Yes, because A pre-nup wouldn’t be needed if you go 50-50
33%
4 Votes
Hell no, whats yours is yours, whats mine is mine.
42%
5 Votes
Yes, even if their 40 year-old daughter wants to come home again and go back to school to start a new career with no exit plan.
0%
0 Votes
No, I don’t have another 30 years to do it all over again.
17%
2 Votes
Yes, but its Only possible to do the 50-50 thing if you marry galrads.
0%
0 Votes
No, don’t even ever trust galrads
8%
1 Votes
12 Total Votes
Should they combine everything including bank accounts, investments and retirement payments even if one earns more and has accumulated more money and stuff?
At least 50% of American marriages end in divorce (approx the 4th year), the more marriages, the more likely to end in divorce. (I guess it gets easier to leave).
EXRED: Nope for later in life both would have offspring,
I would say both pool a certain amount to cover all bills food etc then have own bank accounts to do as one pleases, bailing kids out etc
Thanks...... I get that but what about marital property or non marital property that probably becomes marital property. Take a home or condo (none rental property) that eventually would become a 50-50 co-ownership marital property (on separation or divorce) however the lower income wage earner’s income only allows them to say contribute and pay 30% of a couple’s mortgage?
galrads: Thanks...... I get that but what about marital property or non marital property that probably becomes marital property. Take a home or condo (none rental property) that eventually would become a 50-50 co-ownership marital property (on separation or divorce) however the lower income wage earner’s income only allows them to say contribute and pay 30% of a couple’s mortgage?
Martial property; It depends on the state, you got married in.
CossackCat: Martial property; It depends on the state, you got married in.
True, in Ohio, i believe If the homeowner partner always pays the mortgage, insurance premiums, real estate taxes etc from their own income for property they owned before a marriage, that property cant be considered marital property. I may be wrong about this, but i doubt it.
galrads: True, in Ohio, i believe If the homeowner partner always pays the mortgage, insurance premiums, real estate taxes etc from their own income for property they owned before a marriage, that property cant be considered marital property. I may be wrong about this, but i doubt it.
I never heard about that, and if true.. that does not protect offspring. See what I mean? A wife and 3 kids would be on the street, because the husband is doing 9-5.
galrads: True, in Ohio, i believe If the homeowner partner always pays the mortgage, insurance premiums, real estate taxes etc from their own income for property they owned before a marriage, that property cant be considered marital property. I may be wrong about this, but i doubt it.
Keep in mind also, that spouse and partner are two different things. And "partner" does not have many rights. (Nor should they ).
What's in it for the man to get married these days Why bother women are the only one's...who stand to benefit from marriage and divorce...So I guess it's important to lot of them
I'm in favor of a pre-nup stating that in the event of a divorce both parties should be awarded what they came into the marriage with....bank accounts, tangible items, grandmas's vase, automobiles, jewelry, real estate, etc. and the most important of all and who gets the dog.
If both parties were working during the marriage then the income during that time should be split 50/50 including the refund on tax returns.
If stocks/bonds were purchased during the marriage they should be sold or one party can buy out the other party. But if he/she came into the marriage with stocks/bonds then they belong to the person who purchased them.
In my divorce my husband got every single dollar that was in the bank. All I wanted was sole custody of our daughter and I got it. I had every right to ask for alimony because he was an alcoholic who abused me but I didn't want that either.
I got the most important thing......our daughter who I raised by myself.
secretagent09: I'm in favor of a pre-nup stating that in the event of a divorce both parties should be awarded what they came into the marriage with....bank accounts, tangible items, grandmas's vase, automobiles, jewelry, real estate, etc. and the most important of all and who gets the dog.
If both parties were working during the marriage then the income during that time should be split 50/50 including the refund on tax returns.
If stocks/bonds were purchased during the marriage they should be sold or one party can buy out the other party. But if he/she came into the marriage with stocks/bonds then they belong to the person who purchased them.
In my divorce my husband got every single dollar that was in the bank. All I wanted was sole custody of our daughter and I got it. I had every right to ask for alimony because he was an alcoholic who abused me but I didn't want that either.
I got the most important thing......our daughter who I raised by myself.
galrads: Thanks...... I get that but what about marital property or non marital property that probably becomes marital property. Take a home or condo (none rental property) that eventually would become a 50-50 co-ownership marital property (on separation or divorce) however the lower income wage earner’s income only allows them to say contribute and pay 30% of a couple’s mortgage?
Yep understand but sell house, buy new for new memories for both, when kids are involved we over here can buy half the house, not joint buyers if you get me, so still your half house can be inherited by your own family,.
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
Should couples combine & make all financial matters fifty-fifty when marrying late in life?(Vote Below)