1. How many members think Robin Windsor and Deborah Meaden should NOT have even been in the dance off and their dismissal was unfair.
2. How many think that as Dave Myers has A) Made no effort to improve his dancing ability since week 1 and B) Done nothing except play the idiot to the public gallery C) He should not even be there but should have gone instead of Vanessa Feltz
3. The studio audience should decide who goes, on Dancing ability and points ranking rather than the TV audience vote.
leisure07: think its curtains for the hairy biker tonight
That would have been RIGHT - they got 4 last night and were the leowst score - Abby and Rachael were in the dance off by public vote and Myers is still in !!
But I have thought since they went to it that the whole public vote is a f.....g stitch up when it is so clear that they deliberately vote for the wrong people and haven't got a clue about what the main points re quality and presentation are for any dance let along be a jury.
None of the 4 judges thought either pair should have been in the dance off but were in a dilemma and you could see by her face that Darcey Bussel, the most qualified technical Judge IMO was utterly disgusted at having to make the choice between the two couples selected. - They came down in favour of Abby, staying which was right but by no means just.
IMO the judges tonight especially after disagreeing with last weeks fiasco would have had the whole studio audience's backing if they had refused to accept the public vote (Abby and Alijaz 10) (Rachel & Pasha 7) - Neither couple selected for the dance off had the lowest vote by a long way. (Mark & Ivetta 5) (Dave & Karen 4) and made them dance off instead and kicked Myers off.
HIM_666: That would have been RIGHT - they got 4 last night and were the leowst score - Abby and Rachael were in the dance off by public vote and Myers is still in !!
But I have thought since they went to it that the whole public vote is a f.....g stitch up when it is so clear that they deliberately vote for the wrong people and haven't got a clue about what the main points re quality and presentation are for any dance let along be a jury.
None of the 4 judges thought either pair should have been in the dance off but were in a dilemma and you could see by her face that Darcey Bussel, the most qualified technical Judge IMO was utterly disgusted at having to make the choice between the two couples selected. - They came down in favour of Abby, staying which was right but by no means just.
IMO the judges tonight especially after disagreeing with last weeks fiasco would have had the whole studio audience's backing if they had refused to accept the public vote (Abby and Alijaz 10) (Rachel & Pasha 7) - Neither couple selected for the dance off had the lowest vote by a long way. (Mark & Ivetta 5) (Dave & Karen 4) and made them dance off instead and kicked Myers off.
Glitch101: You only have to look at past history to see that the idiots are always kept in. Supposedly makes for good viewing ratings,but personally I think they've pushed the boundaries too far this time.Wonder who decides the line up. Need to change him or her.
1. As long as it is the low IQ morons among the public who decide by multiple votintg in families with mobiles there can be no fairness.
2. IMO It would be better if, as the fact one has a Landline rather than a mobile is a major factor with ones credit rating for mortgages and loans etc, the SCD vote should be recorded and on the basis of one family one vote confined to Landlines only
3. The only way to change it, is by a massive protest petition from intelligent viewers direct to the BBC saying the studio audience should decide and then contestants will have a more fair chance of it being based on quality and presentation of the dancing and the votes of the judges.
Glitch101London, Greater London, England UK1,079 posts
HIM_666: 1. As long as it is the low IQ morons among the public who decide by multiple votintg in families with mobiles there can be no fairness.
2. IMO It would be better if, as the fact one has a Landline rather than a mobile is a major factor with ones credit rating for mortgages and loans etc, the SCD vote should be recorded and on the basis of one family one vote confined to Landlines only
3. The only way to change it, is by a massive protest petition from intelligent viewers direct to the BBC saying the studio audience should decide and then contestants will have a more fair chance of it being based on quality and presentation of the dancing and the votes of the judges.
I was actually referring to the selection of dancers.
They select Natalie Gumede who has trained as a dancer.Years of training has given her a definite edge and an unfair advantage over the older ladies.
I hate the hairy bikers generally but to have to look at the worst half every Saturday is a travesty,especially when he's kept in above two good dancers.
Glitch101: I was actually referring to the selection of dancers.
They select Natalie Gumede who has trained as a dancer.Years of training has given her a definite edge and an unfair advantage over the older ladies.
I hate the hairy bikers generally but to have to look at the worst half every Saturday is a travesty,especially when he's kept in above two good dancers.
Tomcats2: Sorry HIM but the whole programme is a waste of money it should get the chop
Good Idea TC But Do you realise ? The reason they dish pout crap on saturday nights is because the Tax payer supported BBC haven't got anyone now for a Saturday night who can or is allowed to write anything to match *Till death do us Part* *Yes Minister* *Yes Prime Minister* *To the Manor born* or IMO the best *Allo Allo* and gisv us all a laugh.
So we could end up with their take on *X factor*, *Big Brother* or other sub-culture moronic reality TV garbage more boring than watching paint dry
Glitch101London, Greater London, England UK1,079 posts
HIM_666: Good Idea TC But Do you realise ? The reason they dish pout crap on saturday nights is because the Tax payer supported BBC haven't got anyone now for a Saturday night who can or is allowed to write anything to match *Till death do us Part* *Yes Minister* *Yes Prime Minister* *To the Manor born* or IMO the best *Allo Allo* and gisv us all a laugh.
So we could end up with their take on *X factor*, *Big Brother* or other sub-culture moronic reality TV garbage more boring than watching paint dry
Well you obviously like it,or you wouldn't have started this Poll.
natalie might as well have a bye all the way to the final there is no way the biker can surive tonight unless its rigged and mark goes[/quote]
I agree with that but being fair I think Abby and Natalie both have a good chance of the final.
However - Mark & Myers should have been out already but being objective all the celebs who have been improving deserve Fairer treatment instead of such obviously biased Fixing witnessed thus far.
HIM_666: natalie might as well have a bye all the way to the final there is no way the biker can surive tonight unless its rigged and mark goes
I agree with that but being fair I think Abby and Natalie both have a good chance of the final.
However - Mark & Myers should have been out already but being objective all the celebs who have been improving deserve Fairer treatment instead of such obviously biased Fixing witnessed thus far.
some cracking dances tonight but it will be fiona and mark in the dance off on sunday im a tellin you
leisure07: some cracking dances tonight but it will be fiona and mark in the dance off on sunday im a tellin you
Yep - That would be fair IF the morons vote that way, but who knows ? - As they did the traditional Paso Doblé and got 39/40 last night - well desrved - it should have been 40 the puss heads could pick Susanna & Kevin which would be a F...in travesty.
BTW - What I would love to see is someone break ramks and give revell Horwood a bloody good hiding LIVE as his nastiness and down marking of peoplem who are obviuously giving all and trying ther hardest,is so obvious.
I have always been a fan of Darcey Bussel because she was not only a prima ballerina, she also did some cabaret dance work and as an ex pro drummer I can tell you, her comments are always positive and her face said it all last night !!
Seems you all been watching programme and saying its rigged etc. Of course the non dancer come on they have done well in my opinion for age etc and never danced before. It has always been that way and that has kept the viewers you all included. Now the serious stuff starts with the real good dancers. I missed this programme for a couple years and just watched this one because of my biker friend. He always knew he would go but has done well so far. Been a laugh anyway
Redex: Seems you all been watching programme and saying its rigged etc. Of course the non dancer come on they have done well in my opinion for age etc and never danced before. It has always been that way and that has kept the viewers you all included. Now the serious stuff starts with the real good dancers. I missed this programme for a couple years and just watched this one because of my biker friend. He always knew he would go but has done well so far. Been a laugh anyway
leisure07: so predictable so predictable and next week it will be mark and my guess big ben
I haven't got much room for the show anymore. Like you say C it is so predictable keeping the duffers each week. I reckon that if it is between Mark and Ben it will be Ben OUT even though IMO it should be Mark.
Sailfree1Vilters-Wangs, St Gallen Switzerland663 posts
HIM_666: I haven't got much room for the show anymore. Like you say C it is so predictable keeping the duffers each week. I reckon that if it is between Mark and Ben it will be Ben OUT even though IMO it should be Mark.
I am just adding to the thread. No clue of this prog and who or what. Never seen it and by the sounds of it not missing out on much.
Nov 28, 2013 1:39 AM CST STRICTLY 013 - Who should have got the chop on OCTOBER 27th ?
sassienolonger2life's like that....!!!, Queensland Australia14 Threads395 Posts
sassienolonger2life's like that....!!!, Queensland Australia395 posts
leisure07: hiya reds
Couldn't believe it when Tina Arena and her partner came third in outside votes, yet they scored the highest points from the Judges... Goes to show you, people are very fickle when voting on anything
take for instance how the uk never seem to get into the top 10 in the eurovision - even when you had Andrew Lloyd Weber performing...
leisure07: getting down to the nitty gritty now there is no way mark can survive this week
IF he does not get the boot and we see his scores on Saturday, we will know for sure on Sunday and inally confirm what many people I have spoken to think.
Someone HIGH in the BBC Brass hats Lodge has authorised paying back handers to one or more in the right position to rig the voting and keep shtum.
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
STRICTLY 013 - Who should have got the chop on OCTOBER 27th ?(Vote Below)
1. How many members think Robin Windsor and Deborah Meaden should NOT have even been in the dance off and their dismissal was unfair.
2. How many think that as Dave Myers has
A) Made no effort to improve his dancing ability since week 1 and
B) Done nothing except play the idiot to the public gallery
C) He should not even be there but should have gone instead of Vanessa Feltz
3. The studio audience should decide who goes, on Dancing ability and points ranking rather than the TV audience vote.