To keep things simple, all measurements in mm which is the current standard for these matters. It's a non-judgmental study but let's face it we all know what this means, so if you could refrain from wolf-whistling or laughing too much. If you wish to remain anonymous then that's fine, but everyone will know you're lying about it or in denial. Have a supercool day.
I'd say she's in the range of 3-4mm which is balancing on the precipice of seriousness. Though not in the extreme range it is worth noting for future reference.
I'm just wondering why you said Madonna not Elton John.
Well, in these modern times allowances must be afforded for the catcher side if the situation. Obviously the data will be affected by bias confirmation if we start including the pitcher. So I guess these statistical assumptions are based on by various things we must take as logical probability, based on attire and performance.
The real test is when she eats a hamburger. My guess is she drags just the lettuce out of it, whereas Madonna drags the lettuce, tomato, and bacon out of it. A true star.
pat8lanips: I think we all learnt something today.
We totally did. My diastema is as good as non-existing, but on the bright side: I could easily filtre plankton, if I had a spiracle. But I'm working on it :D
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
Ladies, describe your diastema.(Vote Below)
It's a non-judgmental study but let's face it we all know what this means, so if you could refrain from wolf-whistling or laughing too much.
If you wish to remain anonymous then that's fine, but everyone will know you're lying about it or in denial.
Have a supercool day.