RE: Guilty, guilty, 8 times over. Jailbirds of a feather, might be imprisoned together.

They don't have any thing. There is a lot of long time pursuits and information missing from the media with cohen and Trump's personal matters.

Trump won't be charged. It's not a legal matter with a sitting president. It's a congressional one. What are they going to charge him with? They have nothing. even now, mueller is so far out of the russian collusion probe, he should be imprisoned himself. How many times did the Judge scold prosecutors over manafort when it came to "collusion"? Even the judge knew why they were really there. So did the juror that stopped the sweeping conviction.

Just think where hillary, obozo, and all of their cronies would be right now if we had a truly legitimate justice system at the federal level.

RE: Guilty, guilty, 8 times over. Jailbirds of a feather, might be imprisoned together.

Even now, new reports are starting to read more like blackmail and extortion attempts by cohen.

More felony charges but not against Trump.grin

RE: Guilty, guilty, 8 times over. Jailbirds of a feather, might be imprisoned together.

cohen already testified to mueller that he didn't know if Trump knew about Jr.'s meeting an a whole slew of what ever else.

I'm interested in what else cohen's lawyer friend in California might have to say as well, if he is invited to attend.

Get over it jim; still no crimes committed concerning Trump and what they have now still has nothing to do with collusion. Where did the campaign funds come from? An FEC person has weighed in as well; a hillary supporter at that.

Manafort served a whole two months before being fired for questionable practices.

So cohen lied before? What's that say about now?


RE: Guilty, guilty, 8 times over. Jailbirds of a feather, might be imprisoned together.

How does it have to do with the campaign finances? Cohen wasn't the treasurer.

What does an attempt to purchase rights to a story of which the enquirer held at the time have to do with a campaign? What does Trumps personal life behind closed doors have to do with the campaign? Even stormy said "consentual" for what ever the whole story was.

Cohen took it upon himself, even stated it in public, out of pocket. There aren't many straws to grasp when Guilliani lays things out flat.

Are they going to try acting stupid because trump paid his electric, food, and clothing bills too? Cohen was a regular payroll employee. They generally get reimbursed for their expenses. Still no straws just actual common sense. The law would allow and support a lawsuit if Trump DIDN'T pay as expected.

You still miss the parts where Trump's white house, people such as Don Mcgahn, testified before the committee.

In 2017 FEC was heavily involved with legal and illegal donations tp campaigns. There were a lot of refunds mailed out.

Poor cohen also has another lawyer friend in California he talked too quite a bit. Apparently cohen, mad and jealous that he didn't get any physical part in Trump's campaign like his children did. We have great motive to lie.

No straws to grasp at what so ever. The fact that things like Awan can walk away with evidence against him, with democratic support, while they keep trying every thing they can against Trump, is all of the evidence I need, of how deeply corrupt the obozo regime was and is.

RE: Yet another Trump presidential campaign worker, working on behalf of the Russians

Here's a little more depth:

(ret)/2018/08/20/what-is-john-brennan-hiding-n2511452?utm_source=thdaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&newsletterad=&profileid=


The manafort jury is still out at this moment. 4 days? Must have been one hack of a defense. It must have had some other truths the media didn't add.grin

RE: Yet another Trump presidential campaign worker, working on behalf of the Russians

Well Jack?

Who rolled back regulations to let the economy grow?

Who's actually building border security?

Who's actually slowing illegal immigration and increased vetting of "refugees"?

Who has actually reformed tax laws?

Who's actually fighting terrorism to get Iraq back on track?

Who's actually getting countries and people to the bargaining table?

Where is the evidence on collusion?

Who's working but donating their salary every pay day?

Flash back to the good 'ol obozo days; before we were dealing with the left over corruption.

RE: Yet another Trump presidential campaign worker, working on behalf of the Russians

So which is it? Nothing about mueller, the FBi, or even the investigation itself, has any substance that be trusted except wasting $millions of dollars of tax payer funds.

Cohen under investigations for his practices. Much like the steele dosier still hasn't surfaced any substance against Trump because every thing is being stretched for and fabricated for people like you.

Jr. didn't do any thing wrong. Trump didn't know.

The way the FBI operates since at least 2009, the reason for the decades old charges being filed and prosecuted all of a sudden for many, they're hoping they get someone to lie on the stand for a plea bargain at best.

Like the steele dossier they can't use but have gotten away with so far, it's going to have to be provable to be any type of prosecution.

Nothing from nothing, still leaves nothing.

RE: Yet another Trump presidential campaign worker, working on behalf of the Russians

What has mueller and DoJ brought in his indictments?

One Russian company that didn't exist?

The fact that when russia offers opportunity for them to at least question those "agents" in any environment, they run with their tails tucked clucking about how that's not how they operate. rolling on the floor laughing

What damages? The propaganda the dems and DoJ created? Why aren't they investigating the hacking of the RNC? What about other establishments? Why didn't obozo do anything if they knew so much for so long? The DoJ lied about no damages from the so-called Russian meddling? How many elections has the U.S. meddled with? Besides our last presidential election in 2016?

It's actually your stories that are full of holes and even congress has stood with statements on no proof of any thing.

They have nothing unless they can make it up and make it stick. That's why they need those charges against the people like popadopalous, manafort, Flynn, and others. They need your weak minds to stay in the clouds even though the only one remotely close was Flynn lying when he had no reason too.

FBI ex-employees stand to face charges themselves. Security clearance revocation is past due for many.

You keep squaking but there still isn't any substance to your hopes and dreams. Much like the dem party, rinos, and hillary.

RE: "IN THE DOG HOUSE"

Feed the trolls.

What's the worst thing that can happen?

Learning more about the various types of opposition?

Better still, maybe an exchange of information that actually turns a light on, even if it's only about 1/2 a watt.

I suppose I'd rather hear or see what's being played vs. staying in the dark and pretending it's not happening.

RE: "HUMANITY"

I use the term "go back" because some of the current destruction now, is because lines of conservation have already been lowered.

That is how it starts. Maybe we can allow THIS much to be used; as long as it's put back. There's a lot there, maybe we can use a little more...for the right price.

Even with some animal species, man tries but is careless, as he again, destroys more than he saves.

RE: "UNDERSTANDING MAN"..(85)

Such public popularity would have it's severe down sides in many forms.

So would one suppose, embarking on the world tour would be a way to ensure the family has more normal funeral proceedings, with legitimate attendance?

Hard call. Even with all of that fortune, it would be extremely hard to keep things low key enough to be where they might truly want to be. Unless it's wanting to be on the tour itself. Under such circumstances; would any one be able to tell the difference with out full confessions and acknowledgment from the "Icon"?

RE: About Trump

It took a lot of executive orders to cancel obozo's damages. It's one of the few times I can recall tha6t government was actually relative instead accumulative. In positive direction at that.

It's actually pretty amazing that instead of trying to call for or arming wars; he's really trying to bring a quicker end the ones we can't just drop and actual peace where he can.

Can the media and Trump haters handle that kind of action instead of the words they say and the words we've always heard from other leaders as they do the opposite?

RE: NATO vs TRUMP

We have a nato pact which is true, for now. It doesn't seem right to leave out other bodies, much larger, that could actually offer interference. It has in the past with and with out action for various reasons.

Where will the nato members turn when/if they decide they no longer want to play ball? They have options closer to home if they choose. They may or may not be using them for more than just trade partners already.

Their largest options and other ties could come from the U.N. Potential new pacts to be made from such a large gathering of countries and representatives.

I don't see nato lasting forever or growing much. It seems more clear when considering that there are members trying to cut back rather than meet their agreements.

RE: It's hard to know what to worry about the most

We're going to keep going until we either bring about our own destruction or nature does it for us.

If I try guessing at it based on what I know and have learned, I don't think most of us now, will be around for the showdown. Absolutely zero idea on when that might happen. It doesn't seem like enough has happened so far to bring it about.

RE: Trump gets to pick another Supreme Court Justice.

I guess what people fail to realize is that conservative justices, usually uphold and follow laws instead of trying to re-write or re-interpret them.

RE: Excellent take on the Mexican Parent-Child separation issue

With all that Bush didn't do for the country, lady bush has nothing important to say. We are already caring for them with heart so Melania is on a wrong track as well, to even remotely suggest other. At tax payer expense. More proof and reason for an actual boarder wall. Canada is putting their foot down illegal immigration too, for a reason.

Keeping track of and caring for the children until they can be sent home vs. what? What have the parents brought them into? They don't know but it's not good dodging law enforcement and no way to raise children all in itself. what other dangers? They learn to steal and many other unsavory "survival" techniques? What other problems would they fall victim too?

The children are getting what they need and more. Hopefully for the many that will remember once they get home, a life long lesson of things not to be repeated.

RE: Excellent take on the Mexican Parent-Child separation issue

Separation might be a larger life saving factor . I'm all for it. Read up on the facilities.

Over crowding is a factor will continue to be a factor until we can process and ship more of them back home.

In the mean time, the children are cared for.

RE: Excellent take on the Mexican Parent-Child separation issue

We take a stance like should have been all along and people go stupid with all kinds of crazy rhetoric and stories. Unless it's clinton or obozo.


RE: The historic moment is happening.

Although I think Kim is crazy enough to try something stupid, I don't believe he will.

For some reason, I'm willing to accept that things are on the level for peace and possible unity, to happen. It would be a great thing to see Korea as a whole country again. I've only heard that they were a whole country once, in history books and such. That may not happen any time soon but it's a nice thought.

RE: Canada watch out

He hurt his chances by dropping out. He re-entered but the damages were already done.

Kinda like bill clinton's impeachment by the house then acquittal by the senate.

No happy ending for any one but the individual in question.

RE: Canada watch out

Many DID get the message.

Perot didn't have enough backing so rather than waste votes, the lesser evils won out again. At least that's what people were hoping for on the "lesser" part.

RE: Canada watch out

If trade evens out, almost ALL can benefit relatively equally. It's actually their consumer markets and spending that spur their economies. Job loss should be little to none and still more room for expansion.

If governments stop over spending, there's a surplus to apply to debt annually on all sides. If they don't, either an economical reset will be needed at some point or ALL may go bankrupt.

Stop buying votes with empty, planned, expenditures. Stop supporting freeloaders. AND stop creating worthless programs we don't need.

Do raise the educational curriculum as it VERY much needed. Stop wasting dollars on technology to promote laziness and ignorance.

RE: "THE IMPENETRABLE FASCIST'S MIND"

We pay no attention to lou. she knows nothing about Christianity and couldn't give a sermon on anything such as family, debt, leadership, friends, obedience, laws, or anything that actually brings what Christianity is together. More proof of the title. They speak with little to zero knowledge or understanding.

Since they claim to be so educated; let's see how many read this. More proof of their brainwashing as the reports tell the truth of a corrupt, anti-Trump attempt at a coup. He's still the president and he's still doing great things that none of weak-minded can accept.

There's Russian collusion and false narrative of such, but nothing to fall on Trump.

RE: "THE IMPENETRABLE FASCIST'S MIND"

Shame. I think I either missed a different start from another blog or the other half of that "conversation?" made absolutely zero sense at all.

Finally have a leader actually making headway to keep promises and pushing back global threats but the people claiming to be "sane", "educated", and "tolerant", are in complete denial and delusion.doh


Going back to bed. Too early to take in this much stupidity all at once.sleep

RE: "PEACE THROUGH POWER"

You do create some very nice blogs nam.

People don't seem to want the simplest of truths or the backings of history.

At least not in many places of this site.

Good job just the same.

RE: Very fake news

We'll see how it goes.

Already knew from the onset that there was nothing to find.

I'm still waiting to see some full improvement towards better standards, education, maybe even some more government cutbacks, and a lot less spending take place.

RE: "WHEN IT COMES TO GUNS"

Oldguy, the NRA spends more time and resources fighting politicians and politics since there are many that would sooner continue to usurp authority to continually take more rights away.

The government is not the answer but more of the reason for some of our biggest problems.

They have nothing to do with sales. They're not a dealership. No; I'm not a member but the more people scream about more gun laws when they are clueless about many that are in place, used, and work; the more I'm starting to consider it.

More resources to keep fighting worthless politics and too many clueless people on just how much laws, back ground checks, and more are already in place, is starting to appeal to me enough to actually consider becoming a member.

RE: "WHEN IT COMES TO GUNS"

Some people have no idea of what an assault rifle is by the looks of it. In U.S. armed service, I carried an M-60( up to about 650 round per minute) or sometimes, an M-16. My side arm was a model 1911 .45 caliber hand gun. Only fire arms with fully automatic capabilities are assault rifles such as the M-60 machine gun and the smaller M-16 rifle( which has a selector for the rate of fire desired)Single rate 12-15 rounds sustained, 45-60 rounds per minute burst, up to 700+ rounds per minute on auto. Then there is the M-249 S.A.W., squad automatic weapon,(rate of fire from about 750-1000+ plus rounds per minute determined by a selector valve). Just a few of the basic weapons our military might or still uses. They come in different designs, mounting methods, and actuating methods, based on application for the battle field. Some rates are basic but will do more or less depending on the operator.

It takes a dealers license for automatic weapons. The vast majority of people can not buy or own an assault rifle in the U.S.

Further more; no one can say what a person will be like down the road. Perfectly docile and law abiding then one day something goes wrong. We can't account for that. We can't account for a person that might suddenly become "radical" what ever. Just as we refuse to account that most mass shootings happen in places where the law abiding gun owners can't have their fire arms. We can't account for every well though out plan to take as many lives as possible for what may seem to be no apparent reason.

Even by best estimates, if the U.S. government tried, they may only manage to take away about 1/3 of the fire arms in the country. That would still leave roughly 200 million fire arms at the people's finger tips. Most people know the second amendment was put there for us, the people. It was put there to help protect us against the government and any other troubles that might potentially arise.

Every time some idiot politician talks about gun laws, when we actually do have more than enough of them, it reminds me who actually has the most to gain from taking as many fire arms away as they possibly can.

There's a reason why the U.S. has little worry from invasion among other things. The greatest atrocities have always been committed by a government. In all of those instances, the people had to first be subdued and disarmed. With some said governments even now, killing people for political differences as treason or some sort of insurrection, many seem more concerned about U.S. gun laws.

Leave the laws alone. There are many laws and the right to bare arms has more than a few purposes with reasons. When you take into account population size, any number of different views and values(which can lack severely in better directions), how many may not even know or understand anything about fire arms and laws but want one, how much greater is the possibility of radicalism, emotional melt down, or just plain being on the wrong side of the law?

RE: SHAME

Maybe you should look more at what Ricardo Rosello has been saying along with what's actually been happening. Then look into the back ground of that thing saying it's a mayor and what she has supported.

No love loss for something that twisted. She ranks right up there with people being able to keep their doctors and insurance if they like them. I have no respect for that gutter rat either.

RE: the one thing

When with a person; are we with them to mold them into what WE want?

There will be things about any significant other we may not like. If it's that big of a hang up, walk away and leave them alone.

Working together and making adjustments is a large part of what it's about with a partner. If I feel like I have to compete with something out of normal "boundaries"( i.e, children,etc) in their lives, why would I bother? Why should they or I, have to give up any thing? There are already many people that have made up their minds in certain traits and habits they won't deal with as it is. Does this close potential doors? Very much yes!

It's not a person's job to change or change some one else to fit "ideals". If both can't come together naturally knowing and accepting the other; it defeats the purpose of having some one for "you" and accepting them for being "them".

There's a point where it's may no longer be "them" your with, but maybe some one you've molded more into "you". Once things like this start. they tend to not stop until some one makes it stop.

This is a list of blog comments created by Draegoneer.

We use cookies to ensure that you have the best experience possible on our website. Read Our Privacy Policy Here