He was given a clean bill of health the other 6 times before too. I still think the whole "blasey" thing might have been the plan if Romney would have won in 2012. Kavanaugh was on his list as a SCOTUS pick too.
Apparently, some one remembered the plan AND the stooge to start it with.
Draegoneer: He was given a clean bill of health the other 6 times before too. I still think the whole "blasey" thing might have been the plan if Romney would have won in 2012. Kavanaugh was on his list as a SCOTUS pick too.
Apparently, some one remembered the plan AND the stooge to start it with.
What sort of country is it you have to be found not guilty six times
aries1234: What sort of country is it you have to be found not guilty six times
A country that doesn't condemn a man as guilty when there's a reasonable doubt. Suspicion of the fact that he probably did this or something else similar is not grounds for a guilty verdict. You have to find them not guilty which is of course not quite the same thing as finding them innocent.
ChesneyChrist: A country that doesn't condemn a man as guilty when there's a reasonable doubt. Suspicion of the fact that he probably did this or something else similar is not grounds for a guilty verdict. You have to find them not guilty which is of course not quite the same thing as finding them innocent.
The courts are an elite system of experts at the end of the day which flies in the face of popular opinion and what probably happened. If there's any doubt at all you have to submit to that doubt, that's what the training and knowledge is for and it is rather ironic that Trumpster populism which would hang a man on 51% certainty is now the voice of reasonable doubt. Of course they're only pretending, no smoke without fire is who they are normally however they will try exceptionally hard to see the good in someone when it's expedient. Their usual would be to hang you on a 51% chance of guilt unless they have a vested interest in your being found not guilty.
What it's not is actual justice. Actual justice would not be confident about the guilt or innocence of this man, the more certain you are the less just you are.
ChesneyChrist: A country that doesn't condemn a man as guilty when there's a reasonable doubt. Suspicion of the fact that he probably did this or something else similar is not grounds for a guilty verdict. You have to find them not guilty which is of course not quite the same thing as finding them innocent.
ChesneyChrist: A country that doesn't condemn a man as guilty when there's a reasonable doubt. Suspicion of the fact that he probably did this or something else similar is not grounds for a guilty verdict. You have to find them not guilty which is of course not quite the same thing as finding them innocent.
yes, no corroborating evidence is the current play. unfortunately it's come down to "he says/she says". Either Mark Judge is a coward or she is lying?
I doubt she is lying, but there needs to be more evidence. TBH I did not like his behavior in the hearings and think his "dis" temperment should disqualify him as SCOTUS - babywhiner
On the contrary, the U.S. legal system is supposed to presume innocence UNTIL/UNLESS PROVEN guilty.
They tried to make Kavanaugh guilty with no evidence. We should just take every one at their word and destroy other people's lives with no evidence or truth.
No, I don't think blasey was accurate in her accusation. The "friends" she implicated, couldn't even help her with her story. I don't think Kavanaugh was guilty of any thing. Seven FBI investigations now and he is clean.
It's good to see he has a back bone. It wasn't just about him. The Dems didn't care about his family or even blasey for that matter.
I hope the hear good news on the radio tomorrow by the time I get out of work. Kavanaugh sitting on the SCOTUS.
Draegoneer: On the contrary, the U.S. legal system is supposed to presume innocence UNTIL/UNLESS PROVEN guilty.
They tried to make Kavanaugh guilty with no evidence. We should just take every one at their word and destroy other people's lives with no evidence or truth.
No, I don't think blasey was accurate in her accusation. The "friends" she implicated, couldn't even help her with her story. I don't think Kavanaugh was guilty of any thing. Seven FBI investigations now and he is clean.
It's good to see he has a back bone. It wasn't just about him. The Dems didn't care about his family or even blasey for that matter.
I hope the hear good news on the radio tomorrow by the time I get out of work. Kavanaugh sitting on the SCOTUS.
Then why do you not apply the same rules to Obama and the Clintons, either they are also innocent of many accusations with no actual evidence or your legal system is biased to one particular political party?
rizlared: Then why do you not apply the same rules to Obama and the Clintons, either they are also innocent of many accusations with no actual evidence or your legal system is biased to one particular political party?
Because they were guilty. They were in charge with power. No one was there for the country or people. Yet they are still allowed to be humored with their diversionary tactics by the party in control now. As you can see, no collusion, no proof of wrong doing by a nominated judge, yet they still get to use the law accordingly.
Our legal system did nothing when they should have and now it's being abused by the same people with nothing but accusations to hide their own criminality. It is coming out though. I'm interested in those transcripts yet to be released from the very people that helped obozo and cronies skate.
So you have a biased justice system, that only Republicans are innocent until PROVEN guilty.
Just because YOU think Obama and the Clintons are guilty does not make it factual. No court of law in the USA has even attempted to convict them, let alone find them Guilty.
Therefore, by your own definition, Obama and the Clintons are innocent of any accusations and suppositions. Thank you
Hillary Clinton’s crime sheet reads like that of an old mafia boss only with the added element of war crimes.
Here is a list of the top five reasons she should be behind bar.
.. .The War on Libya
30a484d800000578-3419982-image-a-28_1453931815706
Hillary Clinton bears more responsibility for the ill-fated war on Libya than anyone else.
Even Barack Obama has admitted it was a colossal mistake.
The war has turned Libya into a prosperous state where terrorists were jailed into a failed state where competing groups of Islamic terrorists run the show.
The war did not have authorisation by the United Nations
America Might Not Deserve Trump, But Dems and Hillary Deserved To Lose Benghazi
1benghazi
Not content with destroying Libya as a nation,
Hillary Clinton’s woeful and questionably premeditated lack of security at the US diplomatic compound in Benghazi,
one of the most violent cities not just in Libya but the world, must be investigated more seriously.
The family of the murdered Chris Stevens blame Hillary Clinton for criminal negligence.
I believe it is something more. It is analogues to when former British Prime Minister William Gladstone failed to
relieve the besieged General Gordon in Khartoum leading to his death. This is a contemporary equivalent only far more sinister.
Burning Bernie Sanders
Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt. listens as Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton speaks during a rally in Portsmouth, N.H., Tuesday, July 12, 2016, where Sanders endorsed Clinton for president. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)
Vladimir Putin has not meddled in the US election, Hillary Clinton has.
Leaked emails reveal that the popular socialist Bernie Sanders had his chance of becoming president stolen
from him by Hillary Clinton and her associates at the Democratic National Committee.
If defrauding democracy is worth going to war over, certainly it is worth going to jail over.
Millions of Americans had their votes stolen. Imagine how much more civilised an election
it would be if a traditional conservative like Trump were running against a traditional socialist like Sanders?
fbi-clinton-email fraud
Hillary Clinton’s use of private servers to send classified state secrets is inexcusable.
Hillary Clinton abused her power as Secretary of State, running America’s foreign policy like a mafia state.
If something like this were done in Africa or Latin America, the US Congress would be up in arms.
The fact that the case has been re-opened shows that perhaps justice may be done at last, whether for the right reasons or otherwise.
Funding Islamic Terrorism Donald Trump was mocked when he said that Obama and Hillary were the founders of ISIS.
Anyone who knows how the world works saw a clear connection between American ambitions to illegally
overthrow the legitimate government of Syria and the funnelling of money through Saudi Arabia and Qatar to ISIS,
Al Qaeda and others of the same ideology. Julian Assange has vindicated Donald Trump and if the world has any sense of justice left,
Hillary must be held responsible for unleashing the hell that is ISIS and their compatriots.
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).