Being a conservative judge when the judiciary, at least these last 60 years or so, has been a silent partner of the left. To judge by their profession any court should be weighted 70% towards liberals, and it would take a lot of scheming for it to be otherwise.
And even when moneypower and never leaving the house unite this cannot ward off adapting to your environment completely. It's too expensive to simply never adapt/reform yourself, eventually you have to adapt to a life that contains other life.
Moneypower and/or never leaving the house are two ways of having the environment adapt to you rather than the other way around. But there are strings attached to leaving your front door, for one thing put some trousers on. Life is like that. The more that you experience, the more that you venture, the less life actually does happen on your terms.
So I guess I do know how America recovers and it's by a new generation. The old are set in their ways and that way is to annihilate the other half of society, growing older and so bitter makes the coming civil war almost impossible to avoid. No new paradigm can arise, the soul cannot be healed, because it's too old.
He's only four years older than Trump, but it is just a number. The difference in presence of mind is enormous, Trump can use his own wits more readily than Biden can read a script.
It doesn't matter the organisation, the most intelligent people are in second and third place. The top is made out of cronies. Not all who are at the top, but they are lower on average
Anyway I tend to believe that AI won't try to kill us. It could be a benefit, and even more of a benefit if it replaces human government entirely, but that benefit might very well be a problem. I guess I believe that Brave New World is more likely to happen over 1984. I kind of think this was happening anyway, the growing rapport with our pets stems from the fact we are one. So much the benefit to civilisation the AI might be I think you'll find humanity lunging for the wilderness, even more than today
Long story short a huge war would reduce the chance of us putting the AI in charge one day. And that is the real danger/prospect. As the last thing that can think logically and the only thing that can put things into context. The one thing with the breadth of perception, the processing power, to know what something means when it happens in an environment that is anything but simple or familiar to any human being.
50 years if nothing changes about society. 30 years if there was a huge war followed by a baby boom. A huge war that accelerates our learning, establishes the importance of real learning no more diploma mills and religious woke education that nearly got us killed in the war, and then the species gets a lot younger. A relevantly experienced and well-educated population that is a lot younger. Then it would be 30 years until we understand where we are now.
In humanity's defence it's not like we can become gainfully self-employed just by doing what comes naturally. We can't go wherever we like and poach whatever we can because of government and private property and things. Property is theft of our natural employment, and if you were to ask the ancient Greeks being civilised is unemployment itself.
Interestingly enough that greening is less a product of greenhouse gases or planting trees, but a by-product of the intensive farming that would have happened anyway. This counter to climate change is primarily a happy coincidence, not a plan nothing we consciously meant to happen. I suppose it's more like the immune system the way that life tries to find a balance with its environment, no schemes.
If the good earth was rich and could provide for everyone I think there would still be a problem with our attitude to life and each other.
This environment really does seem to emphasize how much you could love humanity in the abstract yet make a terrible neighbour and an even worse friend. All the fellow-feeling goes into the cats and dogs having failed to find love amongst our own species. The issue I have with climate change is that it's already there to have it in for our own species and mistake nature for a pet. Anti-human anyway, mistaken about nature anyway.
And all that could be why women are diagnosed autistic less often than men are. The truth is that they "get" others better than men do on average and even if she doesn't the autistic girl is more likely to defer. Is less likely to insist her way over yours even if she doesn't comprehend your way whatsoever.
The autistic girl is not so much a sperglord. The sperglord is more likely to be male, more likely to say it's my autistic way or the high way. Men act on their autism more than women do, aspie bull is the manner of the sperglord and it doesn't leave much room for each to their own.
Maybe fish on a Friday is more accurately depicted as an OCD. However, when you codify the ocd of one man and make it for all then that is autistic. When the prophet does not believe that the ocd is his quirk, his own peculiarity, but it is the way everybody should live. OCD crosses the line into autism when you make the rules from the OCD of one man as though other people were a complete mystery, doesn't even register that they don't need to live like that.
Apologies, jac. It just really irks me when people don't appreciate the roll of a dice that life actually is, the swathes of life beyond your control a large part of the reason why good things happen to bad people and bad things happen to good people. I dislike the idea that whatever happens actually is justice and the justice system is nothing but a formality to rubber stamp things as they are in the interests of a few.
Karma is a blessing when you're claiming the achievements of your parents as your own. To be born into great fortune is not fortunate it is deserved.
It's quite another when it means that your whole village gets wiped out because one tried to escape to South Korea. And anyone who even descends from that village will forever be a marked man. You are personally to blame for the collective even if you weren't even born.
Why not just stick with the old catholic guilt? The mighty rule because they deserve to and the weak suffer because they deserve to. Why do you have to rebrand the feudal darkness by recourse to oriental despotism?
And all the more so now that people are living longer. Now that the same people and the same forces stay in power for a lot longer we simply must do nothing to allow for something to behave with substance and integrity. Like you may have done when you were younger men righting the wrongs of the old order. Dictator for life means a lot more than it used to do now that people are living a lot longer and we simply must do something, try a lot harder to find something that can resist corruption
Bring on the honourable lord justice chat gpt. Or a toilet cleaner. Give the one ring to Frodo or anything that doesn't desire the power to take liberties. Worst of both worlds is to give the one ring to those who want it most.
The tyranny of the judiciary is actually the worst bit, the least accountable part of the government and they get away with it because of so called rule of law. Simp public
And I suspect that red meat will be the one we grow in a lab.
What we will not do is eat the bugs. There'll be a war before you'd get very many of us to eat the bugs, a war that kills so many that the bugs go right off the table. Those who fight and survive get to live in liberty with a happy future ahead. The days of rationing and collectively grinding down our sense of self-worth far behind.
500 to 1500 quid (£) a month. It depends where you want to live. Your money goes a lot further outside of London. You'll get a small flat in the north for the same price as a cupboard under the stairs in London.
You could take America and its guns as a welcome contrast to the live slow, die old suspicious of everyone you meet position of an old woman even when it's a young man. America as a contrast to the godforsaken longevity of a life half lived. A rugged country, a young country, a country for those who want to live not merely survive.
And im not saying those who can't hurt you actually do want to hurt you. What I'm saying is that the great untested will assume this. They will be more suspicious and defensive for NOT facing any danger in life. The problem with safespace is how you'll never see the good in people. You'll never see another person as the reason why you didn't come to harm. Everyone exists as a potential threat and a great unknown that is feared by the majority. That's the price of safespace, the downfall of liberty and of trust
Chatrooms are a bit too open, a bit too easy to connect losers and criminals. The blogs and forums are everything here that isn't a dating site I always thought. You wouldn't tell your date about this until the time was right, if they like you they'll accept our faults
ChesneyChrist Blog Comments (1,393)
RE: I'm concerned about Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas...
Being a conservative judge when the judiciary, at least these last 60 years or so, has been a silent partner of the left. To judge by their profession any court should be weighted 70% towards liberals, and it would take a lot of scheming for it to be otherwise.