Conrad you're so pathetic. You said I had not posted about that subject in the link. Now you going on about if they have a case or not. That is not what you were saying. You said I did not post about The Department of Social Justice is contemplating several charges against George Zimmerman. I pointed you to post 251 where I had already told people about it.
So don't try to squirm out of the fact that you got it WRONG again!
I did glance at your link. And it is that link that mentions the department of Social Justice. Not me! I provided the same details days ago but actually mentioned a department that does exist!
As usual you come out with a one line answer that means nothing. You supplied a link that gave info that I had given days ago. Only the info I gave was more accurate. You claimed I had not given the info so I told you the number of the exact post! As usual you were wrong.
But we all know you knew nothing of this case till you seen the thread on Sunday. It was up all day Saturday and you did not post on it. I posted on Sunday and all of a sudden you were an expert on the case!
The whole place knows you're a google warrior. See a subject. Google away for a few mins and all of a sudden you're a expert and the man who knows all.
In response to: sofar....We do have NW in Ireland but Killing someone is not a perk that is allowed for being a member. It is called Neighbourhood WATCH. Their job is to observe and call the police. Not follow or confront suspicious people. And as Zimmerman was told not to follow Trayvon I am sure the NW in the US have the same rules. P.S Zimmerman was not on patrol that night...he was running an errand.
@ sofur, It was a question. (Which you did answer a bit of that) but It seems you have a need to offer more useless drivel ( your crusade). I do not think you have a clue to what is normal in Florida on a night Watch. And I also doubt that you can read minds or know what happened that night, nor do I think you understand the laws of that state and I am pretty sure you did not sit on the jury. You have posted enough for me to know that you don;t have a clue what goes on here in the states and how it differs in so many ways in so many states. Nope. just your self indulgence in arguing something that will have no effect from your posts.
sofarsogood74: We do have NW in Ireland but Killing someone is not a perk that is allowed for being a member. It is called Neighbourhood WATCH. Their job is to observe and call the police. Not follow or confront suspicious people. And as Zimmerman was told not to follow Trayvon I am sure the NW in the US have the same rules.
P.S Zimmerman was not on patrol that night...he was running an errand.
Obviously, you have a comprehension issue with the facts in the Zimmerman case and want to have it heard again. He was found not guilty of the charges against him.
Nickogas: @ sofur, It was a question. (Which you did answer a bit of that) but It seems you have a need to offer more useless drivel ( your crusade). I do not think you have a clue to what is normal in Florida on a night Watch. And I also doubt that you can read minds or know what happened that night, nor do I think you understand the laws of that state and I am pretty sure you did not sit on the jury. You have posted enough for me to know that you don;t have a clue what goes on here in the states and how it differs in so many ways in so many states. Nope. just your self indulgence in arguing something that will have no effect from your posts
What part of your question did I not answer?
And I dont care what goes on in a night watch. What relevance has that got. He wasn't on a watch. He was running an errand.
Also is following innocent people and calling them punks part of a night watch? End of the day the FACT is we only have Zimmermans word that Trayvon started the fight...thats a fact even his defence could not argue with.
But we had also evidence to the contrary where a friend of Trayvon said Trayvon said on the phone Zimmerman was approaching him. We also know the police told him NOT to follow Trayvon. We know NW don't have powers to question or arrest innocent folk. And we know Trayvon done nothing illegal that night when Zimmerman called him a punk and started following him. That's what we know.
garlands: Obviously, you have a comprehension issue with the facts in the Zimmerman case and want to have it heard again. He was found not guilty of the charges against him
I know he was found not guilty. Hence the thread and discussion. You are not the sharpest tool are you?
OJ was found not guilty too you know.
IMO it was a wrong decision that gives open season to all Dirty Harry wannabes out there to confront and shoot who they want. Doesn't matter if they are innocent kids walking home from the shop.
sofarsogood74: I know he was found not guilty. Hence the thread and discussion. You are not the sharpest tool are you?
OJ was found not guilty too you know.
IMO it was a wrong decision that gives open season to all Dirty Harry wannabes out there to confront and shoot who they want. Doesn't matter if they are innocent kids walking home from the shop.
why do you keep repeating all your lies about the Zimmerman case? You weren't there.
btw, most dispatchers here are civil service servants working in collective bargaining positions, not LEOs. NW personnel can use their own discretion in their watch.
Dont' you realize that most rational people reading your dribble recognize that you are a very hateful person and are full of it?
theusername: why do you keep repeating all your lies about the Zimmerman case? You weren't there.
btw, most dispatchers here are civil service servants working in collective bargaining positions, not LEOs. NW personnel can use their own discretion in their watch.
Dont' you realize that most rational people reading your dribble recognize that you are a very hateful person and are full of it?
I'm hateful because I think the murder of a child who was walking home from the shops is something that should be punished? But you were the one with your dancing and laughing emoticons in this thread talking about a Dead child. So who is the hateful one really?
And can you point out one lie I said about Zimmerman please. It is you lot lying when you state that Trayvon attacked him like that is a fact. When you really know we only have Zimmermans word for that. And the whole case rests on the word of the man who pulled the trigger.
2intrigued: As it stands, Zimmerman may be a free man but he's a marked man.
and you think what the Press did to this innocent individual corret and proper, making him a marked man and that his court experience is something everyone should go through because they were forced into defending their life. Psst that is just in my book
I seen that Juror B37 said ""I think both were responsible for the situation they had gotten themselves into," she told Cooper. "I think they both could have walked away."
This poses more questions though. Why did she fin Zimmerman not guilty of Manslaughter then? One is dead and one walks when she thinks both were to blame?
Glitch101London, Greater London, England UK1,079 posts
Seems we have a hung jury within the Forums.
The taking of anyone's life is a serious matter and will have consequences. Each country's laws will vary and what is unacceptable to us may be quite acceptable to others.
Maligning a dead child serves no purpose whatsoever.
There will be a price to pay for taking this boy's life that's for sure.
Yes,he is marked. So as someone said earlier, there will be a retaliation and I suppose people will call that the real justice. Or maybe it will be popular action. If laws are not working they need to be fixed. But when those laws are just ignored and made to be a joke. At that time there is no law. There are people that want that. It is called Anarchy. Can you imagine 300 million living next door that are simply in a free for all? It might not be so great. And people like the one that is far far away will simply laugh. It is not a joke to me. It is to him. Canada is my neighbor. I want that our countries always keep a common goal and at least a friendly relation. maybe I am getting old but I do not want to see things like riots and vigilantes serving there brand of justice.
sofarsogood74: @theresmyFriendI seen that Juror B37 said ""I think both were responsible for the situation they had gotten themselves into," she told Cooper. "I think they both could have walked away."
This poses more questions though. Why did she fin Zimmerman not guilty of Manslaughter then? One is dead and one walks when she thinks both were to blame?
Doesn't make sense at all.
you'll figure it out one of these days, hopefully.
@Galrads...it is what it is...the public is pissed and he could still face some serious legal consequences. He's going to need more than a gun and vest to walk as a free man imho.
Conrad73: Only Opinion that matters is the one of the Jury! They are the only one who have seen all the Evidence!
And as in the Casey Anthony trial, when she was found not guilty of murdering her daughter, the jury spoke and the ruling can never be changed in the eyes of the law.
The eyes of the public is another matter. The people of the community in Sanford have an opinion as well as members of CS but no matter how many ways you look at it, he is still not guilty.
I think Zimmerman is a loose canyon and so do many others on here but it doesn't matter what we think. It has become a subject for discussion all over the country even to causing riots. It will fade away once the next catastrophe happens.
Glitch101London, Greater London, England UK1,079 posts
Galrads:and you think what the Press did to this innocent individual corret and proper, making him a marked man and that his court experience is something everyone should go through because they were forced into defending their life. Psst that is just in my book
He made himself a marked man by his actions.
None of the people on this site were there,we can only draw our own conclusions from what we are fed by the Media. So if people's opinions differ from yours that's their choice
It's called having a discussion.
You spend most of your time slagging off the " tiny island" that is the UK ,put your own house in order first.
@Galrads...it is what it is...the public is pissed and he could still face some serious legal consequences. He's going to need more than a gun and vest to walk as a free man imho. wine
Zimmerman doesn't deserve what the Press did to him; no one does.
So how long will this be going on? A week? A month? 6 months?
Its done and there is not a damn thing any of us can say or do to change the outcome so my advice to all would be to check out some of the other threads because this back and forth is just going to make people miserable.
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
So don't try to squirm out of the fact that you got it WRONG again!