A couple; who are aged above 40 years, belong to a medium income as sufficient to lead an average standard of life without any luxury, from any religion or country, expecting their first child..
But the unborn diagnosed with a deadly incurable disease.. By which that child will never be able to take care on own and will have to live a painful life with expensive treatment and other human's support for lifelong.. Even after being adult..
But there is an option of Abortion..
But as per age the couple is running out of chances to having another child again.. And also there is the question of killing an unborn right or wrong..
So Considering all consequences what should the couple do?
They need to let that baby live! There are no circumstances in this lifetime that should come before your child! How about being reasponsible enough to take measures to not get preganant instead of getting abortions at 40.. thats just to darn old for Ooops !
Jada_Bella: They need to let that baby live! There are no circumstances in this lifetime that should come before your child! How about being reasponsible enough to take measures to not get preganant instead of getting abortions at 40.. thats just to darn old for Ooops !
Obviously at the age of 40 couple would have try to get a healthy normal child instead of taking measures to not get pregnant..
And also the childs comfort and safety and quality of living should and must come to first and above all to the parents..
So when the parents know that if they give birth to that child then the child will suffer treamandously throughout whole life and there is no gueranty that the parents will live always till that child won't die then who will assure to take care of that child whole life! Specially when that child will always be depandant on others to live..
KILLING AN UNBORN CHILD IS DEFINITELY WRONG..
BUT GIVING BIRTH TO A CHILD TO LIVE A PAINFUL AND MISSERABLE LIFE ; KNOWIGLY; EVEN WHEN THERE WAS AN OPTION TO ABBORT , IS MORE WRONG AND IRRESPONSIBLE AND SELFISH FOR THE PARENTS..
The point here is not about that the couple don't want a child.. The point is that if the couple give birth to that child , the child will suffer whole life.. And by abbortion the couple can at least give this unfortunate unborn child a relief from living a painful life..
The question here.. Is it a killing! Or Is it mercy killing! (More like saving someone from agony)
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
What should they do(Vote Below)
But the unborn diagnosed with a deadly incurable disease..
By which that child will never be able to take care on own and will have to live a painful life with expensive treatment and other human's support for lifelong.. Even after being adult..
But there is an option of Abortion..
But as per age the couple is running out of chances to having another child again..
And also there is the question of killing an unborn right or wrong..
So
Considering all consequences what should the couple do?