RE: 7 X 13 = 28

Therefore:

1634=11230000

RE: Late night confession

It's ok, though, 'cos they're not real bears...

RE: Late night confession

confused

RE: Late night confession



(Video contains bears)

RE: Late night confession

But of course, I must thank my forebears...


teddybear teddybear teddybear teddybear

RE: Late night confession

And if life has no meaning (it may); then it is up to us to impose some meaning on it. Some do that through religion, and some do that through science, and furthermore, some simply don't care.


wave

RE: Late night confession

Have a bear


teddybear

RE: For The Booze Hound In Your Life

Not a bad idea..

RE: Late night confession

It may all be just a meaningless fractal pattern.

RE: For The Booze Hound In Your Life

I'd advise you not to touch the goon, mate...it's lethal!


scold

RE: For The Booze Hound In Your Life



(Leave me out of that one!)

What's Your Favorite Music Video?

Music for our times, undoubtedly...


What's Your Favorite Music Video?

@ Fargo, ok, thanks, I'll have to check that out...

What's Your Favorite Music Video?

Disclosure...


What's Your Favorite Music Video?

Thanks for the addition, mate...


thumbs up

RE: 7 X 13 = 28

If 3312=96100

And 3421=9820

Then 1634 = ?

RE: A. I. Benefit or problem ?

What was your comment exactly?

What's Your Favorite Music Video?

You am I..... Purple Sneakers

What's Your Favorite Music Video?

You am I.....Berlin Chair (2010)


RE: God Himself Could Not Sink This Ship

@ mermaid

I salute the amount of effort, that you put into this blog!



wave
View Blog
1
    Last Liked: Oct 11

RE: Future foods for climate change.

Actually, I suspect that you would have extreme difficulty envisioning a number over 1000 (say)....

RE: Future foods for climate change.

10 of cupss

THIS is "too insignificant" is it???




You have absolutely no idea, about the magnitude of large numbers...

RE: Future foods for climate change.

8 Billion + people are "too insignificant" are they?



confused

RE: Future foods for climate change.

Obviously there is a CO2 problem, otherwise glaciers would not be melting at record rates (amongst many other indicators)....denial may be (for some) a fun game to play, but it does not accord with the reality of the scientific data.

Rather like someone claiming that the Earth can support 15 billion (or more) people. Also wishful thinking (based on a fallacy)....

RE: Future foods for climate change.

Actually, the sources (I linked) are from NASA. Obviously you know, more than the scientists, there, it would appear...


confused

RE: Future foods for climate change.

Continued.....

It is increasing exponentially, because, the global human population, is also increasing exponentially, in a concurrent fashion. It is not rocket science!





professor

RE: Future foods for climate change.

@ tenofcups (some time back)

I have supplied the scientifically valided graphs, and links; which explicitly refute your comments; however you do not appear to have troubled yourself to have read those. One final time: man-made CO2 is increasing exponentially.....

RE: Future foods for climate change.



So there is more "plant food" (CO2), than the vegetative mass of land and sea, can handle - hence the CO2 concentration in the Earth's atmosphere increases; and as the link shows, it is NOT a natural increase....

RE: Future foods for climate change.

Greatly exceeded, already, actually....






professor

RE: Future foods for climate change.

That's like saying a tomato is ok, because it only has a bit of DDT sprayed on it. It is the particular molecule (in this case CO2), and the maximum safe concentration, to avoid warming;- (which we have already exceeded, btw).

This is a list of blog comments created by lovecanbereal.

We use cookies to ensure that you have the best experience possible on our website. Read Our Privacy Policy Here