Do you think the mods were too hasty .. (140)
aries1234plymout, Devon, England UK175 Threads 3 Polls 5,672 PostsThe banning rule was a good thing when used sensibly, i didn't know you could have two profiles although many clever people seem to.
------ This thread is Archived ------
serene56: Really
This Gemini needs further information
I don't see two accounts anywhere..This Gemini needs further information
------ This thread is Archived ------
Me either but I enjoyed this bit 
Section 14. Member Disputes.
You are solely responsible for your interactions with other ConnectingSingles.com Members. ConnectingSingles.com reserves the right, but has no obligation, to monitor disputes between you and other Members.
Power to the people
lol
Section 14. Member Disputes.
You are solely responsible for your interactions with other ConnectingSingles.com Members. ConnectingSingles.com reserves the right, but has no obligation, to monitor disputes between you and other Members.
Power to the people
lol------ This thread is Archived ------
serene56: Me either but I enjoyed this bit
Section 14. Member Disputes.
You are solely responsible for your interactions with other ConnectingSingles.com Members. ConnectingSingles.com reserves the right, but has no obligation, to monitor disputes between you and other Members.
Power to the people lol
Oh, I missed that one too Section 14. Member Disputes.
You are solely responsible for your interactions with other ConnectingSingles.com Members. ConnectingSingles.com reserves the right, but has no obligation, to monitor disputes between you and other Members.
Power to the people lol
------ This thread is Archived ------
unlaoised: Oh, I missed that one too
I don't mind a good stoush 
It's a jungle in here
------ This thread is Archived ------
serene56: I don't mind a good stoush
It's a jungle in here
Me either, when it's called for.It's a jungle in here
I'd be more inclined to go with "zoo". Wild animals are preferable
------ This thread is Archived ------
One2note: In removing the banning option from a thread .
I'm all for freedom of speech , but has caused some negativity, as far as giving trolls the opportunity to sabotage blogs & vent their frustrations ?
"Freedom of Speech" does not apply here. If it's your thread, you can and should remove trolls before they totally hijack your thread and insult everyone else. Freedom of Speech gives trolls the right to make their own threads.I'm all for freedom of speech , but has caused some negativity, as far as giving trolls the opportunity to sabotage blogs & vent their frustrations ?
But CS can override the trolls, because it's CS's website. The trolls are free to make their own websites.
------ This thread is Archived ------
kornbluth: "Freedom of Speech" does not apply here. If it's your thread, you can and should remove trolls before they totally hijack your thread and insult everyone else. Freedom of Speech gives trolls the right to make their own threads.
But CS can override the trolls, because it's CS's website. The trolls are free to make their own websites.
It's a case of damned if I do , or damned if I don't .But CS can override the trolls, because it's CS's website. The trolls are free to make their own websites.
------ This thread is Archived ------
One2note: In removing the banning option from a thread .
I'm all for freedom of speech , but has caused some negativity, as far as giving trolls the opportunity to sabotage blogs & vent their frustrations ?
Did you mean tasty instead of hasty...I'm all for freedom of speech , but has caused some negativity, as far as giving trolls the opportunity to sabotage blogs & vent their frustrations ?
------ This thread is Archived ------
One2note: It's a case of damned if I do , or damned if I don't .
Not really. If I send a screed to Times of London and demand front-page placement, and don't get it, is Times denying my freedom of speech? Now or 50 years ago?------ This thread is Archived ------
I wonder if those of you who were against the banning of posters from their threads , are having second thought ????
------ This thread is Archived ------
It was a mistake to bring in the banning option in the first place.
It was created in response to one person who would wreak havoc on the forums, creating new profiles which often mimicked regular posters' profiles. This was some 7/8 years ago.
By the time it was brought in with a site revamp, the individual concerned appeared to have been disappeared. There were rumours of the site taking legal action.
I only ever saw the ban function misused, either because an opinion wasn't liked by the thread author, or in the early days, for teasing fun.
Jeeepers, for those of you who remember that great man, banned me from one of his threads half a dozen times just so I'd privately mail him and give him some jip.
It was created in response to one person who would wreak havoc on the forums, creating new profiles which often mimicked regular posters' profiles. This was some 7/8 years ago.
By the time it was brought in with a site revamp, the individual concerned appeared to have been disappeared. There were rumours of the site taking legal action.
I only ever saw the ban function misused, either because an opinion wasn't liked by the thread author, or in the early days, for teasing fun.
Jeeepers, for those of you who remember that great man, banned me from one of his threads half a dozen times just so I'd privately mail him and give him some jip.
------ This thread is Archived ------
jac_the_gripper: It was a mistake to bring in the banning option in the first place.
It was created in response to one person who would wreak havoc on the forums, creating new profiles which often mimicked regular posters' profiles. This was some 7/8 years ago.
By the time it was brought in with a site revamp, the individual concerned appeared to have been disappeared. There were rumours of the site taking legal action.
I only ever saw the ban function misused, either because an opinion wasn't liked by the thread author, or in the early days, for teasing fun.
Jeeepers, for those of you who remember that great man, banned me from one of his threads half a dozen times just so I'd privately mail him and give him some jip.
I agree with you Jac.It was created in response to one person who would wreak havoc on the forums, creating new profiles which often mimicked regular posters' profiles. This was some 7/8 years ago.
By the time it was brought in with a site revamp, the individual concerned appeared to have been disappeared. There were rumours of the site taking legal action.
I only ever saw the ban function misused, either because an opinion wasn't liked by the thread author, or in the early days, for teasing fun.
Jeeepers, for those of you who remember that great man, banned me from one of his threads half a dozen times just so I'd privately mail him and give him some jip.
The ban button was misused.
------ This thread is Archived ------
KB 
Especially misused by that minx, Jeeepers!
Golly that man used to make us laugh, eh? I can remember how much my belly used to hurt even now.
Especially misused by that minx, Jeeepers!
Golly that man used to make us laugh, eh? I can remember how much my belly used to hurt even now.
------ This thread is Archived ------
jac_the_gripper: KB
Especially misused by that minx, Jeeepers!
Golly that man used to make us laugh, eh? I can remember how much my belly used to hurt even now.
My Jac. Especially misused by that minx, Jeeepers!
Golly that man used to make us laugh, eh? I can remember how much my belly used to hurt even now.
Jeeepers was one in a million. Such a good soul.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Kaybee50: My Jac.
Jeeepers was one in a million. Such a good soul.
A sad loss also.Jeeepers was one in a million. Such a good soul.
------ This thread is Archived ------
I miss the banning option...it livened the place up at least.
------ This thread is Archived ------
She was a bloody bully and those who spoke up weren't in a bloody gang they refused to be bloody bullied.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Mercedes_00: She was a bloody bully and those who spoke up weren't in a bloody gang they refused to be bloody bullied.
I do think arguements with people should be done on a one to one basis though mer.She was awful to people I agree
------ This thread is Archived ------
bodleing2: A sad loss also.
He was one of the good'uns for sure. ------ This thread is Archived ------
This Thread is Archived
This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
« Go back to All Threads
« Go back to All Threads
More Threads
Trump on Trial
The GOP Representatives owned by Vladimir Putin
s*xual skills
beauty of the heart
biggest lie
makeover
Why is this shameful?
Are the ads on here as phony as some of the profiles?
Who will be The Last Person To Post... VERSION FOUR
Iran- Israel war
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).