Is it true The Big Bang Theory was proven ? (46)
yes so far.but they ready to disprove it any moment in the future
------ This poll is Archived ------
The only evidence that backs the Big Bang theory, is that the universe is expanding outwards in all directions and is in fact gaining speed. Drop a pebble in a pond and the ripple effect occurs. No one saw the pebble being dropped in space, thus, the theory: Something happened at one point in space, to bring about the universe.
------ This poll is Archived ------
CuddlingSoul: The only evidence that backs the Big Bang theory, is that the universe is expanding outwards in all directions and is in fact gaining speed. Drop a pebble in a pond and the ripple effect occurs. No one saw the pebble being dropped in space, thus, the theory: Something happened at one point in space, to bring about the universe.
plus the background radiation out there, which is evidence of a huge, massive humongous (big) nuclear explosion..ie "big bang"...what a whopper it must have been.------ This poll is Archived ------
MrRick77: Is it true The Big Bang Theory was proven ?
For $twelve-ninetynine I'll prove anything. 
------ This poll is Archived ------
MrRick77: Is it true The Big Bang Theory was proven ?
Does that mean that Sana want be coming this year???...
------ This poll is Archived ------
Dedovix: Does that mean that Sana won`t be coming this year???...
I made a boo-boo
------ This poll is Archived ------
The Big Bang theory is the prevailing cosmological model for the early development of the universe.
The key idea is that the universe is expanding. Consequently, the universe was denser and hotter in the past. In particular, the Big Bang model suggests that at some moment all matter in the universe was contained in a single point, which is considered the beginning of the universe. Modern measurements place this moment at approximately 13.82 billion years ago, which is thus considered the age of the universe. After the initial expansion, the universe cooled sufficiently to allow the formation of subatomic particles, including protons, neutrons, and electrons.
Though simple atomic nuclei formed within the first three minutes after the Big Bang, thousands of years passed before the first electrically neutral atoms formed. The majority of atoms that were produced by the Big Bang are hydrogen, along with helium and traces of lithium.
Giant clouds of these primordial elements later coalesced through gravity to form stars and galaxies, and the heavier elements were synthesized either within stars or during supernovae.
The key idea is that the universe is expanding. Consequently, the universe was denser and hotter in the past. In particular, the Big Bang model suggests that at some moment all matter in the universe was contained in a single point, which is considered the beginning of the universe. Modern measurements place this moment at approximately 13.82 billion years ago, which is thus considered the age of the universe. After the initial expansion, the universe cooled sufficiently to allow the formation of subatomic particles, including protons, neutrons, and electrons.
Though simple atomic nuclei formed within the first three minutes after the Big Bang, thousands of years passed before the first electrically neutral atoms formed. The majority of atoms that were produced by the Big Bang are hydrogen, along with helium and traces of lithium.
Giant clouds of these primordial elements later coalesced through gravity to form stars and galaxies, and the heavier elements were synthesized either within stars or during supernovae.
------ This poll is Archived ------
CuddlingSoul: The only evidence that backs the Big Bang theory, is that the universe is expanding outwards in all directions and is in fact gaining speed. Drop a pebble in a pond and the ripple effect occurs. No one saw the pebble being dropped in space, thus, the theory: Something happened at one point in space, to bring about the universe.
only thing that they are dealing with is the black holes under this theory.------ This poll is Archived ------
You cant beat a big bang 
------ This poll is Archived ------
Wait to hear the echo.
------ This poll is Archived ------
MrRick77: Is it true The Big Bang Theory was proven ?
Yes was proven, and its coming to get us while we sleeping
------ This poll is Archived ------
That's not how science works. Nothing is ever settled in science. When someone tells you that this or that is a fact or that the debate is settled on some issue, they are talking politics, not science. It's always a theory, never a fact. "The debate" is never over.
The big bang theory is currently the best available theory to explain the current body of observations. It is very strongly supported by solid evidence and new evidence has given it very strong support. It will be the prevailing theory until one that better fits the current evidence comes along.
The big bang theory is currently the best available theory to explain the current body of observations. It is very strongly supported by solid evidence and new evidence has given it very strong support. It will be the prevailing theory until one that better fits the current evidence comes along.
------ This poll is Archived ------
the big bang their is real it is happening in other solar systems right now. you can see it happening with long range telascops. I still believe god made the matter for the big bang to happen so he still had something to say abought it lollol
------ This poll is Archived ------
been proven long ago,even Ralph Kramden would go:"Bang,Zoom,to the Moon"!
------ This poll is Archived ------
JeanKimberley: The Big Bang theory is the prevailing cosmological model for the early development of the universe.
The key idea is that the universe is expanding. Consequently, the universe was denser and hotter in the past. In particular, the Big Bang model suggests that at some moment all matter in the universe was contained in a single point, which is considered the beginning of the universe. Modern measurements place this moment at approximately 13.82 billion years ago, which is thus considered the age of the universe. After the initial expansion, the universe cooled sufficiently to allow the formation of subatomic particles, including protons, neutrons, and electrons.
Though simple atomic nuclei formed within the first three minutes after the Big Bang, thousands of years passed before the first electrically neutral atoms formed. The majority of atoms that were produced by the Big Bang are hydrogen, along with helium and traces of lithium.
Giant clouds of these primordial elements later coalesced through gravity to form stars and galaxies, and the heavier elements were synthesized either within stars or during supernovae.
The key idea is that the universe is expanding. Consequently, the universe was denser and hotter in the past. In particular, the Big Bang model suggests that at some moment all matter in the universe was contained in a single point, which is considered the beginning of the universe. Modern measurements place this moment at approximately 13.82 billion years ago, which is thus considered the age of the universe. After the initial expansion, the universe cooled sufficiently to allow the formation of subatomic particles, including protons, neutrons, and electrons.
Though simple atomic nuclei formed within the first three minutes after the Big Bang, thousands of years passed before the first electrically neutral atoms formed. The majority of atoms that were produced by the Big Bang are hydrogen, along with helium and traces of lithium.
Giant clouds of these primordial elements later coalesced through gravity to form stars and galaxies, and the heavier elements were synthesized either within stars or during supernovae.
The universe has no beginning neither no end. Its outside the frame of time and its impossible to give a birthday to it . We are yet to know about the dark energy and and mass which is suppose to be the major forces in the universe. All the laws of Physics as we know breaks down in extremes like in black holes and another sets of laws take over , so the "minuscule universe" which banged into the universe we know surely had a very different sets of rules and cannot be examined by our physics or mathematics .
------ This poll is Archived ------
MrRick77: Is it true The Big Bang Theory was proven?
Just how would one go about proving it ?????
------ This poll is Archived ------
JeanKimberley: The Big Bang theory is the prevailing cosmological model for the early development of the universe.
The key idea is that the universe is expanding. Consequently, the universe was denser and hotter in the past. In particular, the Big Bang model suggests that at some moment all matter in the universe was contained in a single point, which is considered the beginning of the universe. Modern measurements place this moment at approximately 13.82 billion years ago, which is thus considered the age of the universe. After the initial expansion, the universe cooled sufficiently to allow the formation of subatomic particles, including protons, neutrons, and electrons.
Though simple atomic nuclei formed within the first three minutes after the Big Bang, thousands of years passed before the first electrically neutral atoms formed. The majority of atoms that were produced by the Big Bang are hydrogen, along with helium and traces of lithium.
Giant clouds of these primordial elements later coalesced through gravity to form stars and galaxies, and the heavier elements were synthesized either within stars or during supernovae.
The key idea is that the universe is expanding. Consequently, the universe was denser and hotter in the past. In particular, the Big Bang model suggests that at some moment all matter in the universe was contained in a single point, which is considered the beginning of the universe. Modern measurements place this moment at approximately 13.82 billion years ago, which is thus considered the age of the universe. After the initial expansion, the universe cooled sufficiently to allow the formation of subatomic particles, including protons, neutrons, and electrons.
Though simple atomic nuclei formed within the first three minutes after the Big Bang, thousands of years passed before the first electrically neutral atoms formed. The majority of atoms that were produced by the Big Bang are hydrogen, along with helium and traces of lithium.
Giant clouds of these primordial elements later coalesced through gravity to form stars and galaxies, and the heavier elements were synthesized either within stars or during supernovae.
------ This poll is Archived ------
------ This poll is Archived ------
YosemiteMike: That's not how science works. Nothing is ever settled in science. When someone tells you that this or that is a fact or that the debate is settled on some issue, they are talking politics, not science. It's always a theory, never a fact. "The debate" is never over.
The big bang theory is currently the best available theory to explain the current body of observations. It is very strongly supported by solid evidence and new evidence has given it very strong support. It will be the prevailing theory until one that better fits the current evidence comes along.
The big bang theory is currently the best available theory to explain the current body of observations. It is very strongly supported by solid evidence and new evidence has given it very strong support. It will be the prevailing theory until one that better fits the current evidence comes along.
------ This poll is Archived ------
if everything is expanding outward according to the big bang how come the milky way and Andromeda are on a collision course shouldn't they be moving apart
------ This poll is Archived ------
johnwilliam59: if everything is expanding outward according to the big bang how come the milky way and Andromeda are on a collision course shouldn't they be moving apart
interesting...------ This poll is Archived ------
johnwilliam59: if everything is expanding outward according to the big bang how come the milky way and Andromeda are on a collision course shouldn't they be moving apart
The Andromeda–Milky Way collision is a galaxy collision predicted to occur in about 4 billion years between the two largest galaxies in the Local Group—the Milky Way (which contains our Solar System and Earth) and the Andromeda Galaxy although the stars involved are sufficiently far apart that it is improbable that many of them will individually collide.
n 2012, researchers came to the conclusion that the collision is definite after using the Hubble Space Telescope between 2002 and 2010 to track the motion of Andromeda. Andromeda's tangential or side-ways velocity with respect to the Milky Way was found to be relatively much smaller than the approaching velocity and therefore we expect it to directly collide with the Milky Way in about 4 billion years.
Such collisions are relatively common. Andromeda, for example, is believed to have collided with at least one other galaxy in the past, and several dwarf galaxies such as SagDEG are currently colliding with the Milky Way and being merged into it.
so,it really doesn't disprove the BB-Theory!
Be quite a Spectacle to watch!
------ This poll is Archived ------
Conrad73: The Andromeda–Milky Way collision is a galaxy collision predicted to occur in about 4 billion years between the two largest galaxies in the Local Group—the Milky Way (which contains our Solar System and Earth) and the Andromeda Galaxy although the stars involved are sufficiently far apart that it is improbable that many of them will individually collide.
n 2012, researchers came to the conclusion that the collision is definite after using the Hubble Space Telescope between 2002 and 2010 to track the motion of Andromeda. Andromeda's tangential or side-ways velocity with respect to the Milky Way was found to be relatively much smaller than the approaching velocity and therefore we expect it to directly collide with the Milky Way in about 4 billion years.
Such collisions are relatively common. Andromeda, for example, is believed to have collided with at least one other galaxy in the past, and several dwarf galaxies such as SagDEG are currently colliding with the Milky Way and being merged into it.
so,it really doesn't disprove the BB-Theory!
Be quite a Spectacle to watch!
it won't matter, the earth will be dead in one billion years...n 2012, researchers came to the conclusion that the collision is definite after using the Hubble Space Telescope between 2002 and 2010 to track the motion of Andromeda. Andromeda's tangential or side-ways velocity with respect to the Milky Way was found to be relatively much smaller than the approaching velocity and therefore we expect it to directly collide with the Milky Way in about 4 billion years.
Such collisions are relatively common. Andromeda, for example, is believed to have collided with at least one other galaxy in the past, and several dwarf galaxies such as SagDEG are currently colliding with the Milky Way and being merged into it.
so,it really doesn't disprove the BB-Theory!
Be quite a Spectacle to watch!
------ This poll is Archived ------
Of course it was proven. I proved it and wrote the book "in the beginning of the beginning, the exsistance of God".
------ This poll is Archived ------
MrRick77: Is it true The Big Bang Theory was proven ?
Theories about what we call reality are never proven. It is just that some of their basic assumptions in order to build a theory are confirmed directly or mostly undirected. In the case of the BB theory, it is based on so many bizarre assumptions (almost like religious conceptions) decorated with math equations that I do not think it will be ever confirmed but simply maintained as an article of mainstream faith.
------ This poll is Archived ------
Conrad73: The Andromeda–Milky Way collision is a galaxy collision predicted to occur in about 4 billion years between the two largest galaxies in the Local Group—the Milky Way (which contains our Solar System and Earth) and the Andromeda Galaxy although the stars involved are sufficiently far apart that it is improbable that many of them will individually collide.
n 2012, researchers came to the conclusion that the collision is definite after using the Hubble Space Telescope between 2002 and 2010 to track the motion of Andromeda. Andromeda's tangential or side-ways velocity with respect to the Milky Way was found to be relatively much smaller than the approaching velocity and therefore we expect it to directly collide with the Milky Way in about 4 billion years.
Such collisions are relatively common. Andromeda, for example, is believed to have collided with at least one other galaxy in the past, and several dwarf galaxies such as SagDEG are currently colliding with the Milky Way and being merged into it.
so,it really doesn't disprove the BB-Theory!
Be quite a Spectacle to watch!
n 2012, researchers came to the conclusion that the collision is definite after using the Hubble Space Telescope between 2002 and 2010 to track the motion of Andromeda. Andromeda's tangential or side-ways velocity with respect to the Milky Way was found to be relatively much smaller than the approaching velocity and therefore we expect it to directly collide with the Milky Way in about 4 billion years.
Such collisions are relatively common. Andromeda, for example, is believed to have collided with at least one other galaxy in the past, and several dwarf galaxies such as SagDEG are currently colliding with the Milky Way and being merged into it.
so,it really doesn't disprove the BB-Theory!
Be quite a Spectacle to watch!
It does not disprove , it does not prove. BB is really an article of scientific gibberish not even supported by any grotesque field equation used in Physics. It just shows how the so called modern world is still pinned down by religion in so many ways, particularly science and modern religon called STATE.
------ This poll is Archived ------
JeanKimberley: The Big Bang theory is the prevailing cosmological model for the early development of the universe.
The key idea is that the universe is expanding. Consequently, the universe was denser and hotter in the past. In particular, the Big Bang model suggests that at some moment all matter in the universe was contained in a single point, which is considered the beginning of the universe. Modern measurements place this moment at approximately 13.82 billion years ago, which is thus considered the age of the universe. After the initial expansion, the universe cooled sufficiently to allow the formation of subatomic particles, including protons, neutrons, and electrons.
Though simple atomic nuclei formed within the first three minutes after the Big Bang, thousands of years passed before the first electrically neutral atoms formed. The majority of atoms that were produced by the Big Bang are hydrogen, along with helium and traces of lithium.
Giant clouds of these primordial elements later coalesced through gravity to form stars and galaxies, and the heavier elements were synthesized either within stars or during supernovae.
I saw you there too. I was standing nearer to the fence.The key idea is that the universe is expanding. Consequently, the universe was denser and hotter in the past. In particular, the Big Bang model suggests that at some moment all matter in the universe was contained in a single point, which is considered the beginning of the universe. Modern measurements place this moment at approximately 13.82 billion years ago, which is thus considered the age of the universe. After the initial expansion, the universe cooled sufficiently to allow the formation of subatomic particles, including protons, neutrons, and electrons.
Though simple atomic nuclei formed within the first three minutes after the Big Bang, thousands of years passed before the first electrically neutral atoms formed. The majority of atoms that were produced by the Big Bang are hydrogen, along with helium and traces of lithium.
Giant clouds of these primordial elements later coalesced through gravity to form stars and galaxies, and the heavier elements were synthesized either within stars or during supernovae.
------ This poll is Archived ------
Stop picking on Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson.
------ This poll is Archived ------
Antjo39: It does not disprove , it does not prove. BB is really an article of scientific gibberish not even supported by any grotesque field equation used in Physics. It just shows how the so called modern world is still pinned down by religion in so many ways, particularly science and modern religon called STATE.
why don't you enlighten us to the Real Reality then?
------ This poll is Archived ------
In deed, I as a christian share the opinion that the BB is true but not with the jibberish talk of how it occur nor the time. The Bible tells me and i believe that God said let there be light and BANG.........The sun was not created till the fourth day. To believe that all that exists (Matter and design) came from none existency because the nothingness decide to explode, calls for a divine intervention that no psychiatrist not psychologist can beginn to help. That takes more faith than any religion.
------ This poll is Archived ------
This Poll is Archived
This Poll is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Poll get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
More Threads
Kultur-multur
The weird and the random facts around the world
Say Anything Again
See It All The Time
Trump on Trial
Trump Elementary
Democrats destroyed America
If Our Profiles Were Truly Honest
I'm a 53 YEAR'S YUNG MAN that lives back in the 80s
biggest lie
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
Stats for this Poll
46 Votes
2,326 Views
46 Comments
Created: May 2014
Last Viewed: Apr 14
Last Commented: Jul 2014
Last Voted: Sep 2019
0 Likes
Is it true The Big Bang Theory was proven ?(Vote Below)