What is your take on this? (19)

Aug 7, 2008 7:37 PM CST What is your take on this?
eyesthatknowwhy
eyesthatknowwhyeyesthatknowwhyWhitehorse, Yukon Territory Canada88 Threads 1,405 Posts
Disgusting to sayt the very least - and I don't have the imagination capable of putting the two together???? thumbs down barf
Aug 7, 2008 7:41 PM CST What is your take on this?
KHD100
KHD100KHD100Edmonton, Alberta Canada129 Threads 3 Polls 2,495 Posts
eyesthatknowwhy: Disgusting to sayt the very least - and I don't have the imagination capable of putting the two together????
Shows that the 2 brain cells that put this together might have come from a pair of implants... and no actual though was put to this.
Aug 7, 2008 7:45 PM CST What is your take on this?
Katine76again
Katine76againKatine76againMoncton, New Brunswick Canada1 Threads 115 Posts
OMG That is disgusting and very appaling to say the least!!

Not a good way to compare for their add. Jeesh what is the matter with some people!!!

sigh very mad
Aug 7, 2008 9:39 PM CST What is your take on this?
KHD......The ad by Peta would be at the lowest of the lowest, and this is how they get their attention .......the ad by the bus company had been cancelled prior to that horrendous incident, but unfortunately some of them hadn't been taken down and were still in some bus shelters, but have since been ordered removed.
The effect of the message last a long time, and I am sure Peta gave no thought to the families and passengers that were so affected by this tragedy. They ought to send out an apology immediately, but knowing how they campaign, it will be a long time coming.
Aug 7, 2008 9:52 PM CST What is your take on this?
eyesthatknowwhy
eyesthatknowwhyeyesthatknowwhyWhitehorse, Yukon Territory Canada88 Threads 1,405 Posts
frustrated frustrated
I don't understand the connection between the vision of Peta and the tragic loss of Tim - but I am pretty damn sure that Peta is getting something out of all of this - we are talking about it, and how many times are we saying or typing Peta? It is giving them, if nothing else notoriety and publicity and that is what they strive for...Their acronym will be at the tips of many tonques...JMO idea
Aug 7, 2008 10:03 PM CST What is your take on this?
KHD100
KHD100KHD100Edmonton, Alberta Canada129 Threads 3 Polls 2,495 Posts
mychelle: KHD......The ad by Peta would be at the lowest of the lowest, and this is how they get their attention .......the ad by the bus company had been cancelled prior to that horrendous incident, but unfortunately some of them hadn't been taken down and were still in some bus shelters, but have since been ordered removed.
The effect of the message last a long time, and I am sure Peta gave no thought to the families and passengers that were so affected by this tragedy. They ought to send out an apology immediately, but knowing how they campaign, it will be a long time coming.


I got very angry and then cried. Did not think it would effect me that much.
Then read the thread about some church group wanting to go to this young man's funeral and protest about his life style... He fought over seas.
Aug 7, 2008 10:30 PM CST What is your take on this?
Loner1960
Loner1960Loner1960St. Alphonse, Manitoba Canada15 Threads 402 Posts
P - people
E - eating
T - tasty
A - animals

Put that in your mind when you see the word PETA.
Aug 8, 2008 8:39 AM CST What is your take on this?
Loner1960: P - people
E - eating
T - tasty
A - animals

Put that in your mind when you see the word PETA.


I think you got the real idea.thumbs up
Aug 8, 2008 8:42 AM CST What is your take on this?
KHD100: I got very angry and then cried. Did not think it would effect me that much.
Then read the thread about some church group wanting to go to this young man's funeral and protest about his life style... He fought over seas.


One has to marvel at some things some group would do, they are people nonetheless. A prayer is in order. Please God , help us, guide us to make the right decisions in each and every way possible.
Aug 8, 2008 10:40 PM CST What is your take on this?
KHD100
KHD100KHD100Edmonton, Alberta Canada129 Threads 3 Polls 2,495 Posts
NDP MP Pat Martin said his office was flooded with phone calls Thursday from Winnipeggers offended by the group’s plan.

“These people (the WBC) are almost as crazy as the murderer,” he said, referring to the protesters’ intentions.

“If they are here to disrupt the social order, that constitutes grounds to deny them entry. There is no redeeming virtue in the message they are bringing.”

Martin said Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day’s office sent an alert to border patrol to “look out” for people with signs and pamphlets that fit the hateful messages that the church promotes and to keep them out of the country.


“In the opinion of his office, coming up here with the message they’re articulating constitutes hate speech,” Martin said.

Shirley Phelps-Roper, daughter of church’s founder, Fred Phelps, said a small group of protesters was stopped at the Canada-U.S. border Thursday afternoon.

“They won’t let us in, but we have a group that will cross in another spot,” she said. “They’ll have to strip search everyone who crosses that border or they won’t know who we are. They’ll have to see the WBC (Westboro Baptist Church) tattoo on our butts.”

The Westboro group has been branded as a hate group and is known for protesting the funerals of American soldiers.

The group failed to show Thursday night for a scheduled protest of the opening night of Toronto playwright Alistair Newton’s “The Pastor Phelps Project: a fundamentalist cabaret” which satirizes their leader’s fervent anti-gay stance.

Members had also planned to picket on Friday night outside a performance in Red Deer, Alta., of “The Laramie Project,” a play based on the murder of Matthew Shepard, a young gay man in Wyoming. Winnipeg police say they aren’t planning to block Westboro Church protesters if they get across the border, but are prepared to be on hand if necessary.
Aug 9, 2008 9:46 AM CST What is your take on this?
KHD100
KHD100KHD100Edmonton, Alberta Canada129 Threads 3 Polls 2,495 Posts
I must be a nut case..... First thought as I woke up..... Crap (used S word to be honest)... it's too damned hot!!!

Second thought... hope that church group does not show up at Tim's funeral or near his family and friends. Don't even know this young man or his family, but for some odd reason, I keep repeating in my head... Hope that group stays away... over and over.

Oh well.... dog is in bad need of a hair cut. Rest of the day will be spent cleaning up the hair. grin
Aug 9, 2008 10:29 AM CST What is your take on this?
hollandgirl
hollandgirlhollandgirlSomewhere in Canada. B.C., British Columbia Canada523 Threads 4,464 Posts
Can't add a thing to what has been said here.
I am a Christian but could not imagen wanting to use the horrendous happening of this poor man who was murdered to use at a platform for hatred.
Trust me these people may be church goers, but for sure NOT Christians.
God teaches us to love.
teddybear
Aug 16, 2008 4:22 PM CST What is your take on this?
KHD100
KHD100KHD100Edmonton, Alberta Canada129 Threads 3 Polls 2,495 Posts
Dear PETA,

I read with some surprise your reassurance that "PETA's ad comparing Tim McLean Jr.'s murder with the fate of animals who are killed for their flesh is certainly not meant to upset anyone."

Surely, the purpose of comparing a man who was brutally beheaded to the plight of farm animals is to shock people. People who are shocked are invariably upset as well. So your position seems dishonest at best, and cold-hearted and cynical. I'd suggest that, regardless of what you think of barbaric meat-eaters, you had to know his family would be rather upset by any billboards comparing their son to a dead cow.

Most of us eat meat. We do it because our bodies are designed to do it; just like those creatures you 'protect', human beings are part of the animal food chain. And while you may see that chain as barbaric, I haven't seen any PETA officials traipsing into the forest to dress down a bear for eating meat. I'd like to, but I haven't.

Human societies dictate the course of justice in large part on what is "natural" behaviour. It does not suggest that, simply because we have a greater exercise of free will, we should stop being true to that nature. Rather, we have adapted societies to accept -- albeit with occasional revulsion -- many natural things we do.

When it come to meat, that may sound nasty and cold-blooded to a vegan. But it is human reality; we are the master of our domain precisely because we have the ability to shepherd it. We are not driven to kill animals by a frenzied urge to obtain protein. That implies a lack of conscious choice. We do it because we feel it is normal -- a rationalized choice, but a choice.

The beheading of Mr. McLean, on the other hand, was an act that no human could see as anything other than sheer lunacy. No one makes a rational choice to behead a fellow human. So there is absolutely no "apt" parallel, as you so callously stated in your letter.

The family of the steak I ate last night may, you are right, have been traumatized by his sudden disappearance ... for the four seconds it took to flit through their underdeveloped brains. But they do not sit up at night, waiting in vain. They do not look back at years of fond memories and emotional bonds and wonder what might have been. They not grieve for years.

So it is not even slightly "apt" to compare Tim McLean Jr. to a dead cow. As such, the emotional damage you unleashed on parents to whom "your hearts go out" demonstrates the essence of inhumanity: the ability to disconnect yourself emotionally from society.

PETA hates cruelty, and yet when it feels the need, it can justify behaving in a cruel way. What a strange and savage hypocrisy.



banana
Aug 16, 2008 4:56 PM CST What is your take on this?
gemery
gemerygemeryWilliams Lake, British Columbia Canada5 Threads 509 Posts
The above 'Dear Peta' letter is something I agree with Kim.
What PETA is overlooking is just how simple it really is. " For something to live, something else must die." Doesn't matter if it is a cow or a carrot. It is part of the natural cycle and as long as it is done in a human manner with no suffering, I have no objection.

KHD100: PETA hates cruelty, and yet when it feels the need, it can justify behaving in a cruel way. What a strange and savage hypocrisy.


The old double standard syndrome.

And as for the Baptists, I agree with Hollandgirl....they may go to church, but they sure ain't Christians. Let's hope that family can have the funeral in peace.

geo
Aug 26, 2008 4:28 PM CST What is your take on this?
throwback2006
throwback2006throwback2006Halifax, Nova Scotia Canada1 Posts
Well, don't blame PETA, blame the media. Obviously a slow news day!confused professor
Aug 26, 2008 6:46 PM CST What is your take on this?
KHD100
KHD100KHD100Edmonton, Alberta Canada129 Threads 3 Polls 2,495 Posts
throwback2006: Well, don't blame PETA, blame the media. Obviously a slow news day!


PETA wanted to place those ads in the papers. Papers refused. I blame PETA for taking a tragic incident and trying to use and compare it to what happens to animals.

The media did not approach PETA ... I don't understand the comment "don't blame PETA, blame the media." I blame PETA for acting and thinking that they could compare the young man's death to slaughter of animals, and then saying it would not happen, because animals do not have that kind of rage... I beg to differ. Animals lash out if stressed, attacked, etc. Animals also have emotional problems, chemical imbalances, and mental problems.

I just felt that PETA were insensitive to what happened to the young man.handshake
Aug 27, 2008 3:08 AM CST What is your take on this?
eyesthatknowwhy
eyesthatknowwhyeyesthatknowwhyWhitehorse, Yukon Territory Canada88 Threads 1,405 Posts
KHD100: PETA wanted to place those ads in the papers. Papers refused. I blame PETA for taking a tragic incident and trying to use and compare it to what happens to animals.

The media did not approach PETA ... I don't understand the comment "don't blame PETA, blame the media." I blame PETA for acting and thinking that they could compare the young man's death to slaughter of animals, and then saying it would not happen, because animals do not have that kind of rage... I beg to differ. Animals lash out if stressed, attacked, etc. Animals also have emotional problems, chemical imbalances, and mental problems.

I just felt that PETA were insensitive to what happened to the young man.


applause innocent I agree K
Aug 31, 2008 11:47 PM CST What is your take on this?
katatoneohya
katatoneohyakatatoneohyaOshawa, Ontario Canada4 Posts
I believe PETA has overstepped it's mark several times lately.

As a vegan of 26 years...I agree with the thought that eating or wearing an animal is the same as eating a human...disgusting! It's just that meat eaters don't see it that way.

Oh well...the world is at war in thought and deed.

thumbs down
Sep 1, 2008 1:35 AM CST What is your take on this?
KHD100
KHD100KHD100Edmonton, Alberta Canada129 Threads 3 Polls 2,495 Posts
katatoneohya: I believe PETA has overstepped it's mark several times lately.

As a vegan of 26 years...I agree with the thought that eating or wearing an animal is the same as eating a human...disgusting! It's just that meat eaters don't see it that way.

Oh well...the world is at war in thought and deed.


I very much respect your choice, my problem was how PETA tried to use a tragic event and twist it so they could use it for their own purposes and not stop and think about the young man, the murderer, or both their families.

Welcome to the group katatoneohya!
Post Comment - Post a comment on this Forum Thread

Share this Thread

We use cookies to ensure that you have the best experience possible on our website. Read Our Privacy Policy Here