I was notified of my requirement to serve, but for some reason, I was later notified that my obligation was rescinded.
8%
1 Votes
I have never been required to serve on a jury.
0%
0 Votes
I hope I never have to make a decision which could affect someone's life.
8%
1 Votes
No, but I think the proceedings might prove to be enlightening....what judges have to go through daily with people and attorneys.
25%
3 Votes
12 Total Votes
Some people have had to serve jury duty, others have not. Depending on the situation, sometimes they are sequestered away from family and friends until the end of trial, which can be months. I can understand why some people don't want to be on a jury.
I served 5 weeks, and sat two trials. One was rather long-Friday - to Friday. Years later, while describing that trial, a fellow in the bar ver sanctimoniously told me that I, and the eleven other jurors, had voted inappropriately, because of this and that. I chose not to argue. However, here, I want to explain a key element regarding jury trials. Convening a trial means the defendants are challenging the charges. If everything was slam-dunk, then the outcome would be settled. But a jury is asked to determine an outcome based, frequently, on circumstances, probababilities, and, exponentially troubling, gray area. The public may read about a supposed crime/incident, and sometimes righteously, form an opinion/desired outcome, but a jury digs deep, down to bedrock, and has at their disposal, much, much more information. For example, two things helped decide our ruling: the correct usage and meaning of ONE WORD, and a tiny notation on an “arrow” sticky-note. Minor, perhaps, but evidence the “public” could not factor in. I’m really not trying to sound condescending, but people (in general) need to look before they leap, and not rashly make up their minds...there is a beloved physician STILL in prison, convicted of murdering his wife. He is systematically prevented from having his case heard again. The law appears stubborn. Virtually everyone, including myself, supports him. He didn’t do it. But public opinion was so unbalanced at the time, it polluted the jury..my six-bits for today
rohaan: I served 5 weeks, and sat two trials. One was rather long-Friday - to Friday. Years later, while describing that trial, a fellow in the bar ver sanctimoniously told me that I, and the eleven other jurors, had voted inappropriately, because of this and that. I chose not to argue. However, here, I want to explain a key element regarding jury trials. Convening a trial means the defendants are challenging the charges. If everything was slam-dunk, then the outcome would be settled. But a jury is asked to determine an outcome based, frequently, on circumstances, probababilities, and, exponentially troubling, gray area. The public may read about a supposed crime/incident, and sometimes righteously, form an opinion/desired outcome, but a jury digs deep, down to bedrock, and has at their disposal, much, much more information. For example, two things helped decide our ruling: the correct usage and meaning of ONE WORD, and a tiny notation on an “arrow” sticky-note. Minor, perhaps, but evidence the “public” could not factor in. I’m really not trying to sound condescending, but people (in general) need to look before they leap, and not rashly make up their minds...there is a beloved physician STILL in prison, convicted of murdering his wife. He is systematically prevented from having his case heard again. The law appears stubborn. Virtually everyone, including myself, supports him. He didn’t do it. But public opinion was so unbalanced at the time, it polluted the jury..my six-bits for today
Well said
I got called once..but I had already booked my overseas vacation and had proof, so they ‘let me go’.
I served on a jury 1 time. It was a doctor vs patient trial. We were given note pads and pencils to write down things to keep track of. I wrote myself a few questions I had and waited for the lawyers to get answers for those. I did not write during the time we were hearing the details, and waited until afterwards to write any info. One of lawyers seemed to get upset as I was not writing while he was talking. I noticed what seemed to me, that he was kind of reading my questions, and trying to answer those. After his turn of talking, he convinced the others that I might be a ringer, and instead of loosing the court, they decided to settle. Jumping to conclusions.
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
Have you ever had to serve on a jury, and if yes, how would you rate the experience ?(Vote Below)