes in Kim jong-un ear
The leaked proposals could be aimed at persuading Xi into pressuring North Korea — its ally and trade partner — to face the music and come back to the table over its nuclear weapons program, former U.S. ambassador to South Korea Kathleen Stephens told the Herald.
“I would imagine Xi and the Chinese would make a strong argument for why it’s necessary to try to re-engage and perhaps probably would be prepared to say they are ready to do even more to pressure North Korea,” Stephens said.
“But the trade-off would be some kind of commitment on the part of the U.S. to come back into the negotiation process” or scale back military exercises in the South China Sea.
North Korea this week fired a projectile that flew about 37 miles into the East Sea. It followed ballistic missile tests in February and March, as the isolated country defies United Nations sanctions and works on a missile that could deliver a miniaturized nuclear weapon to the continental U.S.
The plans are far from new additions to the U.S. foreign policy playbook and won’t come as a surprise to the Chinese, Stephens said. Moving more weapons to the Korean peninsula has been on the table since the U.S., under President George H.W. Bush, pulled its nukes from South Korea in 1991 to persuade North Korea to let international inspectors into its nuclear plants and re-energize diplomatic talks.
“The two options have been on the long list of possible options for a long time and they have generally been found to have far too many downsides,” Stephens said.
So far, Trump and Xi’s talks on North Korea have yet to materialize in a “package arrangement” to resolve the international concerns, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said yesterday.
“President Xi … shared the view that this has reached a very serious stage in terms of the advancement of North Korea’s nuclear capabilities,” Tillerson said.
“They discussed the challenges that introduces for both countries, but there’s a real commitment that we work together to see if this cannot be resolved in a peaceful way,” he said. “But in order for that to happen, North Korea’s posture has to change before there’s any basis for dialogue or discussions.”
The Pentagon has already deployed a $36 billion high-altitude missile defense system in South Korea — an upsetting move for China, which calls it a national security threat. Meanwhile, South Korea is pleading for the international community to address North Korea.
“Time is not on our side. We stand at the tipping point as North Korea is nearing the final stage of nuclear weaponization of its nuclear material,” South Korea’s Vice Foreign Minister Ahn Chong-ghee reportedly said at a conference this week.
Bostonherald.com
------ This thread is Archived ------
lifeisadream: Without being an expert in war-military and the likes:
Even though Trump has not a good team to guide him on foreign policy Trump has taken a good move meeting with Xi because of trading and because of economics and Xi could be a good bridge between North Kore "issues". Hopefully agreements would be done and avoid any attacks on any one.
Which agreements have been taken in the Trump-Xi meeting?
Not much I would guess, that meeting was just a protocol to send a message that they are both willing to cooperate in their comercial-diiplomatic relationships. With China owning 1 trillion of USA Bonds and with the huge trading among USA-China, that is the path: cooperation. Yet, that might be not liked by other countries.
What is historic is that a Capitalist Eagle and a Communist Dragon have to fly along, perhaps to better ports and with their joined hegemony be able to balance the powers in the world to preserve peace the most posible.
Even though Trump has not a good team to guide him on foreign policy Trump has taken a good move meeting with Xi because of trading and because of economics and Xi could be a good bridge between North Kore "issues". Hopefully agreements would be done and avoid any attacks on any one.
Which agreements have been taken in the Trump-Xi meeting?
Not much I would guess, that meeting was just a protocol to send a message that they are both willing to cooperate in their comercial-diiplomatic relationships. With China owning 1 trillion of USA Bonds and with the huge trading among USA-China, that is the path: cooperation. Yet, that might be not liked by other countries.
What is historic is that a Capitalist Eagle and a Communist Dragon have to fly along, perhaps to better ports and with their joined hegemony be able to balance the powers in the world to preserve peace the most posible.
Perhaps you could suggest America print another trillion like Obama did and finally settle the US debit to china.
meanwhile you'll be happy to know the American Pacific Carrier fleet is Commanded by a Lady also the same Female Commander is in command of 3rd Pacific fleet as well.
and I'm sure we will all feel more comfortable over the health of the north Korean kids with her femininity calling the shots...
The US Navy has cancelled planned port calls in Australia for the USS Carl Vinson and is instead sending the aircraft carrier toward the Korean Peninsula amid concerns about new weapons tests by North Korea, military officials said.
The US military is sending the Vinson strike group, including the carrier and two guided-missile destroyers, to operate in the Western Pacific Ocean in response to Pyongyang’s recent missile tests.
There is widespread speculation based on satellite imagery and analysis that North Korea may try to carry out another weapons test in the coming days as the country prepares for its most important national holiday — the anniversary of the birth of the country’s founder on April 15.
------ This thread is Archived ------
The Carl Vinson, aircraft carrier of the Nimitz class is near the Korean Peninsula.
The body of Osama bin Laden was buried at sea in 2011 from its deck
The body of Osama bin Laden was buried at sea in 2011 from its deck
------ This thread is Archived ------
GUZMAN1: The Carl Vinson, aircraft carrier of the Nimitz class is near the Korean Peninsula.
The body of Osama bin Laden was buried at sea in 2011 from its deck
The body of Osama bin Laden was buried at sea in 2011 from its deck
not even a buckles did a SEAL team murder Bin Laden, obama and h clinton were having you on. Not even the slightest chance they could fly out two air crews two seal teams a dog and bin ladens carcass in one black hawk, not even a buckles
------ This thread is Archived ------
lifeisadream: Without being an expert in war-military and the likes:
Even though Trump has not a good team to guide him on foreign policy Trump has taken a good move meeting with Xi because of trading and because of economics and Xi could be a good bridge between North Kore "issues". Hopefully agreements would be done and avoid any attacks on any one.
Which agreements have been taken in the Trump-Xi meeting?
Not much I would guess, that meeting was just a protocol to send a message that they are both willing to cooperate in their comercial-diiplomatic relationships. With China owning 1 trillion of USA Bonds and with the huge trading among USA-China, that is the path: cooperation. Yet, that might be not liked by other countries.
What is historic is that a Capitalist Eagle and a Communist Dragon have to fly along, perhaps to better ports and with their joined hegemony be able to balance the powers in the world to preserve peace the most posible.
Even though Trump has not a good team to guide him on foreign policy Trump has taken a good move meeting with Xi because of trading and because of economics and Xi could be a good bridge between North Kore "issues". Hopefully agreements would be done and avoid any attacks on any one.
Which agreements have been taken in the Trump-Xi meeting?
Not much I would guess, that meeting was just a protocol to send a message that they are both willing to cooperate in their comercial-diiplomatic relationships. With China owning 1 trillion of USA Bonds and with the huge trading among USA-China, that is the path: cooperation. Yet, that might be not liked by other countries.
What is historic is that a Capitalist Eagle and a Communist Dragon have to fly along, perhaps to better ports and with their joined hegemony be able to balance the powers in the world to preserve peace the most posible.
Dooming the future for 200 to 250 million Americans I expect.
------ This thread is Archived ------
robplum: Perhaps you could suggest America print another trillion like Obama did and finally settle the US debit to china.
Macroeconomics is way more than just the "circulating" money not that i am an expert in macroeconomics but do you have any idea of what the public debt does to a country's economy?
Bush got a 86% % increase of debt in comparison to Clinton.
Obama got a 35 % increase of debt in comparison to Bush.
The question: why has USA such a debt?
(which btw China is not the only big creditor)
Perhaps, you could suggest to Trump just to print 1 trillion more then and a "bit" more one to pay for the expenses of the "Southern White House".
meanwhile you'll be happy to know the American Pacific Carrier fleet is Commanded by a Lady also the same Female Commander is in command of 3rd Pacific fleet as well.
and I'm sure we will all feel more comfortable over the health of the north Korean kids with her femininity calling the shots...
I do not give a peanut who is in charge of what in the military ( I am for peace) and if your comment is to critique women's emotions, perhaps you are right you are a man and you never will give birth to a child, so you will never know what is it to nourish a life inside your own life.
The US Navy has cancelled planned port calls in Australia for the USS Carl Vinson and is instead sending the aircraft carrier toward the Korean Peninsula amid concerns about new weapons tests by North Korea, military officials said.
The US military is sending the Vinson strike group, including the carrier and two guided-missile destroyers, to operate in the Western Pacific Ocean in response to Pyongyang’s recent missile tests.
There is widespread speculation based on satellite imagery and analysis that North Korea may try to carry out another weapons test in the coming days as the country prepares for its most important national holiday — the anniversary of the birth of the country’s founder on April 15.
Testing weapons?
Isn't that what the west countries have been doing as well?
Macroeconomics is way more than just the "circulating" money not that i am an expert in macroeconomics but do you have any idea of what the public debt does to a country's economy?
Bush got a 86% % increase of debt in comparison to Clinton.
Obama got a 35 % increase of debt in comparison to Bush.
The question: why has USA such a debt?
(which btw China is not the only big creditor)
Perhaps, you could suggest to Trump just to print 1 trillion more then and a "bit" more one to pay for the expenses of the "Southern White House".
meanwhile you'll be happy to know the American Pacific Carrier fleet is Commanded by a Lady also the same Female Commander is in command of 3rd Pacific fleet as well.
and I'm sure we will all feel more comfortable over the health of the north Korean kids with her femininity calling the shots...
I do not give a peanut who is in charge of what in the military ( I am for peace) and if your comment is to critique women's emotions, perhaps you are right you are a man and you never will give birth to a child, so you will never know what is it to nourish a life inside your own life.
The US Navy has cancelled planned port calls in Australia for the USS Carl Vinson and is instead sending the aircraft carrier toward the Korean Peninsula amid concerns about new weapons tests by North Korea, military officials said.
The US military is sending the Vinson strike group, including the carrier and two guided-missile destroyers, to operate in the Western Pacific Ocean in response to Pyongyang’s recent missile tests.
There is widespread speculation based on satellite imagery and analysis that North Korea may try to carry out another weapons test in the coming days as the country prepares for its most important national holiday — the anniversary of the birth of the country’s founder on April 15.
Testing weapons?
Isn't that what the west countries have been doing as well?
------ This thread is Archived ------
BritishLondon: Dooming the future for 200 to 250 million Americans I expect.
Could you elaborate on that as to how?
------ This thread is Archived ------
USA's creditors:
Japan 1.13 Trillion
China 1.12 trillion
Japan 1.13 Trillion
China 1.12 trillion
------ This thread is Archived ------
robplum: not even a buckles did a SEAL team murder Bin Laden, obama and h clinton were having you on. Not even the slightest chance they could fly out two air crews two seal teams a dog and bin ladens carcass in one black hawk, not even a buckles
I realize Aussies have their own language but could you please translate "Buckles" for us English speaking people?
------ This thread is Archived ------
------ This thread is Archived ------
ooby_dooby: I realize Aussies have their own language but could you please translate "Buckles" for us English speaking people?
I thought that I was the only one who did not understand that phrase------ This thread is Archived ------
lifeisadream: USA's creditors:
Japan 1.13 Trillion
China 1.12 trillion
Japan 1.13 Trillion
China 1.12 trillion
Actually the national debt isn't such a bad thing, Life, I do hope you read the link...as you always insist on the "facts"...
------ This thread is Archived ------
Don Dong-er
------ This thread is Archived ------
KremaP: Actually the national debt isn't such a bad thing, Life, I do hope you read the link...as you always insist on the "facts"...
Where have I said that debt is a bad thing?
which btw China owns around only 6 % of the total.
Question to you Krema:
Why do you think (believe, know perhaps...) that USA has to go along with China?
Because they love commies?
btw has anyone seen Comrad, Crayola....
------ This thread is Archived ------
lifeisadream: Where have I said that debt is a bad thing?
which btw China owns around only 6 % of the total.
Question to you Krema:
Why do you think (believe, know perhaps...) that USA has to go along with China?
Because they love commies?
btw has anyone seen Comrad, Crayola....
which btw China owns around only 6 % of the total.
Question to you Krema:
Why do you think (believe, know perhaps...) that USA has to go along with China?
Because they love commies?
btw has anyone seen Comrad, Crayola....
Well, your previous post give the exact impression of that...
Why USA has to go along with China?
I think no one can afford to go against China, let's put it that way!
------ This thread is Archived ------
SistaCallie: Trump supporters liked Trump outspokenness, his brave approach to getting things done, and his motto America First, and Make America Great Again. So whatever Trump does his supporters should be happy of his bold actions, and ONLY he can fix things as he says. Trump has war-money and blood in his eyes or in his whatever.. can't stop him now, the dude is on a roll and he's crazy as a bat out of hell
North Korea’s next in Trump’s crosshairs
Brian Dowling Saturday, April 08, 2017
TESTING RESOLVE: North Korean dictator Kim Jong-Un continues to launch ballistic missiles and could pose a nuclear threat, former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton says.
Will Donald Trump Place Nuclear Weapons In South Korea?
President Trump is reportedly weighing plans to place U.S. nukes in South Korea or assassinate North Korea’s brutal dictator Kim Jong Un in response to the rogue nation’s relentless nuclear ambitions, including a potential strike on the West Coast.
The White House National Security Council presented the options as part of an accelerated review of U.S. policy on North Korea, ahead of Trump’s ongoing meetings with Chinese President Xi Jinping, according to NBC News.
The leaked proposals could be aimed at persuading Xi into pressuring North Korea — its ally and trade partner — to face the music and come back to the table over its nuclear weapons program, former U.S. ambassador to South Korea Kathleen Stephens told the Herald.
“I would imagine Xi and the Chinese would make a strong argument for why it’s necessary to try to re-engage and perhaps probably would be prepared to say they are ready to do even more to pressure North Korea,” Stephens said.
“But the trade-off would be some kind of commitment on the part of the U.S. to come back into the negotiation process” or scale back military exercises in the South China Sea.
North Korea this week fired a projectile that flew about 37 miles into the East Sea. It followed ballistic missile tests in February and March, as the isolated country defies United Nations sanctions and works on a missile that could deliver a miniaturized nuclear weapon to the continental U.S.
The plans are far from new additions to the U.S. foreign policy playbook and won’t come as a surprise to the Chinese, Stephens said. Moving more weapons to the Korean peninsula has been on the table since the U.S., under President George H.W. Bush, pulled its nukes from South Korea in 1991 to persuade North Korea to let international inspectors into its nuclear plants and re-energize diplomatic talks.
“The two options have been on the long list of possible options for a long time and they have generally been found to have far too many downsides,” Stephens said.
So far, Trump and Xi’s talks on North Korea have yet to materialize in a “package arrangement” to resolve the international concerns, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said yesterday.
“President Xi … shared the view that this has reached a very serious stage in terms of the advancement of North Korea’s nuclear capabilities,” Tillerson said.
“They discussed the challenges that introduces for both countries, but there’s a real commitment that we work together to see if this cannot be resolved in a peaceful way,” he said. “But in order for that to happen, North Korea’s posture has to change before there’s any basis for dialogue or discussions.”
The Pentagon has already deployed a $36 billion high-altitude missile defense system in South Korea — an upsetting move for China, which calls it a national security threat. Meanwhile, South Korea is pleading for the international community to address North Korea.
“Time is not on our side. We stand at the tipping point as North Korea is nearing the final stage of nuclear weaponization of its nuclear material,” South Korea’s Vice Foreign Minister Ahn Chong-ghee reportedly said at a conference this week.
Bostonherald.com
North Korea’s next in Trump’s crosshairs
Brian Dowling Saturday, April 08, 2017
TESTING RESOLVE: North Korean dictator Kim Jong-Un continues to launch ballistic missiles and could pose a nuclear threat, former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton says.
Will Donald Trump Place Nuclear Weapons In South Korea?
President Trump is reportedly weighing plans to place U.S. nukes in South Korea or assassinate North Korea’s brutal dictator Kim Jong Un in response to the rogue nation’s relentless nuclear ambitions, including a potential strike on the West Coast.
The White House National Security Council presented the options as part of an accelerated review of U.S. policy on North Korea, ahead of Trump’s ongoing meetings with Chinese President Xi Jinping, according to NBC News.
The leaked proposals could be aimed at persuading Xi into pressuring North Korea — its ally and trade partner — to face the music and come back to the table over its nuclear weapons program, former U.S. ambassador to South Korea Kathleen Stephens told the Herald.
“I would imagine Xi and the Chinese would make a strong argument for why it’s necessary to try to re-engage and perhaps probably would be prepared to say they are ready to do even more to pressure North Korea,” Stephens said.
“But the trade-off would be some kind of commitment on the part of the U.S. to come back into the negotiation process” or scale back military exercises in the South China Sea.
North Korea this week fired a projectile that flew about 37 miles into the East Sea. It followed ballistic missile tests in February and March, as the isolated country defies United Nations sanctions and works on a missile that could deliver a miniaturized nuclear weapon to the continental U.S.
The plans are far from new additions to the U.S. foreign policy playbook and won’t come as a surprise to the Chinese, Stephens said. Moving more weapons to the Korean peninsula has been on the table since the U.S., under President George H.W. Bush, pulled its nukes from South Korea in 1991 to persuade North Korea to let international inspectors into its nuclear plants and re-energize diplomatic talks.
“The two options have been on the long list of possible options for a long time and they have generally been found to have far too many downsides,” Stephens said.
So far, Trump and Xi’s talks on North Korea have yet to materialize in a “package arrangement” to resolve the international concerns, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said yesterday.
“President Xi … shared the view that this has reached a very serious stage in terms of the advancement of North Korea’s nuclear capabilities,” Tillerson said.
“They discussed the challenges that introduces for both countries, but there’s a real commitment that we work together to see if this cannot be resolved in a peaceful way,” he said. “But in order for that to happen, North Korea’s posture has to change before there’s any basis for dialogue or discussions.”
The Pentagon has already deployed a $36 billion high-altitude missile defense system in South Korea — an upsetting move for China, which calls it a national security threat. Meanwhile, South Korea is pleading for the international community to address North Korea.
“Time is not on our side. We stand at the tipping point as North Korea is nearing the final stage of nuclear weaponization of its nuclear material,” South Korea’s Vice Foreign Minister Ahn Chong-ghee reportedly said at a conference this week.
Bostonherald.com
------ This thread is Archived ------
SistaCallie: Trump supporters liked Trump outspokenness, his brave approach to getting things done, and his motto America First, and Make America Great Again. So whatever Trump does his supporters should be happy of his bold actions, and ONLY he can fix things as he says. Trump has war-money and blood in his eyes or in his whatever.. can't stop him now, the dude is on a roll and he's crazy as a bat out of hell
North Korea’s next in Trump’s crosshairs
Brian Dowling Saturday, April 08, 2017
North Korean dictator Kim Jong-Un continues to launch ballistic missiles and could pose a nuclear threat, former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton says.
Will Donald Trump Place Nuclear Weapons In South Korea?
President Trump is reportedly weighing plans to place U.S. nukes in South Korea or assassinate North Korea’s brutal dictator Kim Jong Un in response to the rogue nation’s relentless nuclear ambitions, including a potential strike on the West Coast.
The White House National Security Council presented the options as part of an accelerated review of U.S. policy on North Korea, ahead of Trump’s ongoing meetings with Chinese President Xi Jinping, according to NBC News.
The leaked proposals could be aimed at persuading Xi into pressuring North Korea — its ally and trade partner — to face the music and come back to the table over its nuclear weapons program, former U.S. ambassador to South Korea Kathleen Stephens told the Herald.
“I would imagine Xi and the Chinese would make a strong argument for why it’s necessary to try to re-engage and perhaps probably would be prepared to say they are ready to do even more to pressure North Korea,” Stephens said.
“But the trade-off would be some kind of commitment on the part of the U.S. to come back into the negotiation process” or scale back military exercises in the South China Sea.
North Korea this week fired a projectile that flew about 37 miles into the East Sea. It followed ballistic missile tests in February and March, as the isolated country defies United Nations sanctions and works on a missile that could deliver a miniaturized nuclear weapon to the continental U.S.
The plans are far from new additions to the U.S. foreign policy playbook and won’t come as a surprise to the Chinese, Stephens said. Moving more weapons to the Korean peninsula has been on the table since the U.S., under President George H.W. Bush, pulled its nukes from South Korea in 1991 to persuade North Korea to let international inspectors into its nuclear plants and re-energize diplomatic talks.
“The two options have been on the long list of possible options for a long time and they have generally been found to have far too many downsides,” Stephens said.
So far, Trump and Xi’s talks on North Korea have yet to materialize in a “package arrangement” to resolve the international concerns, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said yesterday.
“President Xi … shared the view that this has reached a very serious stage in terms of the advancement of North Korea’s nuclear capabilities,” Tillerson said.
“They discussed the challenges that introduces for both countries, but there’s a real commitment that we work together to see if this cannot be resolved in a peaceful way,” he said. “But in order for that to happen, North Korea’s posture has to change before there’s any basis for dialogue or discussions.”
The Pentagon has already deployed a $36 billion high-altitude missile defense system in South Korea — an upsetting move for China, which calls it a national security threat. Meanwhile, South Korea is pleading for the international community to address North Korea.
“Time is not on our side. We stand at the tipping point as North Korea is nearing the final stage of nuclear weaponization of its nuclear material,” South Korea’s Vice Foreign Minister Ahn Chong-ghee reportedly said at a conference this week.
Bostonherald.com
North Korea’s next in Trump’s crosshairs
Brian Dowling Saturday, April 08, 2017
North Korean dictator Kim Jong-Un continues to launch ballistic missiles and could pose a nuclear threat, former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton says.
Will Donald Trump Place Nuclear Weapons In South Korea?
President Trump is reportedly weighing plans to place U.S. nukes in South Korea or assassinate North Korea’s brutal dictator Kim Jong Un in response to the rogue nation’s relentless nuclear ambitions, including a potential strike on the West Coast.
The White House National Security Council presented the options as part of an accelerated review of U.S. policy on North Korea, ahead of Trump’s ongoing meetings with Chinese President Xi Jinping, according to NBC News.
The leaked proposals could be aimed at persuading Xi into pressuring North Korea — its ally and trade partner — to face the music and come back to the table over its nuclear weapons program, former U.S. ambassador to South Korea Kathleen Stephens told the Herald.
“I would imagine Xi and the Chinese would make a strong argument for why it’s necessary to try to re-engage and perhaps probably would be prepared to say they are ready to do even more to pressure North Korea,” Stephens said.
“But the trade-off would be some kind of commitment on the part of the U.S. to come back into the negotiation process” or scale back military exercises in the South China Sea.
North Korea this week fired a projectile that flew about 37 miles into the East Sea. It followed ballistic missile tests in February and March, as the isolated country defies United Nations sanctions and works on a missile that could deliver a miniaturized nuclear weapon to the continental U.S.
The plans are far from new additions to the U.S. foreign policy playbook and won’t come as a surprise to the Chinese, Stephens said. Moving more weapons to the Korean peninsula has been on the table since the U.S., under President George H.W. Bush, pulled its nukes from South Korea in 1991 to persuade North Korea to let international inspectors into its nuclear plants and re-energize diplomatic talks.
“The two options have been on the long list of possible options for a long time and they have generally been found to have far too many downsides,” Stephens said.
So far, Trump and Xi’s talks on North Korea have yet to materialize in a “package arrangement” to resolve the international concerns, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said yesterday.
“President Xi … shared the view that this has reached a very serious stage in terms of the advancement of North Korea’s nuclear capabilities,” Tillerson said.
“They discussed the challenges that introduces for both countries, but there’s a real commitment that we work together to see if this cannot be resolved in a peaceful way,” he said. “But in order for that to happen, North Korea’s posture has to change before there’s any basis for dialogue or discussions.”
The Pentagon has already deployed a $36 billion high-altitude missile defense system in South Korea — an upsetting move for China, which calls it a national security threat. Meanwhile, South Korea is pleading for the international community to address North Korea.
“Time is not on our side. We stand at the tipping point as North Korea is nearing the final stage of nuclear weaponization of its nuclear material,” South Korea’s Vice Foreign Minister Ahn Chong-ghee reportedly said at a conference this week.
Bostonherald.com
yeah,lets nuke the living BeJesus out of them!
------ This thread is Archived ------
This Thread is Archived
This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
« Go back to All Threads
« Go back to All Threads
More Threads
Kultur-multur
Why is this shameful?
Ladies
who shaped your life?
Unions support Democrats!
Trump on Trial
your favorite topic?
Are the ads on here as phony as some of the profiles?
The Real Stormy Story
Trump Elementary
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
Stats for this Thread
1,589 Views
38 Comments
Created: Apr 2017
Last Viewed: Apr 15
Last Commented: Apr 2017
0 Likes
North Korea’s next in Trump’s crosshairs
Brian Dowling Saturday, April 08, 2017
TESTING RESOLVE: North Korean dictator Kim Jong-Un continues to launch ballistic missiles and could pose a nuclear threat, former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton says.
Will Donald Trump Place Nuclear Weapons In South Korea?
President Trump is reportedly weighing plans to place U.S. nukes in South Korea or assassinate North Korea’s brutal dictator Kim Jong Un in response to the rogue nation’s relentless nuclear ambitions, including a potential strike on the West Coast.
The White House National Security Council presented the options as part of an accelerated review of U.S. policy on North Korea, ahead of Trump’s ongoing meetings with Chinese President Xi Jinping, according to NBC News.
The leaked proposals could be aimed at persuading Xi into pressuring North Korea — its ally and trade partner — to face the music and come back to the table over its nuclear weapons program, former U.S. ambassador to South Korea Kathleen Stephens told the Herald.
“I would imagine Xi and the Chinese would make a strong argument for why it’s necessary to try to re-engage and perhaps probably would be prepared to say they are ready to do even more to pressure North Korea,” Stephens said.
“But the trade-off would be some kind of commitment on the part of the U.S. to come back into the negotiation process” or scale back military exercises in the South China Sea.
North Korea this week fired a projectile that flew about 37 miles into the East Sea. It followed ballistic missile tests in February and March, as the isolated country defies United Nations sanctions and works on a missile that could deliver a miniaturized nuclear weapon to the continental U.S.
The plans are far from new additions to the U.S. foreign policy playbook and won’t come as a surprise to the Chinese, Stephens said. Moving more weapons to the Korean peninsula has been on the table since the U.S., under President George H.W. Bush, pulled its nukes from South Korea in 1991 to persuade North Korea to let international inspectors into its nuclear plants and re-energize diplomatic talks.
“The two options have been on the long list of possible options for a long time and they have generally been found to have far too many downsides,” Stephens said.
So far, Trump and Xi’s talks on North Korea have yet to materialize in a “package arrangement” to resolve the international concerns, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said yesterday.
“President Xi … shared the view that this has reached a very serious stage in terms of the advancement of North Korea’s nuclear capabilities,” Tillerson said.
“They discussed the challenges that introduces for both countries, but there’s a real commitment that we work together to see if this cannot be resolved in a peaceful way,” he said. “But in order for that to happen, North Korea’s posture has to change before there’s any basis for dialogue or discussions.”
The Pentagon has already deployed a $36 billion high-altitude missile defense system in South Korea — an upsetting move for China, which calls it a national security threat. Meanwhile, South Korea is pleading for the international community to address North Korea.
“Time is not on our side. We stand at the tipping point as North Korea is nearing the final stage of nuclear weaponization of its nuclear material,” South Korea’s Vice Foreign Minister Ahn Chong-ghee reportedly said at a conference this week.
Bostonherald.com