tomcatty: Prince Andrew demands trial by jury. Takedown that Scarlett Woman Andy.
It would be hard to find a jury 'of his peers'.....they would have to assemble royals from European countries that still have them, like Holland or Spain or Denmark.
snowlynx: It would be hard to find a jury 'of his peers'.....they would have to assemble royals from European countries that still have them, like Holland or Spain or Denmark.
I get where you are coming from, but he is approaching this case as s ordinary man, photoshop pictures and all.
snowlynx: It would be hard to find a jury 'of his peers'.....they would have to assemble royals from European countries that still have them, like Holland or Spain or Denmark.
Which is why he wants a "trial" by jury. However a case involving libel and scandal may still be refused a trial by jury if the Judge believes that the evidence or other matters is too complicated.
tomcatty: Prince Andrew demands trial by jury. Takedown that Scarlett Woman Andy.
Does he think he's the Colston four? Sleeping with 16/17 year olds is politically incorrect, the wrong side of history. It's men wearing the chastity belt now.
ChesneyChrist: Does he think he's the Colston four? Sleeping with 16/17 year olds is politically incorrect, the wrong side of history. It's men wearing the chastity belt now.
Some of these 17 years old are predatory women. Scarlet women
ChesneyChrist: If you've done something politically incorrect then he's going to be found more guilty than he really is, the total opposite of the Colston four.
Apparently, there is already a space up there next to Lewinsky
More than anything you want a judge who would risk their reputation for the sake of truth and justice. Verdicts that are a freedom from the press, not just delivering any man's head to the press and the large section of the public under their control.
tomcatty: I get where you are coming from, but he is approaching this case as s ordinary man, photoshop pictures and all.
Amy vote is for him to get a jury. However, he might get a better deal having a single judge decide…it’s a crap-shoot which would be best. Tread lightly…
I reckon the days of Randy Andy being entitled may soon be over. Who knows what the fallout from this lawsuit might bring to his door. There's a reason the queen distanced herself from him.
Geno2809: I reckon the days of Randy Andy being entitled may soon be over. Who knows what the fallout from this lawsuit might bring to his door. There's a reason the queen distanced herself from him.
It seems you have made up your mind Geno, I hope you never get such arbitrary justice, lets just wait and see.
Not really any of my business this Andrew stuff, but by posting it Tom you kinda make it everybodys business. Guess it's in the name "Forum" so here my twoC:
I understand that it's kinda unfair that only Andy get all the heat as there were other high profilers just as guilty. I get that. What I don't like is that typical Royal fashion deny everything! Including his exwife Sarah Ferguson strongly opposing "those mean accusations", poor lady.
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).