1. Could they have mounted a camera on the landing ramp to capture the 'small step for a man'? Would that be a plausible explanation? Do they have to have faked it for that picture to be taken?
2. Who said that the moon don't have gravity? It do. Every mass does (including an oil tanker for example, yourself, myself etc). The moon's acceleration due to gravity is ~1.6 m/s^2 (which is about a sixth that of the earth) but that's enough to leave an imprint in the soft, dusty lunar surface.
Well, 'believing' in the lunar landing/s is not a matter of belief really. We have plenty of independently verified evidence to support that claim.
I spent 30 years of my existence dispelling such nonsense on here, and I even dared think that I convinced you. Alas, you can only lead a horse to water.
"and space is only some 62" Well, that is unlikely. You are probably referring to the depth of the atmosphere which is often quoted as roughly 60 miles. Could that be it? Space, being a dimension, is conceptually infinite.
-gravity is space. It's the curvature of space.
-A body travels through space (or any other dimension) relative to some other frame of reference, so it all depends on what your reference is. Lets assume for simplicity that both you and I are stationary. Since both you and I are on the surface of the earth, then we are not travelling through space with respect to each other (or the earth), yet both of us are travelling through space with respect to the sun.
Yes, there really is no escaping the fear of death. We are all at the mercy of our instinct of survival and that will 'make us' fear death (through the release of cortisol, adrenaline etc) so as to avoid it irrespective of how feasible that is. Think about it, if it wasn't that way, all the religious fanatics around us would already be dead one way or another.
Basically, we all yearn for the afterlife but nobody really wants to go there...
Because not everyone is into self-posting. You see blogs with 2k comments, all by the author to himself. I find that heart breaking. A bit like the old cat lady talking to her cats. She's talking to herself at the end of the day.
I comment on my blog in response to someone's post or if I want to add something. If there's nothing for me to say, I say nothing. If people don't comment anymore on my blog, then that means that there's no more interest in that blog, and I let it go.
It's all about the definition. If you can define 'true', 'real', and 'mad', and hence 'false', 'not real' and 'sane' respectively by deduction, then you would know what is what.
What I meant is, it would get so boring if we had to abide by all the blog rules that no one would be able to stave off the coma that would grip him/her in order to be able to keep on blogging.
Yes, shooting is fun. I have a sport shotgun which I used for sport and another for hunting (although I don't do that anymore. Killing animals (birds) is for barbarians). I never felt "powerful" or "cool" holding a gun though. That's very important. Very!
I think you bother too much with this rubbish (rules, there's written this and that, etc). If everyone had to stick by the rules, you'd have the blogs all for yourself, by youself imo.
teddyKaz Blog Comments (330)
RE: Space and the wonders of the universe
1. Could they have mounted a camera on the landing ramp to capture the 'small step for a man'? Would that be a plausible explanation? Do they have to have faked it for that picture to be taken?2. Who said that the moon don't have gravity? It do. Every mass does (including an oil tanker for example, yourself, myself etc). The moon's acceleration due to gravity is ~1.6 m/s^2 (which is about a sixth that of the earth) but that's enough to leave an imprint in the soft, dusty lunar surface.
Well, 'believing' in the lunar landing/s is not a matter of belief really. We have plenty of independently verified evidence to support that claim.