Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to
report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
There is actual information available for the cuts, spending, deregulation, healthcare, and more.
I agree with most of them. Especially the apprenticeship instead of tax payer funded education with no guidelines. Many of the spending cuts are just. Why is the federal government involved with certain things globally on our tax dollars in the first place? Some of those cuts shouldn't have had the federal government involved at all from the beginning.
Even the false hood of catering to the rich. Where do the jobs come from, often with healthcare and other incentives for people to work? How does an economy even begin to thrive if not enough people are working, spending, and investing? That's what those corporations, companies, and businesses do as they take on more employees and offer benefits as incentives as they are able too; investments.
Where does the government get it's money from? How does that happen if there aren't any people able to offer jobs, start businesses, grow, develop, and expand? We need that with in the country since it doesn't do much good to have products dumped from out side of it. How long before people are no longer able to buy the products? Then what? We become like some of the other collapsed countries and worse down the road?
Education, healthcare, and other subsidies should actually be on the states. They were there for decades before the federal government began to heavily usurp control and authority. The feds continued to expand, tax, regulate, and even fine to the mess we have now. All for votes since they can't seem to use any logic or common sense. The states were doing a better job on their own originally. The system was meant to be there as supplemental in case of need, not career moves. Yes, it had limitations for a reason.
Other things around the globe and locally? Many smoke screens while real perpetrators continue to have their tracks covered and worse still, ignored.
The foreign policies so far aren't the best but better than obozo by miles. I think Trump has made it clear the days of hand outs and turning the other cheek to offer the cheeks of the U.S. citizens are pretty much over.
Frankly, I'm at the point where I no longer care if war were to hit. Get it done and over with if that's what's in the future. I doubt many would be touting the "Geneva convention" rules and such. The U.N. isn't going to act. They should have started to do so under obozo but I doubt he had any intentions of quelling things since he was too centered on bringing the country down to new lows while fueling other things to new highs.
We're still in the watch and see stages while politics continue to be played out at tax payer expense. All of the evidence in the world for some people that they ignore and won't act on. Digging like rabid dogs looking for bones with little to nothing against others.