constructive criticism ( Archived) (36)

Nov 13, 2017 11:01 AM CST constructive criticism
constructive criticism is good
------ This thread is Archived ------
Nov 13, 2017 11:27 AM CST constructive criticism
Dedovix
DedovixDedovixBig Place, Central Serbia Serbia12 Threads 1 Polls 5,492 Posts
pedro27: constructive criticism is good


it is???uh oh
------ This thread is Archived ------
Nov 13, 2017 11:34 AM CST constructive criticism
Dedovix: it is???



if your doing something wrong constructive criticism is the same as ''good advise'' to correct it
------ This thread is Archived ------
Nov 13, 2017 11:40 AM CST constructive criticism
pedro27: if your doing something wrong constructive criticism is the same as ''good advise'' to correct it
can i piss on your corn flacks????????grin
------ This thread is Archived ------
Nov 13, 2017 11:41 AM CST constructive criticism
truheart1941: can i piss on your corn flacks????????



boil your head first??????????????
------ This thread is Archived ------
Nov 13, 2017 11:47 AM CST constructive criticism
Dedovix
DedovixDedovixBig Place, Central Serbia Serbia12 Threads 1 Polls 5,492 Posts
pedro27: if your doing something wrong constructive criticism is the same as ''good advise'' to correct it


who`s to judge uh oh
------ This thread is Archived ------
Nov 13, 2017 11:50 AM CST constructive criticism
Ccincy
CcincyCcincyCincinnati, Ohio USA77 Threads 20,535 Posts
Constructive criticism is used in a positive yes it's good.

If it done in a negative way to tear others down then no it's not good.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Nov 13, 2017 11:58 AM CST constructive criticism
Dedovix: who`s to judge



the one giving the advise
------ This thread is Archived ------
Nov 13, 2017 11:59 AM CST constructive criticism
Ccincy: Constructive criticism is used in a positive yes it's good.

If it done in a negative way to tear others down then no it's not good.




google is your friend
------ This thread is Archived ------
Nov 13, 2017 12:11 PM CST constructive criticism
Ccincy
CcincyCcincyCincinnati, Ohio USA77 Threads 20,535 Posts
pedro27: google is your friend


pedro I rarely us google cause I can think for myself.grin
------ This thread is Archived ------
Nov 13, 2017 12:15 PM CST constructive criticism
Ccincy: pedro I rarely us google cause I can think for myself.
noting to do with thinking, google is more for studying and learning
------ This thread is Archived ------
Nov 13, 2017 12:21 PM CST constructive criticism
Ccincy
CcincyCcincyCincinnati, Ohio USA77 Threads 20,535 Posts
pedro27: noting to do with thinking, google is more for studying and learning



I haven't really learned all that much from it.

I learned from hands on experiencing life.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Nov 13, 2017 12:34 PM CST constructive criticism
Ccincy: I haven't really learned all that much from it.

I learned from hands on experiencing life.



well google is the best thing since sliced bread IMO
------ This thread is Archived ------
Nov 13, 2017 12:39 PM CST constructive criticism
Ccincy
CcincyCcincyCincinnati, Ohio USA77 Threads 20,535 Posts
pedro27: well google is the best thing since sliced bread IMO



pedro obviously you have a right to your opinion.thumbs up

Different strokes for different folks.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Nov 13, 2017 12:42 PM CST constructive criticism
Ccincy: pedro obviously you have a right to your opinion.

Different strokes for different folks.




google is the boss, great technology 2017thumbs up
------ This thread is Archived ------
Nov 13, 2017 12:45 PM CST constructive criticism
MikeD12
MikeD12MikeD12Broadstairs, Kent, England UK16 Threads 2 Polls 2,809 Posts
pedro27: noting to do with thinking, google is more for studying and learning

Cuonstructive information
Wikipedia information is not accepted for the compulsory Bibliography in an HND, a University degree,
a Masters or a PhD Thesis unless the information is backed up by an "acredited recognised" source.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Nov 13, 2017 12:50 PM CST constructive criticism
MikeD12: Cuonstructive information
Wikipedia information is not accepted for the compulsory Bibliography in an HND, a University degree,
a Masters or a PhD Thesis unless the information is backed up by an "acredited recognised" source.



I was talking about ''GOOGLE''
------ This thread is Archived ------
Nov 13, 2017 1:07 PM CST constructive criticism
MikeD12
MikeD12MikeD12Broadstairs, Kent, England UK16 Threads 2 Polls 2,809 Posts
pedro27: I was talking about ''GOOGLE''


Yes & as Google is used to access Wikipedia in almost 80% of students cases, the same rule I quoted applies.
Googelis NOT king - When I did my two we were warned to use actual BOOKS and not to rely on the internet.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Nov 13, 2017 1:37 PM CST constructive criticism
jac_the_gripper
jac_the_gripperjac_the_gripperTonyrefail, South Glamorgan, Wales UK24 Threads 5,363 Posts
And research papers have more credibility than books at those levels of education.

I found there's a lot of papers in pdf format which can be found with a little googling and don't involve paying subscription fees to journals.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Nov 13, 2017 1:53 PM CST constructive criticism
Lookin4missright
Lookin4missrightLookin4missrightmelbourne, Victoria Australia400 Threads 24,032 Posts
pedro27: boil your head first??????????????




laugh
------ This thread is Archived ------
Post Comment - Post a comment on this Forum Thread

This Thread is Archived

This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.

« Go back to All Threads
Message #318

Stats for this Thread

1,603 Views
35 Comments
Created: Nov 2017
Last Viewed: Apr 10
Last Commented: Nov 2017

Share this Thread

We use cookies to ensure that you have the best experience possible on our website. Read Our Privacy Policy Here