Jihadi bride Shamima Begum has been granted legal aid to fight the decision to remove her citizenship, the Mail can reveal today +6
Jihadi bride Shamima Begum has been granted legal aid to fight the decision to remove her citizenship, the Mail can reveal today
Jihadi bride Shamima Begum has been granted legal aid to fight the decision to remove her citizenship, the Mail can reveal today.
In a decision blasted as ‘disgusting’ and ‘ridiculous’ by MPs, lawyers have successfully asked for taxpayers’ cash on her behalf, arguing that Home Secretary Sajid Javid’s decision was unfair on the 19-year-old Islamic State acolyte.
It means taxpayers face a legal bill which could run into hundreds of thousands of pounds to fund the former London schoolgirl’s fight to come back to the UK. She is currently in a refugee camp in Syria.
Last night there was fury at the decision by the Legal Aid Agency (LAA), which emerged on the day it was alleged that Begum had stitched suicide bombers into explosive vests. It was also claimed she carried a Kalashnikov rifle and served in a senior role in the IS’s ‘morality police’ as an enforcer of its laws.
The British-born schoolgirl left her family in East London to join IS the age of 15 in February 2015. She lived in the Syrian city of Raqqa and married a Dutch jihadi named Yago Riedijk with whom she had three children, all of whom died as infants.
After being missing for four years, the teenager resurfaced at a refugee camp earlier this year saying she wanted to come home and pleading to be allowed back.
In a dramatic move, Mr Javid ordered that she be stripped of her citizenship ‘in order to protect this country’.
However, the Mail has now learnt that British taxpayers will help pay for her court battle to return, even though Begum has not applied for legal aid herself, nor formally instructed lawyers.
Why should we pay her legal bills she left England for Isis of her own free will, andwas involved with Isis.
The principle is, if she is entitled to legal aid, she should have it. It isn't a matter of what she deserves, it's a matter of the law. You can't just move the legal goal posts about according to whether you like someone or not.
Harbal: The principle is, if she is entitled to legal aid, she should have it. It isn't a matter of what she deserves, it's a matter of the law. You can't just move the legal goal posts about according to whether you like someone or not.
Politicians move those goal posts here all the time and get away with it: look at any democrats actions in office here. Its clear they do not like the usa constitution so they disregard it amongst themselves. Democrats are haters too. I wish they would recruit hater shawn hannity.
galrads: I wish the wise elders in the uk would grow some balls and make it whole and popular again. The younger generation in england are the biggest slackers this world has ever seen in modern times. They must be cursed and their little do nothing want everything handed to them fairy wings havent matured yet. Beware the day of Nimue in London.
Same here, then add 90 percent of our black population, who are the same way, and if they don't get their way, they burn down their own freakin neighborhoods.. They ignore police, when told to keep their hands where they can be seen, then wonder why they got shot.. Then their families sue, and win.. It's a damn circle jerk around here..
she isn't a british citizen anymore since she got stripped of her citizenship......so I agree that she shouldn't be represented....she should go to wherever her dutch husband is....she chose isis and she chose her husband and there are consequences for those choices....one of them being that she shouldn't have representation from a country she is no longer a citizen of.....the time for legal aid would have been when they were trying to decide if they would allow her back or not....then she would have been entitled to representation as she was still a citizen.....
M4_Mischief: she isn't a british citizen anymore since she got stripped of her citizenship......so I agree that she shouldn't be represented....she should go to wherever her dutch husband is....she chose isis and she chose her husband and there are consequences for those choices....one of them being that she shouldn't have representation from a country she is no longer a citizen of.....the time for legal aid would have been when they were trying to decide if they would allow her back or not....then she would have been entitled to representation as she was still a citizen.....
.............this is ..some of the b/s..we have to put. Up with. In this. Country.......money spent on her..should be better used being spent on children's hospitals.....our government. Are weak willed. And gutless........jmo.
mikey4691: Same here, then add 90 percent of our black population, who are the same way, and if they don't get their way, they burn down their own freakin neighborhoods.. They ignore police, when told to keep their hands where they can be seen, then wonder why they got shot.. Then their families sue, and win.. It's a damn circle jerk around here..
Yeah, they got here all by themselves!
...oh, wait...
They were brought here by rapists and murderers, illegally...
American's change the laws to benefit a few people, over multitudes, regularly.
American's are only in favour of democracy, after they deplete populations with murder, and genocide, so their voices and votes don't count.
If America was ever a land of laws, Native Americans, Hawaiians, and Black people would've had the vote in 1776.
But Europeans don't assimilate well into the cultures they invade.
When it comes to the ability to assimilate, they're worse than Muslims!
"Last night there was fury at the decision by the Legal Aid Agency (LAA), which emerged on the day it was alleged that Begum had stitched suicide bombers into explosive vests. It was also claimed she carried a Kalashnikov rifle and served in a senior role in the IS’s ‘morality police’ as an enforcer of its laws."
She should be left with the people who know her; and let them be her judges...
She shouldn't be allowed to escape justice, now that the side she backed in their abuses of humanity, lost.
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
+6
Jihadi bride Shamima Begum has been granted legal aid to fight the decision to remove her citizenship, the Mail can reveal today
Jihadi bride Shamima Begum has been granted legal aid to fight the decision to remove her citizenship, the Mail can reveal today.
In a decision blasted as ‘disgusting’ and ‘ridiculous’ by MPs, lawyers have successfully asked for taxpayers’ cash on her behalf, arguing that Home Secretary Sajid Javid’s decision was unfair on the 19-year-old Islamic State acolyte.
It means taxpayers face a legal bill which could run into hundreds of thousands of pounds to fund the former London schoolgirl’s fight to come back to the UK. She is currently in a refugee camp in Syria.
Last night there was fury at the decision by the Legal Aid Agency (LAA), which emerged on the day it was alleged that Begum had stitched suicide bombers into explosive vests. It was also claimed she carried a Kalashnikov rifle and served in a senior role in the IS’s ‘morality police’ as an enforcer of its laws.
The British-born schoolgirl left her family in East London to join IS the age of 15 in February 2015. She lived in the Syrian city of Raqqa and married a Dutch jihadi named Yago Riedijk with whom she had three children, all of whom died as infants.
After being missing for four years, the teenager resurfaced at a refugee camp earlier this year saying she wanted to come home and pleading to be allowed back.
In a dramatic move, Mr Javid ordered that she be stripped of her citizenship ‘in order to protect this country’.
However, the Mail has now learnt that British taxpayers will help pay for her court battle to return, even though Begum has not applied for legal aid herself, nor formally instructed lawyers.
Why should we pay her legal bills she left England for Isis of her own free will, andwas involved with Isis.