The girls can wear trousers while the boys can wear culottes or kilts.
A primary school in New Zealand has abolished gendered school uniforms to avoid stereotyping, following in the footsteps of dozens of British schools.
The move comes after some girls at Dunedin North Intermediate School in the South Island complained about having to wear “archaic” kilts, headteacher Heidi Hayward said.
The school, which has around 200 pupils aged 10-13, began allowing female pupils to wear trousers in 2016.
But this created further problems when the small number of girls who chose to wear trousers were teased for dressing “like boys”, staff said. In response, the school created five “gender neutral” options, including shorts, long pants, culottes, a kilt and long trousers, with pupils free to choose any of the options, regardless of their gender.
Ms Hayward told the Otago Daily Times that the initiative aimed to remove gender stereotypes.
We don't say there's a girls' uniform and a boys' uniform," she said. "There's five options for the uniform, and as long as you wear them in their entirety, you can wear whichever uniform you please.
``Last year I had a couple of kids who challenged me. They said: `Why do we have to wear kilts? You can wear pants. Why can't we?' That seemed pretty logical to me. It was 2016 and I thought it was odd that we still have these stereotypes. What we were hoping to avoid is making it hard.
``If you're a girl who doesn't want to wear a skirt, you should have an option that works for you. That's where the culottes come in,'' she said, adding that none of the boys so far have opted for the kilt.
She said pupils have been accepting of the options, but parents had taken longer to warm to the initiative.
``The kids weren't really fussed about it. It's adults that have taken a while to get their heads around it - they've asked lots of questions.''
sophiasummer: The girls can wear trousers while the boys can wear culottes or kilts.
A primary school in New Zealand has abolished gendered school uniforms to avoid stereotyping, following in the footsteps of dozens of British schools.
The move comes after some girls at Dunedin North Intermediate School in the South Island complained about having to wear “archaic” kilts, headteacher Heidi Hayward said.
The school, which has around 200 pupils aged 10-13, began allowing female pupils to wear trousers in 2016.
But this created further problems when the small number of girls who chose to wear trousers were teased for dressing “like boys”, staff said. In response, the school created five “gender neutral” options, including shorts, long pants, culottes, a kilt and long trousers, with pupils free to choose any of the options, regardless of their gender.
Ms Hayward told the Otago Daily Times that the initiative aimed to remove gender stereotypes.
We don't say there's a girls' uniform and a boys' uniform," she said. "There's five options for the uniform, and as long as you wear them in their entirety, you can wear whichever uniform you please.
``Last year I had a couple of kids who challenged me. They said: `Why do we have to wear kilts? You can wear pants. Why can't we?' That seemed pretty logical to me. It was 2016 and I thought it was odd that we still have these stereotypes. What we were hoping to avoid is making it hard.
``If you're a girl who doesn't want to wear a skirt, you should have an option that works for you. That's where the culottes come in,'' she said, adding that none of the boys so far have opted for the kilt.
She said pupils have been accepting of the options, but parents had taken longer to warm to the initiative.
``The kids weren't really fussed about it. It's adults that have taken a while to get their heads around it - they've asked lots of questions.''
Lonely road:
It's nice that NZ is catching up with with the rest of the civilised world.
I think it is a good idea to use non gender-specific uniforms.
Although if I had the choice I would ban all uniforms anyway. Most of them are horrible. We had to wear one. Most schools do. But at least here now, most can wear trousers as well as skirts.
mollybaby: Don't worry Soph, It's not going to happen
I think it is a good idea to use non gender-specific uniforms.
Although if I had the choice I would ban all uniforms anyway. Most of them are horrible. We had to wear one. Most schools do. But at least here now, most can wear trousers as well as skirts.
I absolutely think its a very well thought out idea.
Uniforms were mandatory in my schools to maintain equality of appearance. Why does this type of political correctness have to lean to gender specific boys/men's usual attire without having boys wear skirts? Makes no sense to me todo this without skirts on boys and call it gender neutrality or non stereotyping. Doesn't really matter to me but Why do they need to do this?
galrads: Uniforms were mandatory in my schools to maintain equality of appearance. Why does this type of political correctness have to lean to gender specific boys/men's usual attire without having boys wear skirts? Makes no sense to me todo this without skirts on boys and call it gender neutrality or non stereotyping. Doesn't really matter to me but Why do they need to do this?
I guess just giving everybody the choice to wear what they want.
The reasoning for uniforms here too is also supposedly to maintain equality of appearance. But it only does it very superficially. People will still show their riches in their hairstyle, shoes, other adornments even if the basic uniform is the same.
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
A primary school in New Zealand has abolished gendered school uniforms to avoid stereotyping, following in the footsteps of dozens of British schools.
The move comes after some girls at Dunedin North Intermediate School in the South Island complained about having to wear “archaic” kilts, headteacher Heidi Hayward said.
The school, which has around 200 pupils aged 10-13, began allowing female pupils to wear trousers in 2016.
But this created further problems when the small number of girls who chose to wear trousers were teased for dressing “like boys”, staff said. In response, the school created five “gender neutral” options, including shorts, long pants, culottes, a kilt and long trousers, with pupils free to choose any of the options, regardless of their gender.
Ms Hayward told the Otago Daily Times that the initiative aimed to remove gender stereotypes.
We don't say there's a girls' uniform and a boys' uniform," she said. "There's five options for the uniform, and as long as you wear them in their entirety, you can wear whichever uniform you please.
``Last year I had a couple of kids who challenged me. They said: `Why do we have to wear kilts? You can wear pants. Why can't we?' That seemed pretty logical to me. It was 2016 and I thought it was odd that we still have these stereotypes. What we were hoping to avoid is making it hard.
``If you're a girl who doesn't want to wear a skirt, you should have an option that works for you. That's where the culottes come in,'' she said, adding that none of the boys so far have opted for the kilt.
She said pupils have been accepting of the options, but parents had taken longer to warm to the initiative.
``The kids weren't really fussed about it. It's adults that have taken a while to get their heads around it - they've asked lots of questions.''
Lonely road: