Right is right and likewise wrong is wrong. You need to contemplate when you were wrong and not when you are right. Self righteousness is an inherent evil but it needs a courage to locate the selfwrongness. I pity myself that it took eight long years. I agree she presented it in a vulgar way, exaggerated it, that was her fault but I can't hide mine behind it. Who initiated it? It was none other than me. Well I think, life is like that. What about you? I wish you good.
. Yes that girl. She was rightly angry. I was wrong as I was so rude to her. And you were also accessory before or after the fact because you were supporting me.
@ JJung ~~~~~~ just green meadow in Asia is enough! I loved both this poetry and the poetess You have a bonus. Really worth a dividend What is that, you need to ask me.
Countless hours wasted or encashed, that's purely subjective. but yes had I have had a say in the site's administration, I would have turned it into a discourse sort of thing than this hotch - potch.
Sir, you are entitled to your views or whatever you hold... We can agree, we can disagree. But yes if you wish to debate...then its your perception...mine is an argument. Thank you.
@something like snook ~~~ I don't believe in deleting the comments of idiots. I think that'll suffice. But yes I can hardly believe that a resident of Great Britain can be foolish, or you migrated from Banana republic and couldn't adapt to the culture.
Intelligences is a subjective barometer and hardly makes the person a genuine human being.... ~~~~ Your observation embodies two statements ~~~~ One, that intelligence is subjectively evaluated. Agreed! But you shrewdly avoided my assessment. Anyways... ~~~~ The other part (which is hesitantly assertive), questions the genuineness? ~~~~ Sorry gentleman its not a healthy approach or a discourse.
@seaworthy never stopped her before..... ~~~~ Well you are sharp to notice it. But could you cite any instance where she performed that low? Won't you appreciate that she is above average intelligent person? Please correct me if I am wrong.
The natural intent of the blogger, when he/she asks a question is, he/she needs an approval. That's true in my case. You approve it or counter, that's absolutely your prerogative, I am nobody there. But yes I must respond to the reasonable, responsible and logical reasonings. I beg some time, being idler, old school and more than that adapted to the most modern ways of life.
@jac_the_gripper Why would the republican party take the risk of backing Trump given the current circumstances? ~~~~ How naive...you need not pen on the subject, you know nothing about. ~~~~ Where is the grand old party? If it really exist? I seriously doubt. They can choose an astray dog for the highest post, let Trump alone, who is still a potent candidate, whether me, you or others like it or not, because we don't have any say in this regard. ~~~~ Mind my words, His nomination will be challenged by his own circles but noway by the GOP.
Yeaà true, health concern is one thing... But to be conscious, rather to be extra conscious...that is again a health issue. ~~~~ Much more to say... Later...as its the last chapter I would like to read
Nothing like that, that's why I asked plainly. That was another lady, probably from Australia, with the username resembling "enigma or something like that." We were open to each other. My apologies I took you to be her, though I had my doubts. I thought better I ask you.
Where is Patti Benzschewal.
Yes, I was active then.The only difference is that I keep a low profile now a days.