lindsyjones: There was a good feature that was deleted and it is to ban poster who responds very nasty on the post or create ad hominem comments.
No more so we just have to depend on the mods to have the post deleted as they deem necessary.
The mods deleted YOUR posts, so no wonder you miss being able to ban posters, here's a thought, why was it only Trump supporters that banned those opposing their views? Maybe because the truth hurts? Maybe because it seems the only way a Trump supporter can refute a post is to attack the poster and not the message? You and your cohorts can call me and others who dislike Trump, all the names under the sun, all it does is show you cannot dispute the posts.
rizlared: The mods deleted YOUR posts, so no wonder you miss being able to ban posters, here's a thought, why was it only Trump supporters that banned those opposing their views? Maybe because the truth hurts? Maybe because it seems the only way a Trump supporter can refute a post is to attack the poster and not the message? You and your cohorts can call me and others who dislike Trump, all the names under the sun, all it does is show you cannot dispute the posts.
Excuse me? You sound as though my posts were the only ones that were removed? They have removed so many of your posts on my thread way back.
Now that is being said, I have never seen anyone who attacks more posters than you. You seldom ever contribute on the substance of the original post, you almost always attack the poster. Ad hominem.
lindsyjones: As a long time member of this site, I want to acknowledge my gratefulness for this site.
Not only do they give us members the chance to meet our significant others (two great loves in my case) but that they allow us to have a very respectful and interesting discussions about almost anything else.
I would like to invite everyone and share me in thanking the owners, moderators and anyone involved in providing us this free site.
Thank you again moderators for having a good control and your fast response to cut incessant insults from some posters when needed. I have been involved many a times and I have learned that in order for all of us to learn we must remain decent and positive on all of our posts to foster a good relationship.
Of course, we will have a lot of disagreements on almost everything and why not, we are all different, but agreeing to disagree is the mood that the owners promote.
I have learned and I am trying to be good to everyone, including those that disagree with me and don't like me.
Thank you all.
Of course, when posters were nasty, including me, I would rather that they were banned on my own thread.
lindsyjones: Excuse me? You sound as though my posts were the only ones that were removed? They have removed so many of your posts on my thread way back.
Now that is being said, I have never seen anyone who attacks more posters than you. You seldom ever contribute on the substance of the original post, you almost always attack the poster. Ad hominem.
Now Ray grow up will you?
Incorrect, I was referring to your deleted posts, I never mentioned the others that were deleted as they had nothing to do with my comment.
I always refute the message, usually with evidence, The only time I say anything against the poster is AFTER they have attacked me and not my post. But then selective reading is a great pastime for Trumpettes!
rizlared: Incorrect, I was referring to your deleted posts, I never mentioned the others that were deleted as they had nothing to do with my comment.
I always refute the message, usually with evidence, The only time I say anything against the poster is AFTER they have attacked me and not my post. But then selective reading is a great pastime for Trumpettes!
Okay Ray. Thanks for your time. Your comments no matter how disagreeable sometimes are like what you said, they are your opinions and why would anyone change that. I am beginning to understand that this thread and or blog topics are just piss in the wind. Most of them. No significant effect other than to bs sometimes.
lindsyjones: There was a good feature that was deleted and it is to ban poster who responds very nasty on the post or create ad hominem comments.
No more so we just have to depend on the mods to have the post deleted as they deem necessary.
Isn't that half the problem today.~ ..
Some one saying. - ... ' You don't have control, others will decide what is wrong" ~ I get it. to a Moral stance. but online where i'd rather not feed/get fed anything.~ i'd like to have my own say about, What I read
Its part of the whole "deal" being on a free site. . Free site.. Free. .. .... Free is such a controversial word . Nothing is really free.. even things 'Given' to you, are still Not free.
InstincThis: Isn't that half the problem today.~ ..
Some one saying. - ... ' You don't have control, others will decide what is wrong" ~ I get it. to a Moral stance. but online where i'd rather not feed/get fed anything.~ i'd like to have my own say about, What I read
Its part of the whole "deal" being on a free site. . Free site.. Free. .. .... Free is such a controversial word . Nothing is really free.. even things 'Given' to you, are still Not free.
btw GOOD morning
yes Ins if you think about it, the free services that we get here is paid for by the advertisers and it makes a win win situation.
On you tube or google, they have their secured advertisements to get the compensation. Pretty much like in the old days of reading the paper. I think that's how these bozos the likes of Soros and Murdoch made their thrillions, they charge us to read the paper and then make money, even more for the advertisers to expose their business.
lindsyjones: yes Ins if you think about it, the free services that we get here is paid for by the advertisers and it makes a win win situation. On you tube or google, they have their secured advertisements to get the compensation. Pretty much like in the old days of reading the paper. I think that's how these bozos the likes of Soros and Murdoch made their thrillions, they charge us to read the paper and then make money, even more for the advertisers to expose their business. I am cool.
Heck yea its a win win!! They don't require you to X them or , watch a clip.. Its really actually decent. (Ads being decent online. You read that right)
Hahah, we don't gotta keep up with the times. The paper is a privilege.. Who ever took hold of that idea, really did make a Great investment. Kinda like the whole idea of Phone books.. just a way to reach out and relate. even those have ads :P
InstincThis: Heck yea its a win win!! They don't require you to X them or , watch a clip.. Its really actually decent. (Ads being decent online. You read that right)
Hahah, we don't gotta keep up with the times. The paper is a privilege.. Who ever took hold of that idea, really did make a Great investment. Kinda like the whole idea of Phone books.. just a way to reach out and relate. even those have ads :P
Ye Ye you're cool
Think of Soros and Murdoch, now it makes sense. Imagine their trillions of dollars stashed somewhere.
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
No more so we just have to depend on the mods to have the post deleted as they deem necessary.
Maybe because it seems the only way a Trump supporter can refute a post is to attack the poster and not the message?
You and your cohorts can call me and others who dislike Trump, all the names under the sun, all it does is show you cannot dispute the posts.