Should there be a license to use the internet? (194)
I'm only here for the yummy protein shakes..Take that away from me I have nothing.
------ This thread is Archived ------
rizlared: Looking at some of the recent threads, it crossed my mind that maybe time has come to not exactly censure the internet, I am against that. But maybe users should be required to pass a test to ensure they fully understand both the good and bad use of this medium.
A provisional license could be issued that allows access to most sites, but restricts access to sites where there isa cross section of public users, such as facebook, twitter, CS etc. Basically any form of social media where real interaction can take place.
To gain a full license the user needs to demonstrate an ability not to take everything at face value, they understand that people have different opinions, they understand that because someone disagrees on one point, it does not mean they automatically support the opposite argument.
Maybe there could be different levels of license, based on activity and tolerance?
The license holder would be downgraded if shown to spread hatred, lies or blatant false news.
Just wondering what other would think of such a policy.
It's suggestive bias view what individual consider " hatred" as some people hates the truth because it's opposite from what they want or don't want to see. You see how many different size fingers you have. Should they all be exacly the same? Perhaps our fingers are not politicly correct for being different as people are? A provisional license could be issued that allows access to most sites, but restricts access to sites where there isa cross section of public users, such as facebook, twitter, CS etc. Basically any form of social media where real interaction can take place.
To gain a full license the user needs to demonstrate an ability not to take everything at face value, they understand that people have different opinions, they understand that because someone disagrees on one point, it does not mean they automatically support the opposite argument.
Maybe there could be different levels of license, based on activity and tolerance?
The license holder would be downgraded if shown to spread hatred, lies or blatant false news.
Just wondering what other would think of such a policy.
------ This thread is Archived ------
rizlared: Looking at some of the recent threads, it crossed my mind that maybe time has come to not exactly censure the internet, I am against that. But maybe users should be required to pass a test to ensure they fully understand both the good and bad use of this medium.
A provisional license could be issued that allows access to most sites, but restricts access to sites where there isa cross section of public users, such as facebook, twitter, CS etc. Basically any form of social media where real interaction can take place.
To gain a full license the user needs to demonstrate an ability not to take everything at face value, they understand that people have different opinions, they understand that because someone disagrees on one point, it does not mean they automatically support the opposite argument.
Maybe there could be different levels of license, based on activity and tolerance?
The license holder would be downgraded if shown to spread hatred, lies or blatant false news.
Just wondering what other would think of such a policy.
A licence for common sense Riz?A provisional license could be issued that allows access to most sites, but restricts access to sites where there isa cross section of public users, such as facebook, twitter, CS etc. Basically any form of social media where real interaction can take place.
To gain a full license the user needs to demonstrate an ability not to take everything at face value, they understand that people have different opinions, they understand that because someone disagrees on one point, it does not mean they automatically support the opposite argument.
Maybe there could be different levels of license, based on activity and tolerance?
The license holder would be downgraded if shown to spread hatred, lies or blatant false news.
Just wondering what other would think of such a policy.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Wouldn't make a difference, there are lots of people who get their drivers license who has absolutely no business being behind the wheel.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Track16: Wouldn't make a difference, there are lots of people who get their drivers license who has absolutely no business being behind the wheel.
Can't disagree with that, especially in developing countries like China, where it was very easy to get a driving license, but today the laws have been tightened, and any provisional driver has to pass a series of tests, all with rigid ID inspections, sadly the actual tests are simple and easy to pass, but a move in the right direction.------ This thread is Archived ------
Track16: Wouldn't make a difference, there are lots of people who get their drivers license who has absolutely no business being behind the wheel.
That's why I walk every where ------ This thread is Archived ------
rainbowdream2017: It's suggestive bias view what individual consider " hatred" as some people hates the truth because it's opposite from what they want or don't want to see. You see how many different size fingers you have. Should they all be exacly the same? Perhaps our fingers are not politicly correct for being different as people are?
Of course, but for anyone with any intelligence can tell the difference between a driving passion and outright hatred, the only one who fails to see it are the perpetrators themselves.------ This thread is Archived ------
Rachie14: A licence for common sense Riz?
Sad there is no way to separate the stupid from those with even half a brain, like people who cannot tell the difference between socialism and communism
------ This thread is Archived ------
I see it like this under the current climate, that anything you say. Can be twisted, manipulated and used against you.
That is just my thoughts on people that have so much hatered for others. Especially in the virtual world. They forget that they leave a digital footprint.
I very much doubt these people would express their views in such a way if they were held accountable.
That is just my thoughts on people that have so much hatered for others. Especially in the virtual world. They forget that they leave a digital footprint.
I very much doubt these people would express their views in such a way if they were held accountable.
------ This thread is Archived ------
rizlared: Sad there is no way to separate the stupid from those with even half a brain, like people who cannot tell the difference between socialism and communism
the sad truth!------ This thread is Archived ------
------ This thread is Archived ------
rizlared: Sad there is no way to separate the stupid from those with even half a brain, like people who cannot tell the difference between socialism and communism
------ This thread is Archived ------
rizlared: Of course, but for anyone with any intelligence can tell the difference between a driving passion and outright hatred, the only one who fails to see it are the perpetrators themselves.
------ This thread is Archived ------
So rainbowdream, you have shown that you can use google images, very impressive, shame you still fail to understand that using someone who supports communism in its total state, is not exactly a good example!
For your education:-
Communism is a political system greatly influenced by socialism but differs in the way the people are controlled, whereas socialism is primarily an economic system that exists in various forms under a wide range of political/social systems and existed eons before communism came into the political arena.
In no way would a socialist aspire to become a communist, any more than a Conservative would aspire to become a fascist.
Hope this helps.
For your education:-
Communism is a political system greatly influenced by socialism but differs in the way the people are controlled, whereas socialism is primarily an economic system that exists in various forms under a wide range of political/social systems and existed eons before communism came into the political arena.
In no way would a socialist aspire to become a communist, any more than a Conservative would aspire to become a fascist.
Hope this helps.
------ This thread is Archived ------
rizlared: So rainbowdream, you have shown that you can use google images, very impressive, shame you still fail to understand that using someone who supports communism in its total state, is not exactly a good example!
For your education:-
Communism is a political system greatly influenced by socialism but differs in the way the people are controlled, whereas socialism is primarily an economic system that exists in various forms under a wide range of political/social systems and existed eons before communism came into the political arena.
In no way would a socialist aspire to become a communist, any more than a Conservative would aspire to become a fascist.
Hope this helps.
For your education:-
Communism is a political system greatly influenced by socialism but differs in the way the people are controlled, whereas socialism is primarily an economic system that exists in various forms under a wide range of political/social systems and existed eons before communism came into the political arena.
In no way would a socialist aspire to become a communist, any more than a Conservative would aspire to become a fascist.
Hope this helps.
------ This thread is Archived ------
rizlared: Looking at some of the recent threads, it crossed my mind that maybe time has come to not exactly censure the internet, I am against that. But maybe users should be required to pass a test to ensure they fully understand both the good and bad use of this medium.
A provisional license could be issued that allows access to most sites, but restricts access to sites where there isa cross section of public users, such as facebook, twitter, CS etc. Basically any form of social media where real interaction can take place.
To gain a full license the user needs to demonstrate an ability not to take everything at face value, they understand that people have different opinions, they understand that because someone disagrees on one point, it does not mean they automatically support the opposite argument.
Maybe there could be different levels of license, based on activity and tolerance?
The license holder would be downgraded if shown to spread hatred, lies or blatant false news.
Just wondering what other would think of such a policy.
Sounds like an Interesting idea ,but for some reason,I think that many of us would become awesome hackers and bypass any obstacle ...A provisional license could be issued that allows access to most sites, but restricts access to sites where there isa cross section of public users, such as facebook, twitter, CS etc. Basically any form of social media where real interaction can take place.
To gain a full license the user needs to demonstrate an ability not to take everything at face value, they understand that people have different opinions, they understand that because someone disagrees on one point, it does not mean they automatically support the opposite argument.
Maybe there could be different levels of license, based on activity and tolerance?
The license holder would be downgraded if shown to spread hatred, lies or blatant false news.
Just wondering what other would think of such a policy.
------ This thread is Archived ------
rizlared: So rainbowdream, you have shown that you can use google images, very impressive, shame you still fail to understand that using someone who supports communism in its total state, is not exactly a good example!
For your education:-
Communism is a political system greatly influenced by socialism but differs in the way the people are controlled, whereas socialism is primarily an economic system that exists in various forms under a wide range of political/social systems and existed eons before communism came into the political arena.
In no way would a socialist aspire to become a communist, any more than a Conservative would aspire to become a fascist.
Hope this helps.
For your education:-
Communism is a political system greatly influenced by socialism but differs in the way the people are controlled, whereas socialism is primarily an economic system that exists in various forms under a wide range of political/social systems and existed eons before communism came into the political arena.
In no way would a socialist aspire to become a communist, any more than a Conservative would aspire to become a fascist.
Hope this helps.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Limun: Sounds like an Interesting idea ,but for some reason,I think that many of us would become awesome hackers and bypass any obstacle ...
Yeah they could, but to be fair if you need to go to that extreme. It already proves the original point.------ This thread is Archived ------
rizlared: So rainbowdream, you have shown that you can use google images, very impressive, shame you still fail to understand that using someone who supports communism in its total state, is not exactly a good example!
For your education:-
Communism is a political system greatly influenced by socialism but differs in the way the people are controlled, whereas socialism is primarily an economic system that exists in various forms under a wide range of political/social systems and existed eons before communism came into the political arena.
In no way would a socialist aspire to become a communist, any more than a Conservative would aspire to become a fascist.
Hope this helps.
Should there be a license to use the internet? Should there be a license to exercise Free speech, Free Media ? Hmmm For your education:-
Communism is a political system greatly influenced by socialism but differs in the way the people are controlled, whereas socialism is primarily an economic system that exists in various forms under a wide range of political/social systems and existed eons before communism came into the political arena.
In no way would a socialist aspire to become a communist, any more than a Conservative would aspire to become a fascist.
Hope this helps.
------ This thread is Archived ------
This Thread is Archived
This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
« Go back to All Threads
« Go back to All Threads
More Threads
See It All The Time
Are the ads on here as phony as some of the profiles?
Trump on Trial
This is a thread that might become a poll..about charging everyone for membership but read!!!
beauty of the heart
One week of the most outrageous GOP leadership!
One more reason to vote Democrat....Arizona Supreme Court
biggest lie
The Real Stormy Story
Gal / sdarlagg passed away on April 10, 2024
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
Stats for this Thread
8,930 Views
193 Comments
in CS Lounge
Created: Jun 2018
Last Viewed: 6 hrs ago
Last Commented: Jun 2018
198 Likes
Last Liked: Jun 2018
160 DisAgrees
Last DisAgreed: Jun 2018
Related Forums
- See It All The Time
- Are the ads on here as phony as some of the profiles?
- Trump on Trial
- This is a thread that might become a poll..about charging everyone for membership but read!!!
- beauty of the heart
- One week of the most outrageous GOP leadership!
- One more reason to vote Democrat....Arizona Supreme Court
- biggest lie
- The Real Stormy Story
- Gal / sdarlagg passed away on April 10, 2024
A provisional license could be issued that allows access to most sites, but restricts access to sites where there isa cross section of public users, such as facebook, twitter, CS etc. Basically any form of social media where real interaction can take place.
To gain a full license the user needs to demonstrate an ability not to take everything at face value, they understand that people have different opinions, they understand that because someone disagrees on one point, it does not mean they automatically support the opposite argument.
Maybe there could be different levels of license, based on activity and tolerance?
The license holder would be downgraded if shown to spread hatred, lies or blatant false news.
Just wondering what other would think of such a policy.