Who is responsible of hunger in developing countries ? ( Archived) (68)

Corruption,backwardness,superstition,to name a few reasons.....

West is to afraid to put pressure on "developing"countries,in fear of being called "imperialists" or likewise...Birthcontrol would actually help...

However,-let´s turn the table,and ask ourselves,-why has/is the almost entire African continent had such an enormous population growth for the last 100 yrs?

The answer is simple,-better life conditions!

And who made that possible?

Answer,-the developed nations!

But,for some strange reason,-that is never brought up,in contrary...,instead,-it´s the developed world´s "fault",that it has turned out this way.......

But to make a long story short,-the "developing" ones are responsible themselves......like it or not....

Are you serious?

Apart from corruption, and the west owning a lot of the responsibility, but - lol?

Wht didn't you include the Ukraine, Vietnam or china. Yes, you guys won't be able to build enough boats fast enough so you all can move to north America to get out of china's way as it rolls over all of Europe in a few years.

They need only to have their leaders make better deals Ray. Or, get better leaders.



Strange that aid is sent to alleviate just that in billions of dollars from half the world to the other half each year.

How is it my responsibility that some guy prefers to work in a copper mine rather than starve?

And anybody who tries to change that fact for whatever reason is in the wrong it seems.

I am not an advocate for external intervention. The US has proven fairly conclusively over the last 60 years that it almost never achieves success by any measure.

The Arab spring, however, has given renewed hope that people from individual nations can do it for themselves and try for new and fairer forms of governance. Of course, some will be more successful than others but it has shown that, if you have sufficient courage, the mechanisms are there for citizenry to make changes to Draconian administrations for the benefit of their own nation, by force, if necessary.

They've stopped the world from going communist which is a far greater feat than playing a fairly decisive factor in two world wars.



Indeed. The intervention and influence of the Muslim Brotherhood is alright but woe be to the world that any other entity should attempt to sway the population.

Unwanted? I couldn't care less if you hated me or, if you loved me. This is a discussion forum and your personal acceptance of me is meaningless. That this emotional hubris has meaning to you shows how out of touch you are with the simple act of discussing factual political current events.





I doubt it. At best you'r a high school student who from time to time turns on the radio and forms an opinon and at worst, trolls forums to vent but in any case, you have no control over my posts or my factually based, precision targeted political views. As well, your potty mouthed orders really give your baseline away.



Ok. Here's the test for you then. I am oing to ask you what you meant and we shall see if the result is any different then it was......

You said;

olaix""Best conduct for political affairs is like this;

We may know how it is best for us to live. We don't know how its best for others to live. If we want a better life, it is our challenge, not anyone elses, and vice verse. ""

What exactly did you mean?



I get it, you make up words and then build entire premiss around self composed meanings for phrases with universal meanings and I'm the boring guy for pointing it out.

First I think you might try cleaning up your language, then try to use words that describe what you're trying to say rather than make your own up and then of course, try not to troll as you do from time to time when you really don't get it.

I'll remove the spam I wont reply to to avoid the wall of text.



You're probably sorry, but also a liar, because what you're sorry for is not this. Also, you pretend to care a whole lot about the direction of the threads, which you prove you're not, by not only following this post, but the previous one, and dusins of others, into derail and flames, as it seemed meaningless to the subject at hand, for you. So you can start by eating your own garbage, or walk the walk



You are trying to change that. Since I had no quote in my post, it makes it hard for you to have any basis yourself, that I was refuting anyone, it was probably at such a perspective you cannot even fathom, in a way that is totally strange to you. That you're to stupid to understand something, alberta, does not mean its not true or it does not exist. This is a sign of real stupidity, as of the man who knows a lot, knows he knows very little, while the one know knows nothing, think he knows everything.

And since I wasn't refuting anyone, excusing, justifying or supporting someone, why would I need to provide a basis? You can get one if you beg, since its you, alberta. As well as an explanation on the nature of a internet forum




And you are again failing in replying to what I wrote. Like the rest

Now, let us see if you care about the direction of the thread, because I will. If you are really sorry, and if you can fight your compulsion, the agony of not getting the last word and go on, discussing the "matter at hand".

Cya mr intellectual

I think that no one should bring more Children into the world than their means can support otherwise its someone else's money that's being used. Effective family planning is the key

I'll remove the spam I wont reply to to avoid the wall of text.

I will narrow it down for you then;


You said;

olaix""Best conduct for political affairs is like this;

We may know how it is best for us to live. We don't know how its best for others to live. If we want a better life, it is our challenge, not anyone elses, and vice verse. ""

What exactly did you mean?

I will narrow it down for you then;


You said;

olaix""Best conduct for political affairs is like this;

We may know how it is best for us to live. We don't know how its best for others to live. If we want a better life, it is our challenge, not anyone elses, and vice verse. ""

What exactly did you mean?

I think politician r worst than nuclear bomb in country like India.I think they can sell there mom & sister also for money.Kill them.

Well, first of all you will have to explain to me why you could not ask like this in the first place

Simply because it and the surrounding points seemed geared to direct developed countries to leave undeveloped countries alone. That you now infer it had another meaning brings me to ask what exactly you meant.

So, what did you mean since you are not saying some countries should leave other countries alone?

And what do you say when you've bothered people because your lack of observation?

As I said, with the entire context of your post I believe I have extrapolated the correct meaning. I now offer you this opportunity to clarify. If you don't I'll just surmise your intention was to recommend that developed countries leave undeveloped countries alone and view your obfuscation as waffling on this point.

I'll be here from time to time as I have a few other things to take care of today if and when you get around to it so take your time.