Last Thursday, on the floor of the House during a debate on SCHIP, Congressman Pete Stark, an 18-term Democratic from California, accused Republicans of funding the war in Iraq, but not caring about children's health care and in that vein voiced the following
"You don't have money to fund the war or children. But you're going to spend it to blow up innocent people -- if we can get enough kids to grow old enough for you to send to Iraq to get their heads blown off for the President's amusement."
Before I ask your opinion, I want it known that I am not only against the Iraq War, but also disagee with President Bush's handling of it. But my feeling is that no matter what one's politics are, all of us, including members of Congress, owe the Office of the Presidency respect, no matter who is in that office.
Even though I disagree with Bush's handling of the War, it is outrageous for a member of Congress to accuse a sitting President of "wanting American soldiers' heads blown off for his amusement," particulary when it was said on the floor of the United States House of Representatives. Stark not only sunk to an utterly ugly low level of debate with his vicious attack, but he dishonored the House of Representatives with his despicable remarks.
Here is my question ... Do you think Congressman Stark had a right to accuse the President of the United States of America of sending soldiers to Iraq to get their heads blown off for the President's amusement? OOr, do you go along with my feelings? Additionally, do you believe that when we criticize any president, rightly or wrongly, should there be a line that should not be crossed? Or, do you feel we can say anything we want about the president, whether it is the utmost flattery or debase criticism?
The person who is making the remarks may have been personally hurt by the person he is addressing, and may have felt powerless to do anything about it, but now he found his voice, and he is making it ggod, and known....either that or he could have collapse from all the anger he bottled up within.
shipoker55..... If a Republican lawmaker said those things, this thread would most definitely be here, because it would be more of an afront to the Office of the Presidency.
Incidentally, I stated that I disagree with the Iraq War. Additionally, I made it known that I do not like the way Bush is handling it, or perhaps I should say mishandling it. I stated these facts, not to be right or left wing, but to let everyone know my position since I started the thread. Enough said; let's skip the politics and stick to the thread.
The thread is about whether the Office of the Presidency was or was not respected by Congressman Stark. In connection with respecting that office, I learned it when I was a little girl. I was fortunate in that I went to a private school. In elementary school, we didn't have Social Studies, we had History, Geography, and Civics. I remember the Civics teacher emphasizing over and over that we must love and respect America and the Office of the Presidency. My Civics teacher would use the phrase "America, my country, right or wrong" to emphasize his point.
Zoomzoom....... Good point ..... I never thought of that, but you are correct. I have been in so many situations where I hear people say that, and I always think, but he/she does mean (whatever).
shipoker55..... I started the thread; therefore, I should respond to what people are saying. How can I address your comments by addressing them to myself?! That doesn't make sense.
If you do not want me to respond to your comments, then do not say anything that requires a response from me. Again, I started the thread; therefore, I have a right to reply to comments. Please do not destroy the thread by starting a silly to-do about nothing.
I agree with WHAT he said, but not HOW it was said. Too much, too over the top. It was wrong.
The math itself is a bit sickening - that health care plan would run $7 bil a YEAR - the war is $15 bil a MONTH. And now $191 billion is being sought to fund it further. Nice. This additional health care plan was originally supported by GW, and in fact, was a GOP idea years back. It had mass bipartisan support back then.
If everything were inverted, Dem's seeking war funds and blocking children's health care, I would still be disgusted. As it is, politics as per usual.
I can agree that the last part of the Congressmans remark(for his amusement) was over the top. IS THERE A LINE THAT A PRESIDENT CROSSES THAT DEFAMES AND MAKES LITTLE HIS OR HERS OATH OF OFFICE??? To uphold the CONSTITUTION LAST AND FOREMOST!!! We are having rights and liberties slowly taken away from us daily. This "WAR POWERS ACT" congress has given to Presidents must be taken back. OF THE PEOPLE, FOR THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE. We do not vote for dictators who say it does not matter what the majority of the people say or think. This President has lied repeatedly, it's all on videotape. "I will not and have not eavesdropped on American Citizens" 2004. 2006 " Sorry, it was for NATIONAL SECURITY" If our leader lies to us they should be impeached.
I never said you were not welcome on the thread. Everyone is welcome, especially those who have a different viewpoint from me since that makes for an informative thread. Threads are boring if everyone agrees with each other.
So, please re-read my comments and you will find that your remarks are welcome, particularly since I suspect that you do not agree with me. You will keep the thread from being one-sided.
You mentioned “18-term Democratic from California” This man is from the old school. He can getaway with situations like that. He spoke his piece and at the same time exercising what he strongly believes in (freedom of speech).
As for insulting our President, I agree with you to an extent. Yes, being raised with the teachings and values of respecting authority figures, may it be in the political arena or not is the norm. But, this does not mean that you have to continue to have respect for those leaders that you believe are doing harm or going against some or all of those values that you were raised to believe and have faith in.
As long as our President’s life is not threatened, there shouldn’t be a fine line with regards to freedom of speech. Any form of limitations otherwise would be the opposite.
traveler46...... You make a good point. That line that no one should cross should also apply to the President, particularly since he has taken an oath of office.
I agree with you that we are having rights and liberties slowly taken away from us.
Addressing your statement on dictators ..... you are right in your assessment that most of the people we put into public office, Republican and Democratic, do not care what the majority of the people say or think. All they care about is being in office and having power. I hate to admit this, but I no longer belong to any party. When it comes to voting I no longer vote for the best man/woman. There is no such individual. When I cast my vote, it is for the person that I think will do the least bit of damage. I am ashamed to admit that I am so jaded, but this is what these politicians have done to me. And it is all because, repeating your words, politicians feel that "it does not matter what the majority of the people say or think," they act like dictators.
The reason there is a battle over the SCHIPS is because the intent was changed. Initially it was to be for people living at or below poverty level, but the poverty level was tripled. Consequently, those eligible can make as much as $82,000. Additionally, the age of insurable children was raised to include those up to age 21. Consequently, the health care plan is going to cost a lot more than seven billion dollars a year.
Yes, you are right .... politics as usual. I don't think either Democrats or Republicans care about the children, except to get re-elected.
Yes, the math on the war is sickening. We have crime and poverty in the inner cities. I'll bet we could do a lot to stamp that out with 191 billion dolllars. And the rest of the money that was spent, we probably could have had health care, not only for the children, but for the whole nation.
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
"You don't have money to fund the war or children. But you're going to spend it to blow up innocent people -- if we can get enough kids to grow old enough for you to send to Iraq to get their heads blown off for the President's amusement."
Before I ask your opinion, I want it known that I am not only against the Iraq War, but also disagee with President Bush's handling of it. But my feeling is that no matter what one's politics are, all of us, including members of Congress, owe the Office of the Presidency respect, no matter who is in that office.
Even though I disagree with Bush's handling of the War, it is outrageous for a member of Congress to accuse a sitting President of "wanting American soldiers' heads blown off for his amusement," particulary when it was said on the floor of the United States House of Representatives. Stark not only sunk to an utterly ugly low level of debate with his vicious attack, but he dishonored the House of Representatives with his despicable remarks.
Here is my question ... Do you think Congressman Stark had a right to accuse the President of the United States of America of sending soldiers to Iraq to get their heads blown off for the President's amusement? OOr, do you go along with my feelings? Additionally, do you believe that when we criticize any president, rightly or wrongly, should there be a line that should not be crossed? Or, do you feel we can say anything we want about the president, whether it is the utmost flattery or debase criticism?