Should 'Gilly' be limited to 217 threads per day? (193)

Dec 16, 2007 9:16 AM CST Should 'Gilly' be limited to 217 threads per day?
Lagoona22
Lagoona22Lagoona22Bugibba, Majjistral Malta161 Threads 11 Polls 10,711 Posts
I like Gilly.....he's a lot like cabernet....it's really an acquired taste...you get used to it, then you start liking it, but you always have a headache in the morning when you overdose on the stuff.....drinking
Dec 16, 2007 9:17 AM CST Should 'Gilly' be limited to 217 threads per day?
martyg
martygmartygDublin/Kildare, Dublin Ireland55 Threads 3 Polls 4,322 Posts
hug kiss Nice of you to saywave
Dec 16, 2007 9:19 AM CST Should 'Gilly' be limited to 217 threads per day?
howboutu
howboutuhowboutuDecatur, Alabama USA3 Threads 796 Posts
We can all have a beer but save the hickys for me!


rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing tongue
Dec 16, 2007 9:22 AM CST Should 'Gilly' be limited to 217 threads per day?
Zellarrone1
Zellarrone1Zellarrone1Hull, East Riding of Yorkshire, England UK33 Threads 4 Polls 7,644 Posts
You are welcome hug kiss

santa waving
Dec 16, 2007 9:22 AM CST Should 'Gilly' be limited to 217 threads per day?
gillyloves69
gillyloves69gillyloves69london, Greater London, England UK1,533 Threads 7 Polls 7,359 Posts
thats the biggest load of rubbish you people always come up instead of the threads ! we've heard it all before ( and always from the same type of people ) !

if you spend more time posting more threads yourself instead of talking about other members you won't even notice that ...

and besides if you find that the page stays the same that long its simply because you've been starring at it for too long instead of 'just getting on with your own bussiness '

and yes ..it normaly it takes this time after talking about the issue for people like you to start showing your true colours

head banger

seen it and heard it all before

your topics is whats talking ....and you can post as much threads as you want

head banger
Dec 16, 2007 9:24 AM CST Should 'Gilly' be limited to 217 threads per day?
Irishman1
Irishman1Irishman1Dublin, Ireland946 Posts
lets not beat around the bush here folks,the aliens invaded the threads last night laugh i personally was lost in spacelaugh i think the guy in question thinks we all have bad eyesight,the fact that all his threads are written in capital letterslaugh nothing personal against the guy, but limit your threads to give other people a chance. cool
Dec 16, 2007 9:26 AM CST Should 'Gilly' be limited to 217 threads per day?
BnaturAl
BnaturAlBnaturAlSarnia, Ontario Canada107 Threads 7 Polls 6,811 Posts
The wise words of a philosopher... "in anger no man speaks of that but himself".

since you will not accept wisdom, staying on topic, rationality or olive branches I say to you..

santa waving


have a merry christmas bud
Dec 16, 2007 9:30 AM CST Should 'Gilly' be limited to 217 threads per day?
martyg
martygmartygDublin/Kildare, Dublin Ireland55 Threads 3 Polls 4,322 Posts
right on targetthumbs up
Dec 16, 2007 9:33 AM CST Should 'Gilly' be limited to 217 threads per day?
Eupho
EuphoEuphoWild Wild South West, England UK49 Threads 12 Polls 6,581 Posts
On target? confused
Dec 16, 2007 9:34 AM CST Should 'Gilly' be limited to 217 threads per day?
Zellarrone1
Zellarrone1Zellarrone1Hull, East Riding of Yorkshire, England UK33 Threads 4 Polls 7,644 Posts
I concur thumbs up
Dec 16, 2007 9:37 AM CST Should 'Gilly' be limited to 217 threads per day?
gillyloves69
gillyloves69gillyloves69london, Greater London, England UK1,533 Threads 7 Polls 7,359 Posts
you wont need to take him to see me because i'll be staying at yours as well !!!

laugh rolling on the floor laughing laugh rolling on the floor laughing

ere .....how big is your place !...can you accomadate everybody

banana

you can post threads or replies as often as you like eupho ! in lower case or capitals girl ...i'll always enjoy reading your stuff

thats what is really all about >>> but some of us don't bother people we don't get on with or say bad things about them

why ????...because we don't need to

YOU'RE WORTH TURNING THE PAGES FOR GIRL

danceline

you're one of the most geniune people on this site ...and the star of connectingsingles



applause applause applause applause

right i'm going to the gym now

kiss kiss

by the way hi ryblossom !

kiss
Dec 16, 2007 9:39 AM CST Should 'Gilly' be limited to 217 threads per day?
trish123
trish123trish123Macclesfield, Cheshire, England UK177 Threads 4 Polls 13,724 Posts
theres nothing stopping people from bumping their threads back up is there?

Gilly sometimes has a problem with his eyesight which is why he sometimes uses capitals a lot

There are lots of threads which lots of us dont like..... my solution is to leave them alone and not even look at the content so it doesnt get me wound up - simple dunno
Dec 16, 2007 9:41 AM CST Should 'Gilly' be limited to 217 threads per day?
martyg
martygmartygDublin/Kildare, Dublin Ireland55 Threads 3 Polls 4,322 Posts
on target=straight to the point=hit the nail on the head,

something like thatlaugh wave
Dec 16, 2007 9:44 AM CST Should 'Gilly' be limited to 217 threads per day?
gillyloves69
gillyloves69gillyloves69london, Greater London, England UK1,533 Threads 7 Polls 7,359 Posts
wave

hello darling how are you ?

kiss kiss

what have you been up to then ?

conversing

talk to you when i come bck from the gym trish ....is it snowing up there in lancashire ???

and what have you bought me for christmas ????laugh
Dec 16, 2007 9:49 AM CST Should 'Gilly' be limited to 217 threads per day?
Irishman1
Irishman1Irishman1Dublin, Ireland946 Posts
The guy in question wrote on average about twelve threads in the space of an couple of minutes last night,i personally,don't even bother reading the headline to his threads.
Dec 16, 2007 9:50 AM CST Should 'Gilly' be limited to 217 threads per day?
riyablossom
riyablossomriyablossomsomewhere, Pennsylvania USA184 Threads 18 Polls 11,244 Posts
Regardless of everything.. practically seeing how the issue is going .. and the polls speak for themselves.. a limit would be a good idea.

My opinion.
Dec 16, 2007 9:56 AM CST Should 'Gilly' be limited to 217 threads per day?
I agree Riya. The poll results do show that most agree with the thread starter.
Dec 16, 2007 9:58 AM CST Should 'Gilly' be limited to 217 threads per day?
Indyfella
IndyfellaIndyfellaindianapolis, Indiana USA152 Threads 8 Polls 18,150 Posts
I have trouble coming up w/a thought provoking thread.....that would be of interest, yet not "tweek" too many people.

-certain jokes are a no-go
-certain topics drop off the radar in 10 minutes
-certain topics fall into the politically correct zone so they won't be
discussed in a thoughtful manner

~just rambling~
Dec 16, 2007 10:01 AM CST Should 'Gilly' be limited to 217 threads per day?
riyablossom
riyablossomriyablossomsomewhere, Pennsylvania USA184 Threads 18 Polls 11,244 Posts
me too ... just lost in bwn sensible and stupid .. to come up with a thread idea !!
Dec 16, 2007 10:01 AM CST Should 'Gilly' be limited to 217 threads per day?
howboutu
howboutuhowboutuDecatur, Alabama USA3 Threads 796 Posts
Well if going by the poll then Gilly needs to up his post threads per day cause he has come no where near reaching his 217 post limit.rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing
Dec 16, 2007 10:08 AM CST Should 'Gilly' be limited to 217 threads per day?
DizzyDi
DizzyDiDizzyDiLancashire, England UK26 Threads 1 Polls 1,761 Posts
just leave my mate Gilly alone, I don't always join in the forums but I do love reading what people are up toprofessor
Dec 16, 2007 10:17 AM CST Should 'Gilly' be limited to 217 threads per day?
Maria1974
Maria1974Maria1974hmmmm, Hamburg Germany6 Threads 131 Posts
Gilly the poll results show that you need to send an additional 200 threads before midnight tonight !

Start now !

applause
Dec 16, 2007 10:25 AM CST Should 'Gilly' be limited to 217 threads per day?
cardsfan24
cardsfan24cardsfan24somewhere in paradise, Illinois USA40 Threads 1 Polls 5,169 Posts
It's a free country, he can post another weird and uninteresting thread after another for all i give a Sh**, but let's do put a limit on him, because Doing fifty threads in 5 min ... is a little outrageoue...>


MY OWN FREAKING OPINION
Dec 16, 2007 10:36 AM CST Should 'Gilly' be limited to 217 threads per day?
Poppa2Divas
Poppa2DivasPoppa2DivasIn The Mountains, USA4 Threads 242 Posts
I will Agree with most (the Majority) i have seen the highly multiple listings...
and have answered many of them...
a lot with no reply for days or none at all...
i have no problem with the Titles of the threads or thier content.
I too posts threads... But only like one or two at a time and usually keep in them interactively with the posters on them.

And i Understand we are Not abiding by the rules when we mention names... But we all do it and for the most part it does not seem to be an issue...
So with that said,,,

In my Opinion i like Gilly as to his inquisitive mind.
I enjoy his sense of humor when he does interact in his threads.
I think he is really a great guy on the whole.

But i also have to agree that the capitals on every thread and the amounts at each ttime are somewhat annoying when one is looking for particular threads they were just on.

Also i get annoyed because i think :how many different threads could you honestly answer at one time (your Own Threads)

I would wish to see one Good thread about a general round about...
Example
HEY CANADA WHATS UP OVER THERE...
And then list the questions on the first post and go from thier...

But to see
HEy USA
HEY RUSSIA
HEY PLANET X
WHY DO DANCE
COULD YOU BE SOMETHING
PULL MY FINGER
WHY DO THINK YOU ARE SO GOOD
DO YOU BELIEVE IN ALIENS
WAS JESUS A JUNKIE
HOW BOUT THEM BEARS
and a few other different member threds mixed in you can't really see

IN ALL HONESTY how many of them can you really tend to at one time and actually have some input in.

I like the Guy...
But i have to agree With Martyg on this one.
I do not see any input from the one in question on the other many threads around the site...
Or even in the personal threads posted by the one in question.

Most of the threads die out after about 3 pages if they even get that far...
it is i believe other mebers would like to see the opinion (real opinoin) of others in threads that are not thier own...
Is it more about control or is it a question of some other problem?
I do not want to demean anyone or say bad things about others... but sometimes that happens to all of us.
But i do not want to be dishonest with others and not be a part of the whole experience.
So i must say i agree it is about quantity NOT quality...
But when it is a flood How much Quality could there be in it.
JMO
Dec 16, 2007 10:44 AM CST Should 'Gilly' be limited to 217 threads per day?
martyg
martygmartygDublin/Kildare, Dublin Ireland55 Threads 3 Polls 4,322 Posts
Extremely well writtenhandshake santa waving
Dec 16, 2007 10:45 AM CST Should 'Gilly' be limited to 217 threads per day?
gillyloves69
gillyloves69gillyloves69london, Greater London, England UK1,533 Threads 7 Polls 7,359 Posts
wave

hi maria !

kiss

i've dfinately got to go now !

but you're another person see through it all ...it was nowhere near 217

and its always the same type of people ....all the time ....
chat soon

cheers
Dec 16, 2007 10:47 AM CST Should 'Gilly' be limited to 217 threads per day?
foreveryoung1
foreveryoung1foreveryoung1cartagena, Murcia Spain2 Threads 1 Polls 2,984 Posts
I commented in some other thread a few days ago, that each person should be limited to 3 new threads each day, and quite a lot agreed with that, should we ask the mods?
Dec 16, 2007 10:49 AM CST Should 'Gilly' be limited to 217 threads per day?
Nederby
NederbyNederbyfredericia, South Denmark Denmark4 Threads 1 Polls 148 Posts
good idea...
got my support...handshake
Dec 16, 2007 10:56 AM CST Should 'Gilly' be limited to 217 threads per day?
BnaturAl
BnaturAlBnaturAlSarnia, Ontario Canada107 Threads 7 Polls 6,811 Posts
I voted number 4 as did only 2 others.

Opinions are like arseholes, every1 has one.

though the poles may say otherwise, it seems choice number 4 is the clear winner even though only 3 votes show that in fact. professor
Dec 16, 2007 11:00 AM CST Should 'Gilly' be limited to 217 threads per day?
Poppa2Divas
Poppa2DivasPoppa2DivasIn The Mountains, USA4 Threads 242 Posts
i remeber that and i was an agreed poster...

i think the content is irelavent... but the give other idiots a chance to get some front page time too is great...rolling on the floor laughing

Me being one of the odiots who have to Bump my silly thread just to keep it visible laugh

But i also have been found in just about every thread that is on the front page .
(hijacking and getting off topic and occasionally actually sticking to the topic)

Isn't it all about getting together and exchanging thoughts and ideas and just having fun????

I rarely start a thread myself and am thankful for those who do...
But i agree How many does one person need to try and be interactive in at one time.

And Gain I agree with Marty on this one...
It is not a personal attack on an individual, But more of an "OPEN YOUR EYES" kind of a thing.

We all who have posted in this thread will be found on about 80% of all other threads posted.
WE get involvled with pretty much everything on forums.

It is just questionable that others would control front page forums but rarely if ever be invovled with other users material.

I think the use of the NAME was kind of a fupah But with some people it may be neccassary to use a HELLO WE ARE DISCUSSING WHAT YOU DO THAT ANNOYS SO MANY SO PLEASE COME HERE AND INTERACY WITH US,SO WE ALL CAN BE HAPPY AND UNDERSTOOD.

And Agian it is not based on Hate... because i truly do like the one being discussed...
but i also would like to see more of him in the mix of threads.
Sharing with all the others who share everyday.

SO as attacking as this poll may seem i think it should be more constructive than destructive...
But that is up to the readers i guess...
JMO AGAIN.... hope it brings some light to the problem at hand.
We use cookies to ensure that you have the best experience possible on our website. Read Our Privacy Policy Here