At one time female obedience was seemingly universal. But it still hasn't gone away. "Domestic discipline" and related sites seem to be becoming more frequent.
DedovixBig Place, Central Serbia Serbia5,492 posts
Jaikaan: At one time female obedience was seemingly universal. But it still hasn't gone away. "Domestic discipline" and related sites seem to be becoming more frequent.
Jaikaan: At one time female obedience was seemingly universal. But it still hasn't gone away. "Domestic discipline" and related sites seem to be becoming more frequent.
Jaikaan: At one time female obedience was seemingly universal. But it still hasn't gone away. "Domestic discipline" and related sites seem to be becoming more frequent.
What do you think?
Obediance demands the disregard for one's own opinion. Regard for one's own opinion should never be surrendered.
Jaikaan: At one time female obedience was seemingly universal. But it still hasn't gone away. "Domestic discipline" and related sites seem to be becoming more frequent.
Jaikaan: At one time female obedience was seemingly universal. But it still hasn't gone away. "Domestic discipline" and related sites seem to be becoming more frequent.
What do you think?
I think that in the majority of relationships one party is dominant and one party is subservient, either can be male or female. Very few relationships are completely 50-50. I'm completely fine with both female obedience and male obedience as long as that obedience comes from a a place of respect for the other party's leadership and decision making skills.
I think that relationships where the dominant party uses manipulation, intimidation or threats to control the subservient party are dysfunctional. The dominant party in a relationship like this will rarely come to the realization that good leadership is about making decisions which benefit everyone involved not just themselves and that as a leader if something goes wrong it's there responsibility.
jac379pontyclun, South Glamorgan, Wales UK12,293 posts
dateadave: I think that in the majority of relationships one party is dominant and one party is subservient, either can be male or female. Very few relationships are completely 50-50. I'm completely fine with both female obedience and male obedience as long as that obedience comes from a a place of respect for the other party's leadership and decision making skills.
I think that relationships where the dominant party uses manipulation, intimidation or threats to control the subservient party are dysfunctional. The dominant party in a relationship like this will rarely come to the realization that good leadership is about making decisions which benefit everyone involved not just themselves and that as a leader if something goes wrong it's there responsibility.
How about each person having the leadership, or dominant role in different circumstances at different times?
Why does it have to be that one, or the other is always in one power position, or another?
lifeisadreamMexi Go, Mexico State Mexico16,713 posts
Jaikaan: At one time female obedience was seemingly universal. But it still hasn't gone away. "Domestic discipline" and related sites seem to be becoming more frequent.
What do you think?
When women were/are economically dependent of men, yes they could be “obedient” or pretend they were/are but now that women are bread makers as well, men have to be the obedient ones!
"The dominant party in a relationship like this will rarely come to the realization that good leadership is about making decisions which benefit everyone involved not just themselves and that as a leader if something goes wrong it's there responsibility."
That's a good point. Responsible leadership is hard work. One is no longer just looking out for oneself. In fact others have to be put first oftentimes.
jac379: How about each person having the leadership, or dominant role in different circumstances at different times?
Why does it have to be that one, or the other is always in one power position, or another?
Well said Jac, we all have our strengths and weaknesses. To share them equally with each other can only make you stronger with your relationship as a couple.
Jaikaan: At one time female obedience was seemingly universal. But it still hasn't gone away. "Domestic discipline" and related sites seem to be becoming more frequent.
What do you think?
I think you're out of your freakin mind if you are in favor of it.
lifeisadreamMexi Go, Mexico State Mexico16,713 posts
2intrigued: Like I posted earlier....asinine
Hi 2I
I do not take this type of threads seriously.
Usually the guy (s) whom does post this type of subjects are the ones whom might not even be the one in the picture, they will disappear very soon or have not history –CS forums- at all.
You are right Kid, it has been around for a long time. Some people do find this lifestyle very fulfilling. Like I said, It has to right for thr two people involved. I think most of the negative comments here are just posters opinions about it. That is what the forums are for. (To clarify anyones thoughts, no I do not condone this lifestyle)
Usually the guy (s) whom does post this type of subjects are the ones whom might not even be the one in the picture, they will disappear very soon or have not history –CS forums- at all.
You're right of course but the topic is here and just thinking about it makes my blood boil. Perhaps I'm not fully understanding all of what this obedience thing entails but it doesn't appeal to me whatever it is.
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
Female Obedience(Vote Below)
What do you think?