Am a man and I can confidently say I know, to a large extent, what men like to have in women they would agree to live with. On the contrary, I absolutely know nothing about what our ladies look out for. Is it wrong to present exactly one's self? Do I have to flatter and impose in order to hook up a lady of my heart/interest? A thing I can never try. I wanna be myself but by so doing, I appear non-existent in the eyes of these ladies. I need some tutorials girls.Hahahahahaha.
Just be yourself mindpower and you will be alright,shes out there and she will except you for who you are. All it needs is one little thing to touch a womans heart and every guy as it to give. Good Luck x
Should you choose to create a superficial facade, you will eventually tire and will be exposed anyway. Why do it to begin with.
The flattery thing? Pllllllllth. Dumb example, if I get mail from someone new and it's loaded with pet names or too much flowery crap...goes immediately into the block pile. No interest.
What do I look for? Interest. Questions. Silly life stories. Persistance. (Not to be confused with stalking) The possibility of learning something, ability to express a different perspective than mine.
Be myself, feel comfortable when I'm with him. Someone who accepts me for who I am, knowing that I am not perfect and be able to accept me just like that. What attracted me to him, is the way he thinks, they way he sees life, great sense of humor, even silly, which is pretty much they way I am. We are a lot alike. He doesn't try to impress me, he is sensible, good listener and communicator he is just himself and I like that. We have a long way to go yet, but whatever happens will not regretted not even for a minute, for him coming into my life. If it doesn’t work out (hope Not) I would say it was worth, every word, every minute we spent together.
None of these ladies contributing to this thread has mentioned 'the prospect of riches and wealth' and I find this strange. Even so b'cos a sample of ladies' utterances and the experiences of some friends show that more ladies manage to crucify deterrent tendencies when seeking attachment but they never relent in keeping its cross. In other words, the search for "accomplished" single play a key role but they do not speak of it. So I throw that challenge to these nice ladies to sincerely tell the world if it is not true. Do you look for riches and high social status in your man? If yes, how do you see that online?
Can't speak for all, but if you'll look at my profile, it clearly states that money and status does not amuse me. I have had emails immediately stating salary as an attraction, and they immediately hit the block pile.
Pathetic insinuation that financial worth is a factor.
Even more pathetic if you use or think that your status is an asset.
Nope, I don't look for wealth or rich person, but yes I look for someone stable, with courage, character, who confronts life adversities also someone with ambitious and goals, someone who wants a better life, sorry a looser with no vision toward future never catch my attention.
When I was a little girl we were not rich but always had a roof over my head and plenty food on the table, and love from my parents. My mom always says that is better to eat a piece of bread with love than juice meat with sorrow (you figure this out I'm translating from Spanish).
In my case how did I see it online, well reading his post and him reading mine, communicating and doing some research, in fact we found each other. Will it work, we don't know yet but is worth the try. So posting is a good tool to find someone, be yourself, be sincere, don't overdue it, don't try to impress, becuase as Crash2 said, one day you will not be able to pretend any more. So one more time be yourself and someone will notice you and you can stop looking she will find you or find each other.
I assure you that there are plenty of women here that are worth the try.
Great points ladies. A question to crash...what does persistance consist of exactly? I ask this because if I send a flower/message to someone and they quite simply do not respond, then for me, their interest factor is nil.
Persistance...perhaps if I don't immediately get back to someone, I've had an extraordinarily busy day. Maybe I thought I wrote but didn't. Or, best of all, the wording or subject matter of the first correspondence might not have triggered an interest, but the second may do so. A second attempt also shows you just weren't going down the row sending bogus, generic emails.
Yeah and if two emails doesn't do it, pester the hell out of them. After awhile you'll wear down thier deffenses and they give up and write you. Although it may not be what you want to hear.lol It show determination.LOL If its flowers you are sending neveeer use the choices given to ya always write your own.
I tend to be like Tumpa, not just in emails, but in person too. If I ask a woman out and she basically says now (without indicating any interest in a possible rain check). I take that to pretty much mean that she isn't the slightest bit interested. Continuing to hit on her would feel like stalking to me.
Also, I think when I was fairly young I did tend to press on in spite of early disinterest. Unfortunately younger women have little patient and would eventually snap back with something like "Don't you get it? Get lost!"
I really don't care to push things to that point. I'd rather just drop it early and chalk it up to being her loss. Why force a woman to tell you to get lost? So if a woman expects me to be persistent she's going to need to at least give some kind of hints that she doesn't mind me hitting on her. She could do that by suggesting the possibility of a rain check, or giving some other explanation of why now was just not a good time, but to just flatly no respond, or to respond with a pretty definite no. Well, I take that to mean that she's just plain not interested period. I won't press it from that point no matter how perfect I think we might be for each other. She obviously doesn't feel the same way.
The other thing too. It seems strange to me that a woman would complain about not being able to find a great guy and then not bother to respond or engage in conversation with a potential partner who's showing an interest. Seems to me that if she's putting him off at that point she must have already decided that he's not what she's looking for.
There's a fine line between being persistent and being a pain. I don't want to be known as a man who crosses it, so I just don't even go near it to begin with.
Heck, I even write to women and tell them that I'm just writing as a friend because I identified with stuff they said in their profile. I clearly state that I'm hot hitting on them and that I'm just sharing conversation.
We are talking nicely about how good to persist, as if by so doing one will certainly get what he wants. sorry, that is never go na come if, with reference to the first thread that brought about the question of persistence, what is in you or about you is not at all what that lady is looking for. We each have our interests and targets as we walk along the road everyday and moment. Persistence therefore would mean you not only wasting your precious time but ominously treading along the paths of blatant rejection, regret and shame. Personally I exude a lot of love when I find one, but I scarcely allow any angel to play God as if the former was my creator. You may allow a woman time to think about your proposal. But in the process refrain from pushing her. Anyway, that's me. I can talk to a woman about love just once. Maybe am such a bad guy b'cos I don't persist; hahahahaha.
Could you imagine having sent a mail or flower to a lady and she refuses to open it just to see the kind of creature you represent, even though she has been online a number of times afterwards. If you wanna rest on such women you will definitely rust there. You can only persist where the lady has given you cause to. Actions, they say, speak louder than words.
The thing I look for most is someone who is emotionally stable. By that I am saying not someone who is jealous, obsessive, possessive, these are not qualities that I find attractive or acceptable. I think you should also be able to have all preexisting relationships behind you and not bring them into the one you want now. I also think that a man in order to find a mate should be financial stable in that saying at least be able to take care of himself. No riches does not make one happy, but if you cant take care of yourself then how can you provide for a mate. I believe honesty is a big issue because most guys appear online and are totally opposite of what they say in their profiles. I also feel you should not want to change your partner. Because in life I have realized people dont change, whatever attracted you to that person, you should not need to change it later on such as hair, make up,weight and, clothing. I also dont find a negative attitude towards the shallow things in life very attractive either. If you cannot be up when the chips are down then you are not a good shoulder to lean on.
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).