Skip to main content

Records Of Prince Andrew's Location On Night Of Molestation Destroyed By Police (13)

Aug 3, 2020 3:39 PM CST Records Of Prince Andrew's Location On Night Of Molestation Destroyed By Police
MustangWriter
MustangWriterMustangWriterBoerne, Texas USA383 Threads 3 Polls 2,779 Posts
Authored by John Vibes via TheMindUnleashed.com,

According to a former member of the Royal guard who worked on Prince Andrew’s security detail, The London Metropolitan Police have destroyed evidence that could have revealed where Prince Andrew was on the night that he is accused of having sex with a teenager that was being trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.

The night in question is March 10th, 2011, as well as the morning hours of March 11. Virginia Giuffre, who was known by the name Virginia Roberts at the time, says that she was taken to London by Epstein and Maxwell and was expected to have sex with Prince Andrew.

Giuffre says that she was just 17-years-old at the time and remembers being taken to the “Tramp” nightclub in London, as well as one of Maxwell’s homes in the city.

Andrew was questioned about Giuffre’s accusations during an interview with BBC, and he made numerous mistakes and fumbles that brought his credibility into question.

In the interview, Andrew vehemently denied knowing Giuffre and insisted that he was not at that nightclub on March 10th.

He claimed that he was at a Pizza Express location in Woking, for a party, but at least one other witness has come forward to corroborate Giuffre’s claim. The witness says that she distinctly remembers seeing the prince at the nightclub on that evening.

There should be records of what the prince was doing on that evening, which would either exonerate him or prove that he was lying. Members of the royal family are regularly accompanied by police guards in their day to day activities and there are records of where and when the officers were sent, or at the very least a record of which officers worked on which day.

If these records were to be made available, the investigators could easily determine where Prince Andrew was on the night in question. Initially, police refused to release this information to the media, insisting that revealing such sensitive information about the royal family could be a “threat to national security.”

One of the guards who was assigned to work Andrew’s security detail on that night, remembers having an issue with the prince when he returned to Buckingham Palace.

He says that Andrew ended up making his return to the palace very late that night, but wanted to obtain the records to confirm that this was the same night.

A few months ago, the former guard requested to see his shift records from his time working Andrew’s security detail. He got no response for months, but was eventually contacted by a caseworker with the London Metropolitan Police.

The caseworker told him that the records were destroyed, and said that it is the agency’s policy to only keep records for two years, which is a bit of a strange policy in the computer age where files don’t take up much space.

“I am very disappointed. Why on earth did it take nearly five months to respond with such a non-informative answer? I’m also surprised to discover that any records regarding the Royal family and their police protection are destroyed, much less after just two years,” the guard told the Daily Mail.
Aug 3, 2020 3:48 PM CST Records Of Prince Andrew's Location On Night Of Molestation Destroyed By Police
"The night in question"?

frustrated Like he was only there once
Sep 10, 2020 12:43 PM CST Records Of Prince Andrew's Location On Night Of Molestation Destroyed By Police
MustangWriter: Authored by John Vibes via TheMindUnleashed.com,

According to a former member of the Royal guard who worked on Prince Andrew’s security detail, The London Metropolitan Police have destroyed evidence that could have revealed where Prince Andrew was on the night that he is accused of having sex with a teenager that was being trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.

The night in question is March 10th, 2011, as well as the morning hours of March 11. Virginia Giuffre, who was known by the name Virginia Roberts at the time, says that she was taken to London by Epstein and Maxwell and was expected to have sex with Prince Andrew.

Giuffre says that she was just 17-years-old at the time and remembers being taken to the “Tramp” nightclub in London, as well as one of Maxwell’s homes in the city.

Andrew was questioned about Giuffre’s accusations during an interview with BBC, and he made numerous mistakes and fumbles that brought his credibility into question.

In the interview, Andrew vehemently denied knowing Giuffre and insisted that he was not at that nightclub on March 10th.

He claimed that he was at a Pizza Express location in Woking, for a party, but at least one other witness has come forward to corroborate Giuffre’s claim. The witness says that she distinctly remembers seeing the prince at the nightclub on that evening.

There should be records of what the prince was doing on that evening, which would either exonerate him or prove that he was lying. Members of the royal family are regularly accompanied by police guards in their day to day activities and there are records of where and when the officers were sent, or at the very least a record of which officers worked on which day.

If these records were to be made available, the investigators could easily determine where Prince Andrew was on the night in question. Initially, police refused to release this information to the media, insisting that revealing such sensitive information about the royal family could be a “threat to national security.”

One of the guards who was assigned to work Andrew’s security detail on that night, remembers having an issue with the prince when he returned to Buckingham Palace.

He says that Andrew ended up making his return to the palace very late that night, but wanted to obtain the records to confirm that this was the same night.

A few months ago, the former guard requested to see his shift records from his time working Andrew’s security detail. He got no response for months, but was eventually contacted by a caseworker with the London Metropolitan Police.

The caseworker told him that the records were destroyed, and said that it is the agency’s policy to only keep records for two years, which is a bit of a strange policy in the computer age where files don’t take up much space.

“I am very disappointed. Why on earth did it take nearly five months to respond with such a non-informative answer? I’m also surprised to discover that any records regarding the Royal family and their police protection are destroyed, much less after just two years,” the guard told the Daily Mail.
Wealthy privilege. scold
Sep 10, 2020 1:30 PM CST Records Of Prince Andrew's Location On Night Of Molestation Destroyed By Police
bigjb62: Wealthy privilege.
More like Royal privilege. But only the Monarch is exempt from prosecution (there anyway, anywhere else it would just be a favor)
Sep 10, 2020 5:30 PM CST Records Of Prince Andrew's Location On Night Of Molestation Destroyed By Police
CossackCat: More like Royal privilege. But only the Monarch is exempt from prosecution (there anyway, anywhere else it would just be a favor)
Some wealthy people by virtue of their wealth think they're royalty.
Sep 11, 2020 2:44 AM CST Records Of Prince Andrew's Location On Night Of Molestation Destroyed By Police
bigjb62: Some wealthy people by virtue of their wealth think they're royalty.
Some stupid people by virtue of their stupidity think they are smart.dunno
Sep 11, 2020 2:55 AM CST Records Of Prince Andrew's Location On Night Of Molestation Destroyed By Police
tomcattyonline now!
tomcattyonline now!tomcattyocean city plymouth, Devon, England UK182 Threads 2 Polls 3,673 Posts
germanspitz: Some stupid people by virtue of their stupidity think they are smart.
Don't be so hard on yourself old girl!!!!!
Sep 11, 2020 3:05 AM CST Records Of Prince Andrew's Location On Night Of Molestation Destroyed By Police
ChesneyChristonline today!
ChesneyChristonline today!ChesneyChristManchester, Greater Manchester, England UK7,504 Posts
Men marry 16 year old Filipinos in this country. It's politically incorrect to do this but I don't think prince Andrew is a paedophile. What men would do if they could is not paedophilia.
Sep 11, 2020 3:34 AM CST Records Of Prince Andrew's Location On Night Of Molestation Destroyed By Police
ChesneyChristonline today!
ChesneyChristonline today!ChesneyChristManchester, Greater Manchester, England UK7,504 Posts
Not that a man should do it if he could. The peak of fertility is very immature in an infantilised world dusty wombs and IVF is one of the reasons so many children have autism in the modern world. People don't grow up that fast anymore and maybe not even at all.
Sep 11, 2020 6:51 AM CST Records Of Prince Andrew's Location On Night Of Molestation Destroyed By Police
tomcatty: Don't be so hard on yourself old girl!!!!!
Well at least I can get hard.tongue rolling on the floor laughing
Sep 11, 2020 6:54 AM CST Records Of Prince Andrew's Location On Night Of Molestation Destroyed By Police
Bassadoronline today!
Bassadoronline today!BassadorTO, Ontario Canada17 Posts
germanspitz: Some stupid people by virtue of their stupidity think they are smart.
Unfortunate for the rest of us. help
Sep 11, 2020 7:03 AM CST Records Of Prince Andrew's Location On Night Of Molestation Destroyed By Police
Bassador: Unfortunate for the rest of us.
Nice to see you hug I concur.
Sep 11, 2020 7:11 AM CST Records Of Prince Andrew's Location On Night Of Molestation Destroyed By Police
tomcattyonline now!
tomcattyonline now!tomcattyocean city plymouth, Devon, England UK182 Threads 2 Polls 3,673 Posts
germanspitz: Well at least I can get hard.
Really, wow wow wow wow you have onelaugh laugh
Post Comment - Post a comment on this Forum Thread

Stats for this Thread

266 Views
12 Comments
by MustangWriter (383 Threads)
Created: Aug 3
Last Viewed: Sep 20
Last Commented: Sep 11

Share this Thread

Post Comment back to top
We use cookies to ensure that you have the best experience possible on our website. Read Our Privacy Policy Here