Jim acosta - guilty or not guilty of putting his hands on a woman (113)
How do you know acosta is a guy? 
------ This poll is Archived ------
LeeCharming: "GUILTY"...It is as plain as day, even the blind seen it!!
------ This poll is Archived ------
galrads: How do you know acosta is a guy?
Do u think/she is guilty------ This poll is Archived ------
galrads: You know you're right...
------ This poll is Archived ------
lookn2share: LeeCharming: "GUILTY"...It is as plain as day, even the blind seen it!!
Why did he deny it? Should the woman speak out about it and tell her story of the oppressive patriarchal misogynist, who prevent her from doing her job and putting his grubby hands on her?------ This poll is Archived ------
LeeCharming: Do u think/she is guilty
Chop.. ?... I thought he shoved her away aggressively. Acosta is brain dead and probably would have tried the same thing if it was chuck norris or rosie Grier, or hoss cartwright or mongo ... heck yes he/she is guilty....------ This poll is Archived ------
Put it this way Lee. In the US, if you did what he did to your wife during an argument, you would be arrested for domestic violence.
Should someone be arrested for doing what he did. Absolutely not. But it does remind me of some video at some type of town hall meeting, where there were a couple of women who disliked each other at the meeting, and when one of them finished speaking at the podium was walking to her seat, and as she walked past another women who she disliked, she took the papers she had in her and patted her on the back of the head, and then the women she patted cried out and fell out of her seat on to the floor. It was obvious she was faking. Never the less the paper patter was prosecuted, sued and and had to pay the other woman some money for her faked injuries.
Just another fine example of the stupidity that ties up our court system.
Should someone be arrested for doing what he did. Absolutely not. But it does remind me of some video at some type of town hall meeting, where there were a couple of women who disliked each other at the meeting, and when one of them finished speaking at the podium was walking to her seat, and as she walked past another women who she disliked, she took the papers she had in her and patted her on the back of the head, and then the women she patted cried out and fell out of her seat on to the floor. It was obvious she was faking. Never the less the paper patter was prosecuted, sued and and had to pay the other woman some money for her faked injuries.
Just another fine example of the stupidity that ties up our court system.
------ This poll is Archived ------
LeeCharming: Because he can get away with it, the 'left' lie without shame! Yes she should and probably will eventually.
------ This poll is Archived ------
galrads: Chop.. ?... I thought he shoved her away aggressively. Acosta is brain dead and probably would have tried the same thing if it was chuck norris or rosie Grier, or hoss cartwright or mongo ... heck yes he/she is guilty....
------ This poll is Archived ------
Here you go.
------ This poll is Archived ------
Don't forget to vote people
------ This poll is Archived ------
Bearwoman: Here you go.
do you think he is guilty of touching the woman?------ This poll is Archived ------
LeeCharming: do you think he is guilty of touching the woman?
I saw the woman attempt to take the microphone away from Jim ACosta but didn't really see him touch her.
------ This poll is Archived ------
Bearwoman: I saw the woman attempt to take the microphone away from Jim ACosta but didn't really see him touch her.
Thats becasuse the Whirte house doctored the video to both make out that Accosta hit the womans elbow AND that Accosta stat down immediatly when Trump moved away from the Mic to try and make Accosta look like he was scared of mighty Trump. The basically sped up the moment that Accosta was struggling to hold onto the mic to make out that he hit her elbow rather than just move his hand down in surprisePeople who first saw the footage knew that Acosta was in the right, but all the right wingers want to see is the doctored video.
The Verge had a look and heres what they had to say. The whole point of this is to divide people and makke them doubt the evidence of their eyes.
Many outlets reported that the videos had been doctored, and how, including The Washington Post and Fast Company. Something was certainly different, but with all the speculation, it was difficult to understand exactly what made them different. So I got in touch with a friend of mine, video producer Jamison Hermann, to get a better grip on it.
At first glance, he says that “they sped up the clip to emphasize the motion.” The video speeds up when Acosta’s hand makes contact with the intern’s arm. “You can see the hand raised in the background moves more quickly, her face turns more quickly, and the guy on the left drops his mic down to waist level more quickly,” he explains. Overlaying the two videos in the same frame, he says, is the best way to demonstrate exactly how it differs: the press secretary’s video clearly speeds up at the moment Acosta’s hand touches the intern’s arm.
Video comparison, courtesy of Jamison Hermann (@jhermann)
<I cant cpy the video link, watch at the link above>
“This is not just frame blending, which would happen if you transcoded from different frame rates,” Hermann says. “It’s a sloppily-done speed change on the footage itself.”
The Verge’s design director William Joel agrees. “I can’t say for a certainty that Infowars sped up or slowed down their footage, but it is suspect that when the two clips are overlaid, the only time we see a discrepancy is during the moment in question,” he says. “If this was truly a result of ghosting or some frame rate difference from varying source materials, you would expect to see the same ghosting over the entire clip, not just during one specific moment.”
While the video the government shared does, indeed, appear to be doctored, given this administration’s track record with lying without the use of visual aids, it didn’t really need to be. The real problem here is how Sanders and the president boldly lied to the public — and everyone in the room last night — to bar a reporter they didn’t like from questioning them directly. It was raw power exercised in the service of expanding their control.
The video Sanders shared was a lie, and had Infowars and Sanders made the same allegations against Acosta using the exact same clip C-SPAN and NBC did, their supporters would likely still have believed the government’s claims. President Trump has proved to be virtually unable to give a speech without getting in at least a few falsehoods about his enemies or about his achievements, but what’s stunning in this incident is how far Sanders is willing to stretch a lie on the president’s behalf. The technical details of the video, whether it was doctored or not, were a pretext for Trump’s continued attacks on the press.
------ This poll is Archived ------
Hi Sir_T Thank You but I had heard about the messing with the actual video.
------ This poll is Archived ------
Sir_T: Thats becasuse the Whirte house doctored the video to both make out that Accosta hit the womans elbow AND that Accosta stat down immediatly when Trump moved away from the Mic to try and make Accosta look like he was scared of mighty Trump. The basically sped up the moment that Accosta was struggling to hold onto the mic to make out that he hit her elbow rather than just move his hand down in surprise
People who first saw the footage knew that Acosta was in the right, but all the right wingers want to see is the doctored video.
The Verge had a look and heres what they had to say. The whole point of this is to divide people and makke them doubt the evidence of their eyes.
Many outlets reported that the videos had been doctored, and how, including The Washington Post and Fast Company. Something was certainly different, but with all the speculation, it was difficult to understand exactly what made them different. So I got in touch with a friend of mine, video producer Jamison Hermann, to get a better grip on it.
At first glance, he says that “they sped up the clip to emphasize the motion.” The video speeds up when Acosta’s hand makes contact with the intern’s arm. “You can see the hand raised in the background moves more quickly, her face turns more quickly, and the guy on the left drops his mic down to waist level more quickly,” he explains. Overlaying the two videos in the same frame, he says, is the best way to demonstrate exactly how it differs: the press secretary’s video clearly speeds up at the moment Acosta’s hand touches the intern’s arm.
Video comparison, courtesy of Jamison Hermann (@jhermann)
<I cant cpy the video link, watch at the link above>
“This is not just frame blending, which would happen if you transcoded from different frame rates,” Hermann says. “It’s a sloppily-done speed change on the footage itself.”
The Verge’s design director William Joel agrees. “I can’t say for a certainty that Infowars sped up or slowed down their footage, but it is suspect that when the two clips are overlaid, the only time we see a discrepancy is during the moment in question,” he says. “If this was truly a result of ghosting or some frame rate difference from varying source materials, you would expect to see the same ghosting over the entire clip, not just during one specific moment.”
While the video the government shared does, indeed, appear to be doctored, given this administration’s track record with lying without the use of visual aids, it didn’t really need to be. The real problem here is how Sanders and the president boldly lied to the public — and everyone in the room last night — to bar a reporter they didn’t like from questioning them directly. It was raw power exercised in the service of expanding their control.
The video Sanders shared was a lie, and had Infowars and Sanders made the same allegations against Acosta using the exact same clip C-SPAN and NBC did, their supporters would likely still have believed the government’s claims. President Trump has proved to be virtually unable to give a speech without getting in at least a few falsehoods about his enemies or about his achievements, but what’s stunning in this incident is how far Sanders is willing to stretch a lie on the president’s behalf. The technical details of the video, whether it was doctored or not, were a pretext for Trump’s continued attacks on the press.
I watched the press conference and he did touch her not doubt about itPeople who first saw the footage knew that Acosta was in the right, but all the right wingers want to see is the doctored video.
The Verge had a look and heres what they had to say. The whole point of this is to divide people and makke them doubt the evidence of their eyes.
Many outlets reported that the videos had been doctored, and how, including The Washington Post and Fast Company. Something was certainly different, but with all the speculation, it was difficult to understand exactly what made them different. So I got in touch with a friend of mine, video producer Jamison Hermann, to get a better grip on it.
At first glance, he says that “they sped up the clip to emphasize the motion.” The video speeds up when Acosta’s hand makes contact with the intern’s arm. “You can see the hand raised in the background moves more quickly, her face turns more quickly, and the guy on the left drops his mic down to waist level more quickly,” he explains. Overlaying the two videos in the same frame, he says, is the best way to demonstrate exactly how it differs: the press secretary’s video clearly speeds up at the moment Acosta’s hand touches the intern’s arm.
Video comparison, courtesy of Jamison Hermann (@jhermann)
<I cant cpy the video link, watch at the link above>
“This is not just frame blending, which would happen if you transcoded from different frame rates,” Hermann says. “It’s a sloppily-done speed change on the footage itself.”
The Verge’s design director William Joel agrees. “I can’t say for a certainty that Infowars sped up or slowed down their footage, but it is suspect that when the two clips are overlaid, the only time we see a discrepancy is during the moment in question,” he says. “If this was truly a result of ghosting or some frame rate difference from varying source materials, you would expect to see the same ghosting over the entire clip, not just during one specific moment.”
While the video the government shared does, indeed, appear to be doctored, given this administration’s track record with lying without the use of visual aids, it didn’t really need to be. The real problem here is how Sanders and the president boldly lied to the public — and everyone in the room last night — to bar a reporter they didn’t like from questioning them directly. It was raw power exercised in the service of expanding their control.
The video Sanders shared was a lie, and had Infowars and Sanders made the same allegations against Acosta using the exact same clip C-SPAN and NBC did, their supporters would likely still have believed the government’s claims. President Trump has proved to be virtually unable to give a speech without getting in at least a few falsehoods about his enemies or about his achievements, but what’s stunning in this incident is how far Sanders is willing to stretch a lie on the president’s behalf. The technical details of the video, whether it was doctored or not, were a pretext for Trump’s continued attacks on the press.
------ This poll is Archived ------
Bearwoman: I saw the woman attempt to take the microphone away from Jim ACosta but didn't really see him touch her.
Here’s several versions on this webpage of the hostility acosta directed at the intern. The slowed down version kind of sums it up... imho ------ This poll is Archived ------
galrads: Here’s several versions on this webpage of the hostility acosta directed at the intern. The slowed down version kind of sums it up... imho
Thanks galards 
------ This poll is Archived ------
LeeCharming: I watched the press conference and he did touch her not doubt about it
Well ya, he touched her elbow with his little finger, after she had grabbed for the Microphone three times and Accosta was struggling to hold onto the mic. She touched him first. The "assault" would not have bruised a sparrow. It was not a Karate chop.Plus, other reporters stood up and supported Accosta.
*sigh* you are going to make me dig up the footage of that Republican candidate bodyslamming a reporter that Trump approved of, and that Guy on Trumps staff who shoved a female reporter out of the way during the campaign arent you? Oh whu cares, its not like you would admit your double standards anyway.
------ This poll is Archived ------
Sir_T: Well ya, he touched her elbow with his little finger, after she had grabbed for the Microphone three times and Accosta was struggling to hold onto the mic. She touched him first. The "assault" would not have bruised a sparrow. It was not a Karate chop.
Plus, other reporters stood up and supported Accosta.
*sigh* you are going to make me dig up the footage of that Republican candidate bodyslamming a reporter that Trump approved of, and that Guy on Trumps staff who shoved a female reporter out of the way during the campaign arent you? Oh whu cares, its not like you would admit your double standards anyway.
Is it just me that see's that almost everything little_t post is just an attempt to sow discord? Plus, other reporters stood up and supported Accosta.
*sigh* you are going to make me dig up the footage of that Republican candidate bodyslamming a reporter that Trump approved of, and that Guy on Trumps staff who shoved a female reporter out of the way during the campaign arent you? Oh whu cares, its not like you would admit your double standards anyway.
And isn't that one of the things the Chinese and a few other countries pay people to do?
Just some food for thought.
------ This poll is Archived ------
bigjb62: Is it just me that see's that almost everything little_t post is just an attempt to sow discord?
And isn't that one of the things the Chinese and a few other countries pay people to do?
Just some food for thought.
Yep the evil Chinese mocked up the whole incednet with faced footage of her reaching for the Mixrophone twoce before. And isn't that one of the things the Chinese and a few other countries pay people to do?
Just some food for thought.
This Twitter post has the FULL incident. The LIBERAL MEDIA, seems to only wanto to focus on the part right as she put her left hadn on the Mic becasue CSPAN was fucused on the Presidents faced as she waled up and reached for the Mic twice. This twittter post has the FULL incident, starting just before she actually walked up to him. Its 48 seconds long, and all fuched on the 2 of them,
If you watch that, you can see that I am "being distuptive" by telling the full truth, which is always disruptive to liars.
I wisn I could copy Videos on twitter over.
------ This poll is Archived ------
Sir_T: Yep the evil Chinese mocked up the whole incednet with faced footage of her reaching for the Mixrophone twoce before.
This Twitter post has the FULL incident. The LIBERAL MEDIA, seems to only wanto to focus on the part right as she put her left hadn on the Mic becasue CSPAN was fucused on the Presidents faced as she waled up and reached for the Mic twice. This twittter post has the FULL incident, starting just before she actually walked up to him. Its 48 seconds long, and all fuched on the 2 of them,
If you watch that, you can see that I am "being distuptive" by telling the full truth, which is always disruptive to liars.
I wisn I could copy Videos on twitter over.
If you say so Riz... oh sorry little_t.This Twitter post has the FULL incident. The LIBERAL MEDIA, seems to only wanto to focus on the part right as she put her left hadn on the Mic becasue CSPAN was fucused on the Presidents faced as she waled up and reached for the Mic twice. This twittter post has the FULL incident, starting just before she actually walked up to him. Its 48 seconds long, and all fuched on the 2 of them,
If you watch that, you can see that I am "being distuptive" by telling the full truth, which is always disruptive to liars.
I wisn I could copy Videos on twitter over.
------ This poll is Archived ------
Sir_T: Yep the evil Chinese mocked up the whole incednet with faced footage of her reaching for the Mixrophone twoce before.
This Twitter post has the FULL incident. The LIBERAL MEDIA, seems to only wanto to focus on the part right as she put her left hadn on the Mic becasue CSPAN was fucused on the Presidents faced as she waled up and reached for the Mic twice. This twittter post has the FULL incident, starting just before she actually walked up to him. Its 48 seconds long, and all fuched on the 2 of them,
If you watch that, you can see that I am "being distuptive" by telling the full truth, which is always disruptive to liars.
I wisn I could copy Videos on twitter over.
This Twitter post has the FULL incident. The LIBERAL MEDIA, seems to only wanto to focus on the part right as she put her left hadn on the Mic becasue CSPAN was fucused on the Presidents faced as she waled up and reached for the Mic twice. This twittter post has the FULL incident, starting just before she actually walked up to him. Its 48 seconds long, and all fuched on the 2 of them,
If you watch that, you can see that I am "being distuptive" by telling the full truth, which is always disruptive to liars.
I wisn I could copy Videos on twitter over.
whats for dinner?------ This poll is Archived ------
Actually relooking at the twitter video, I wasnt entirely accurate. Trump clearly signaled to her, she got up and reached over Acostas hand with her right hand, looked at Trump, reached over Accosta's arm again to the Mic and toched his elbow with her lower arm, looked at Trump again, paused for a moment, then reached under Acostas arm to grab hold of the Mic. Accosta at that point looked at her and said "Excuse me maam" and she sat down, and Trump and Accosta continued talking.
“The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” —George Orwell
Once again, the full video is at this twitter link.
“The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” —George Orwell
Once again, the full video is at this twitter link.
------ This poll is Archived ------
Any one defending Acosta is a maggot . Assault charges should be brought against Acosta , and may yet be , probably why the cur has not apologized as he would not want to admit he did anything wrong .
------ This poll is Archived ------
epirb: Any one defending Acosta is a maggot . Assault charges should be brought against Acosta , and may yet be , probably why the cur has not apologized as he would not want to admit he did anything wrong .
Wonder if verbal assault can be categorised in the same way? Then so many members will have to think twice before posting 
So many two-faced hypocrites on CS these days it's like a Republican convention.
------ This poll is Archived ------
rizlared: Wonder if verbal assault can be categorised in the same way? Then so many members will have to think twice before posting
So many two-faced hypocrites on CS these days it's like a Republican convention.
One thing Riz ,Acosta's feet would not be touching the ground if he had tried that crap in China , or his earlier display not long after Trump was elected . And I don't mean that as some slight against the Chinese . Another thing the west should adopt from China , the way they help muslims get over themselves .So many two-faced hypocrites on CS these days it's like a Republican convention.
------ This poll is Archived ------
epirb: Any one defending Acosta is a maggot . Assault charges should be brought against Acosta , and may yet be , probably why the cur has not apologized as he would not want to admit he did anything wrong .
He didn't bloody touch the girl.------ This poll is Archived ------
This Poll is Archived
This Poll is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Poll get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
More Threads
biggest lie
Which Of These Is Your Favorite Breakfast
Who will be The Last Person To Post... VERSION FOUR
beauty of the heart
Manifesting
Iran- Israel war
Trump on Trial
who shaped your life?
Eid Mubarak
Cat Calling
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
Stats for this Poll
20 Votes
3,353 Views
113 Comments
Created: Nov 2018
Last Viewed: Apr 16
Last Commented: Nov 2018
Last Voted: Mar 2019
54 Likes
Last Liked: Nov 2018
88 DisAgrees
Last DisAgreed: Nov 2018
Jim acosta - guilty or not guilty of putting his hands on a woman(Vote Below)