Privately owned business aside, I'd like to know who this punk thinks he is that he and his minions can decide which kind of speech is acceptable or not. Who made them arbitors of speech and ideas? Lefties are poison.
Facebook's purpose is to connect people, many use it as an outlet to vent, post offensive material and comments, keyboard warriors are always ready to pounce, people think they can get away with saying just about anything by using the freedom of speech card, it makes what is meant to be a positive experience a negative one, so yes he needs to take charge and it's about time in my opinion.
MysteriousGirl80: Facebook's purpose is to connect people, many use it as an outlet to vent, post offensive material and comments, keyboard warriors are always ready to pounce, people think they can get away with saying just about anything by using the freedom of speech card, it makes what is meant to be a positive experience a negative one, so yes he needs to take charge and it's about time in my opinion.
I agree but the question is that some people wonder how Mark Z plans what and how to weed out the negative, like where to draw the line?
you draw the line where you want it to be drawn …. if you have a facebook account you freely give your soul to Mark Z and your schedule to every one who feels like ransacking you … Don't blame Zuckerberg because you sign the contract freely … maybe you should start writing real letters again hahahaha
Zuckerberg - Since the Scumbag created FB after what he's been allowed dangerous brainwashed terrorists & trolls to go on doing & making threats on his site he should already be in jail but Like ours in the UK the US Justice system only works for the wealthy -- No further comment
vsam2424: you draw the line where you want it to be drawn …. if you have a facebook account you freely give your soul to Mark Z and your schedule to every one who feels like ransacking you … Don't blame Zuckerberg because you sign the contract freely … maybe you should start writing real letters again hahahaha
This a new rule added. If he felt so strongly about this he should've implemented this when fb was invented and made public.
I'm not smart enough to make a judgement on what Zuckerburg should have done and when he should have done it. All I know is I'm sick to death of all you f@ckers that think you have the cornered the market on truth.
FYI to everyone, just because someone else thinks differently than you does not make their thinking and opinions wrong. You twats insult people because they have a different ideology than you. Guess what? You f@cking idealogues are the problem in this world not the goddamn solution.
smiley963Johannesburg, Gauteng South Africa3,651 posts
Bandit_Geezer: I'm not smart enough to make a judgement on what Zuckerburg should have done and when he should have done it. All I know is I'm sick to death of all you f@ckers that think you have the cornered the market on truth.
FYI to everyone, just because someone else thinks differently than you does not make their thinking and opinions wrong. You twats insult people because they have a different ideology than you. Guess what? You f@cking idealogues are the problem in this world not the goddamn solution.
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
Do you think Mark Zuckerburg is violating freedom of speach?
Is it fair that he is the one to decide what is ok to post and what or whom is not appropriate and ban them.
I think there is a line that people will agree or disagree with this new rule.